re: Anyone here think improving our relations with Russia is a bad idea?

Wrong dumbass. There was zero context. Every bit of that involved trump whining and bitching like the pussy he is. Congress got those things done in spite of the incompetent pussy.

You are dumb as shite linking that arricle and ignoring everything else to try and fool people.

quote:

---

I believe she also writes for Fox News

---

Yeah, I just googled her name and her bio everywhere including LinkedIn says Republican strategist.

No one is stupid enough to believe the headline of that article.

Except crisp and he has already shown how stupid he is.

I dont have to look anything up.

I pay fricking attention and remember each of those events.

I dont really dislike you crisp, but I'm sick of bullshite like you posted. Everyone that pays attention knows trump did not want to implement the Russian sanctions and the only reason he did not veto them was because the veto would have been overridden immediately.

You are the one who needs to learn something about what is going on. Or maybe you know and are just being a disingenuous bitch. IDk.

quote:

---

I dont have to look anything up.

---

You stupid bastard, I was addressing Rockee..a excellent example of your dangerously zealous and narrow minded view of Trump.

..you are definitely one of those minions of "hired hand" bean counters that one runs into in a typical business office...bless your inconsequential little heart!

quote:

---

you are definitely one of those minions of "hired hand" bean counters that one runs into in a typical business office...bless your inconsequential little heart!

---

See, this is how I know I'm dealing with a loser at life. Ignorant personal attacks.

I dont know why I engage with people like u though I do try to avoid it.

And I really dont even understand your comment. It makes no sense as far as what I do for a living which is frankly of no concern to you. I dont care what you do. But I probably pay more in just federal taxes than you and your family (if you have one) make in a year.

quote:

---

See, this is how I know I'm dealing with a loser at life. Ignorant personal attacks.

I dont know why I engage with people like u though I do try to avoid it.

And I really dont even understand your comment. It makes no sense as far as what I do for a living which is frankly of no concern to you. I dont care what you do. But I probably pay more in just federal taxes than you and your family (if you have one) make in a year.

---

Your past comments and general demeanor on the board led me to my conclusion..hell, I had folks like you on my payroll for years, and have one now to keep me out of an IRS office.
As for our incomes, I sold my business to a publicly traded entity and retired in 2001, and was blessed to be very comfortable financially...I don't have a clue what your employer pays you...and don't care.......I thought you were through conversing with me?..what changed?

quote:

---

The article was about facts. Regardless of who writes/says it....a fact is a fact.. If you're skeptical...look the events up yourself!

---

Too bad those facts were negated when Trump met Putin in person and he turned into a quivering cuckold

This is fricking hilarious.

Yesterday I guaranteed the lying pussy beta cuck conman would totally flip flop and do a 180 precisely because he is a mealy mouth conman but to see it in words with time stamps is comical. Dude is the biggest pussy ever.

quote:

---

President Donald Trump and his White House staff, facing an onslaught of bipartisan fury over his glowing remarks about Vladimir Putin, have been forced to walk-back, clarify, and outright deny remarks Trump made that have cast doubt on his belief in US intelligence agencies' findings that the Russians did in fact meddle in the US election.
Confused? You're not alone. Here's a short timeline of what's been said:
Monday, 11:50 a.m. ET: During Monday's news conference, Trump sided with Putin over US intelligence, saying, "My people came to me -- Dan Coats came to me and some others -- they said they think it’s Russia. I have President Putin; he just said it’s not Russia. I will say this: I don’t see any reason why it would be." Moments later, he added, "I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today."
Monday, 3:40 p.m. ET: Trump tweeted, "As I said today and many times before, 'I have GREAT confidence in MY intelligence people.' However, I also recognize that in order to build a brighter future, we cannot exclusively focus on the past – as the world’s two largest nuclear powers, we must get along!"
Tuesday, 2:30 p.m. ET: Facing a growing backlash upon returning to Washington, D.C., Trump said that he "realized there is some need for clarification" about his remarks on Russian interference in the 2016 US election. "In a key sentence in my remarks I said the word 'would' instead of 'wouldn't.'" He explained he had reviewed a transcript and video of his remarks. "The sentence should have been: 'I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be Russia'," he said. Sort of a double negative."
Wednesday, 12:30 p.m. ET: Speaking during a Cabinet meeting at the White House, Trump was asked by a reporter if Russia was still targeting the US. "No," he responded, looking directly at the reporter. 
Wednesday, 2:45 p.m. ET: Asked about the comment later, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said the President was declining to answer shouted questionswhen he said "no," and not disputing intelligence findings. "The President said 'thank you very much' and said no to answering questions," Sanders said.
Wednesday, 5 p.m. ET: President Trump said he holds his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin personally responsible for Moscow's attempts to interfere in the 2016 US election. In an interview with CBS News anchor Jeff Glor, Trump said Putin was culpable as Russia's leader. "I would because he’s in charge of the country just like I consider myself to be responsible for things that happen in this country," Trump said. "So certainly as the leader of the country you would have to hold him responsible."

---