Started By
Message
Anderson vs Cuonzo Anderson has retired
Posted on 3/3/22 at 10:01 am
Posted on 3/3/22 at 10:01 am
I think Kim Anderson is the better coach. He had to deal with Haith sanctions and 5 of Haith’s players transferring.
Cuonzo is just a bad coach. He is a terrible game manager. He has had a lot better talent and did nothing with it.
Kim Anderson in 3 years had overall record 26-68.
He finished last in conference play every year(2016-2017 tied for last).
Cuonzo in 5 years has a overall record of 76-76.
He finished 4th, 12th, tied for 10th, 7th, and 12th in conference play. He went to the NCAA twice
I think they are about even in recruiting.
Conference recruiting ranking
Anderson 2nd,10th, and 12th
Cuonzo 2nd, 10th, 12th, and 14th.
Cuonzo is just a bad coach. He is a terrible game manager. He has had a lot better talent and did nothing with it.
Kim Anderson in 3 years had overall record 26-68.
He finished last in conference play every year(2016-2017 tied for last).
Cuonzo in 5 years has a overall record of 76-76.
He finished 4th, 12th, tied for 10th, 7th, and 12th in conference play. He went to the NCAA twice
I think they are about even in recruiting.
Conference recruiting ranking
Anderson 2nd,10th, and 12th
Cuonzo 2nd, 10th, 12th, and 14th.
4
Posted on 3/3/22 at 10:16 am to MizzouBS
quote:
I think Kim Anderson is the better coach.
Beyond that, you're not wrong.
Posted on 3/3/22 at 10:23 am to MizzouBS
Hey guys! Which of the two worst coaches in Missouri’s modern history do you think is worse?
Posted on 3/3/22 at 11:53 am to the808bass
I put my vote in as...Cuonzo is a wee bit worse.
ETA: Reason? I think Cuonzo had better players to work with.
ETA: Reason? I think Cuonzo had better players to work with.
This post was edited on 3/3/22 at 11:56 am
Posted on 3/3/22 at 1:25 pm to MizzouBS
I would agree about Kim. He was not a good recruiter but he was a fine coach (although he did land a lot of 4* players). Hell, he beat Pearl multiple times with much less talent and Pearl is a solid coach. Plus you dont win a national championship at any level without knowing how to coach at a high level.
This post was edited on 3/3/22 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 3/3/22 at 2:08 pm to MizzouBS
Give me Cuonzo 10/10 times over Kim.
Posted on 3/3/22 at 2:36 pm to mizslu314
I would say 15 times out of 10.
Posted on 3/3/22 at 2:37 pm to the808bass
I don’t like either of their schtick, but at least Cuonzo’s schtick is quieter.
Posted on 3/3/22 at 2:49 pm to the808bass
One could not win at this level. One cannot consistently win at this level.
Neither was or is enjoyable to watch.
Neither was or is enjoyable to watch.
Posted on 3/3/22 at 3:28 pm to Drydock
Poor Kimbo finished this year at 8-20. Cuonzo is sitting at 10-20. Pretty even, so...I think the important question is...who was the better Big Brother to his players?
Posted on 3/3/22 at 4:56 pm to Literalist
Like asking me if I’d rather be eaten alive by a lion or a tiger.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News