Started By
Message

re: Mauk update

Posted on 12/20/15 at 4:06 pm to
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
20984 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Sounds like alot of you wish ill upon Mauk, for whatever reason.

If you want to wish him the best, perhaps don't use rumors and hearsay as a basis for your opinion on him.

If you just want Lock to be QB, just say so. But Mauk is a Missouri Tiger, and it is pretty shitty of fans to not support him and throw him under the bus.

Remember how "Mauk was so terrible", until Lock came and the offense became terrible. Mauk has really gotten the short end of the stick multiple times. He was a great backup as a RS FR, waiting for his time, not making a fuss, and being a good teammate.

Lets be supportive fans.


Yes. I really wish Pinkel, his staff and his 84 teammates didn't let The Mauk down like they did. Twice.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120554 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

There are things that I do truly know...but the rumors of slinging booger sugar are not one of them. Weed is a definite. The rest is just hearsay, which can get distorted really quickly.


What can't get distorted is the length of the initial suspension and the length of the subsequent suspension. If you can find a another commensurate level suspension where it was known to be "just weed," feel free to share.
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25492 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

But for the original event, there is still plenty to question. Lets say it was only weed, something multiple players on the team have been caught with (and not berated on these message boards).



I'll just put it this way and it's enough for me. It doesn't need to be enough for you but it is for me. Anyone else with just weed would miss 1 or 2 games and be back. I've heard enough from enough reliable sources, that when all put together I have little doubt.

quote:

But as for the offense. There is no denying that when it sucked the first 4 games, there was more blame placed upon Mauk than Lock got the entire rest of the season.



As there should be. Mauk is a 4th year player. Lock is a 1st year player. Everyone knew there was a great chance that we'd lose every single game under Lock. I was willing to take those losses to prepare for next year.

quote:

I think Lock will be the greatest QB Mizzou has ever had, but I think he needed a year to adjust to the college game,


Ideally he would have redshirted last year. But last year was far from ideal.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 6:24 pm to
I never understood throwing Mauk the player under the bus either. Yeah he took off running almost every play, but he had three big fast guys coming after him untouched almost every play. Lock stands in there and get's hammered. Not sure that's better. I do get liking Lock's arm.

quote:

What can't get distorted is the length of the initial suspension and the length of the subsequent suspension.
We know what caused the second suspension because it happened in public. We don't know anything else about the first one. There would be a difference between selling weed and using. But as usual we actually know very little. We good at that
Posted by JAGsports
Union Star
Member since Dec 2015
948 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 6:31 pm to
The naive fans think Mauk is a great QB and MAYBE has smoked weed. The fans who pay attention know that he is an average QB on his best days and has a Coke problem
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 6:36 pm to
Post a credible link and I will agree that you're knowledgeable.
Posted by JAGsports
Union Star
Member since Dec 2015
948 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 7:20 pm to
If I had one that would mean he is either in Jail or rehab. Which with all the crap MU has taken this season will make it worse. This is like Mike Sam. Everyone knew but no one said a word
Posted by pauliebleaker
Chesterfield
Member since Jul 2014
1846 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 9:46 am to
Collin Steenbergen ?@ruby92879 Dec 18
I have it confirmed from a extremely credible source in Springfield that Maty Mauk is officially no long enrolled at University of Missouri!

I don't know if the source is reliable but passing it on.
Posted by 5thTiger
Member since Nov 2014
7996 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 9:53 am to
quote:

I have it confirmed from a extremely credible source in Springfield that Maty Mauk is officially no long enrolled at University of Missouri!

I don't know if the source is reliable but passing it on.


Well...the semester is officially over...

He and Dearmond were have a little Twitter spat. Really entertaining.
Posted by wubilli
Columbia
Member since Apr 2014
5517 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 10:09 am to
quote:

source is reliable but passing it on.



Morrison spoke with Mauks dad over the weekend. He tweeted out that the father says that Mauk has been reinstated and is planning to be back in the spring.
Posted by JAGsports
Union Star
Member since Dec 2015
948 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 11:39 am to
The news isn't nearly as fun as the Twitter fight. Never listened to the Mizzodcast. Is it good?
Posted by jafo
Northwest Missouri State Bearcats
Member since Jan 2012
2954 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 11:57 am to
quote:

If I had one that would mean he is either in Jail or rehab. Which with all the crap MU has taken this season will make it worse. This is like Mike Sam. Everyone knew but no one said a word


This right here sums it up. Had it actually been as serious as everyone thinks it is, wouldn't the authorities been notified at some point? I mean some of these kids get busted smoking weed around campus, if Mauk had something harder, say cocaine, I figured he be sitting in jail with his scolarship pulled. End of story. My impressions were an alcohol problem. Then the rumor mill started and it dealing cocaine. What's next?

Thing is, everyone can give their best guess off of second or third hand info. None of us were sitting in that room when he was suspended. That info still hasn't come out except in the form of rumors.

Shouldn't judge the kid on hearsay. The situation will run it's course. Let it. If he's good enough, he'll get to start. If not, well he'll be a backup. It's that simple. If he starts to be a cancer for the team, then Odom will probably address it. Other than that, it is what it is. He's still here. He still has his scholarship and is more or less on the team.
Posted by Literalist
Minnesota
Member since Oct 2014
3582 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 12:36 pm to
I heard they discovered his cache of Kansas Jayhawk T-shirts.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 12:53 pm to
Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone else's opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Shouldn't judge the kid on hearsay.
Clearly you don't know what the rant is about
Posted by SemperFi
St Louis
Member since Nov 2015
1530 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 2:12 pm to
When Mauk pissed away his second chance within hours....... That was enough for me..... Obviously he really could give two shits about his team.
Anyone trying to spin this as "poor Matty" or "hearsay" is a koolaid drinking homer.

Hearsay doesn't get you suspended.



Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120554 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:21 pm to
Prediction: Maty Mauk doesn't play another down of football for Mizzou and isn't on the team by halfway through the 2016 football season.
Posted by jafo
Northwest Missouri State Bearcats
Member since Jan 2012
2954 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:32 pm to
Bold prediction. Anything is possible.
Posted by jafo
Northwest Missouri State Bearcats
Member since Jan 2012
2954 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

Clearly you don't know what the rant is about


LOL. Guess not. I'm confident of one thing. I'm pretty sure not one poster here was sitting in the room when Mauk was suspended either time. Not saying rumors are not true but not saying they are either. I am 100% sure I wasn't there and don't plan on throwing a kid under the bus with second or third hand info. Just puting that out there. Until Mauk or someone involved in the suspension steps out and says this is what he was suspended for, then I'll hold back judgemental jargon.

I know Blaine Dalton was dismissed for prescrip drugs. He had one chance and got popped on the second occurrence. That was prescrip drugs. I would imagine if it were illegal drugs of some kind, Mauk wouldn't be here right now. This is not the case at this point. The staff according to PM, has given Mauk a path back to being on the team. Of course this is also third hand info, but usually PM won't put info out there they don't feel is accurate.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120554 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

Of course this is also third hand info, but usually PM won't put info out there they don't feel is accurate


I laughed.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter