Started By
Message
Stole this from Tigerboard, frick it
Posted on 1/7/15 at 9:37 am
Posted on 1/7/15 at 9:37 am
Mizzou is the 38th youngest team in the country. Between having two favorite teams SLU(16th) and mizzou(38th) being so young and so frustrating makes this season hell.
BUTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT more times than not, it pays off in the future.
LINK
BUTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT more times than not, it pays off in the future.
LINK
2
Posted on 1/7/15 at 9:53 am to mizslu314
Not to derail the thread but I'd like to see Mizzou play SLU and SMSU every year alternating home and home. I think it would be an RPI booster.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 10:16 am to notsince98
I'd like to see that too. Frick the egos. If we can go to Arkansas State and Toledo to play football, we can go to SLU to play hoops.
As for the youth, I'm curious what the numbers would be like if broken down by minutes played too. Or is that how they calculated that. Because, really, Shamburger is the only upper classman with significant PT.
Bello hardly play.
Rosburg hardly plays.
Post hardly plays.
As for the youth, I'm curious what the numbers would be like if broken down by minutes played too. Or is that how they calculated that. Because, really, Shamburger is the only upper classman with significant PT.
Bello hardly play.
Rosburg hardly plays.
Post hardly plays.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 10:25 am to reedus23
For me I love that they don't play each other, I want them to never cross paths. It really allows me to have a true 50/50 with them.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 11:53 am to mizslu314
quote:
Between having two favorite teams SLU and mizzou
Posted on 1/7/15 at 12:07 pm to notsince98
quote:
Not to derail the thread but I'd like to see Mizzou play SLU and SMSU every year alternating home and home. I think it would be an RPI booster.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 4:19 pm to notsince98
quote:
Not to derail the thread but I'd like to see Mizzou play SLU and SMSU every year alternating home and home. I think it would be an RPI booster.
There is nothing to gain from beating those schools and everything to lose. The opposite is true for them. I say no thanks.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 4:21 pm to KCM0Tiger
quote:
There is nothing to gain from beating those schools and everything to lose. The opposite is true for them. I say no thanks.
Is that still the case?
Posted on 1/7/15 at 5:18 pm to reedus23
Any coach at Mizzou who has to hang their hat on beating SMS should be fired. Almost immediately.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 5:21 pm to the808bass
Can we please worry about beating UMKC before we start talking about beating SMS. 
I kid. I kid. For those that take it serious.
I kid. I kid. For those that take it serious.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 5:51 pm to reedus23
quote:
Is that still the case?
This year? No. But 8 or 9 out of 10 years Mizzou will be a better team than either of those
Posted on 1/7/15 at 5:59 pm to KCM0Tiger
SLU ain't fairing much better than us this year.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:32 pm to reedus23
quote:
SLU ain't fairing much better than us this year.
Interesting. They'd had a pretty good run of years it seemed like. I obviously don't follow them at all but I figured it'd be the same this year.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:44 pm to KCM0Tiger
Naw. The influence of Majerus is now gone from SLU. They are playing young too but I don't see Crews getting them to the level Majerus got them.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:14 am to reedus23
SLU and Mizzou are looking at the same game plan. Both are strugggggggling this year, but both could be looking at the dance the next 3 years (excluding anyone going pro i.e. Yarbrough*maybe Tatum*, MGC, jW3, or Gant.) Missouri basketball has a promising future y'all!
Posted on 1/10/15 at 10:13 pm to mizslu314
I'm not confident we keep all these kids since they are not all Kim's recruits. Some may leave which is not always a bad thing. I would be surprised if Gant is here four years.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News