Started By
Message
When will the mods finally clean up the countless aisles of LF7vsNC27?
Posted on 9/24/15 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 9/24/15 at 1:59 pm
It's like we all see Aunt Susan at the Thanksgiving Table...we see her glassy eyes. We see her herky-jerky movements with the mashed potatoes. Even the kids noticed she got up 3 times before the first person went for the Pecan Pie.
We all know she's on crank and she can't help herself...but nobody's gonna step in and say something?
C'mon mods...Help save tSECr from itself!
We all know she's on crank and she can't help herself...but nobody's gonna step in and say something?
C'mon mods...Help save tSECr from itself!
Posted on 9/24/15 at 1:59 pm to GFunk
right after they clear out the multitude of posters who registered in september 2015 who do nothing but flame and start shite threads all the time.
Which will probably be...who knows.
Which will probably be...who knows.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 2:00 pm to GFunk
quote:
When will the mods finally clean up the countless aisles of LF7vsNC27?
When NC27 starts dwarfing LF7 again.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 2:02 pm to GFunk
Sooooooo.... who do you think will be taken first in the draft? LF7 or NC27?
Posted on 9/24/15 at 2:03 pm to GFunk
quote:
When will the mods finally clean up the countless aisles of LF7vsNC27?
when the gates get locked on tiger rant
Posted on 9/24/15 at 2:06 pm to GFunk
I don't see the big deal really. They both are backs I would want on my team. Both play heavy competition. I don't think stats at the end of the year are going to tell the story on these two bulls.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 2:13 pm to GFunk
It's not nearly as bad as the LSU-A&M flame war that has been going on for 9 months now.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 2:23 pm to CajunTiger_225
quote:
I don't see the big deal really
There is not one single, solitary piece of information or data out there that would be new to the conversation. Anything that is brought up has already been brought up 100 times in the offseason, with both sides saying the same thing they've always said with nobody changing their mind on whose better. It's just pointless and goes nowhere.
Now, as to the point of the thread...I'm not sure a mod could/should ever make a topic like that "off limits", that seems to be against the spirit of what a mod should do. If anything, board users should mercilessly and cruelly mock the next OP that starts one and hopefully it will curtain people from doing it in the future.
But back to my first post in this thread...somethign needs to be done about all these alters. Make a rule that you can't start a thread until you've been here 30 days or something. The amount of posters who have registered for less than a week with 50+ posts and they're all nothing but flames is really starting to get annoying as shite.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 2:31 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Make a rule that you can't start a thread until you've been here 30 days or something. The amount of posters who have registered for less than a week with 50+ posts and they're all nothing but flames is really starting to get annoying as shite.
Strongly support. I know it's usually us but when you have posters by the thousands a click away it's kind of tough.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 3:40 pm to WG_Dawg
A lot of them have been registered for a while and just started (or resumed) actively posting after Ole Miss beat Bama.
It's like they've been lying in wait for the opportunity and once it presented itself they seized upon it like a pack of coyotes upon a wounded deer.
It's like they've been lying in wait for the opportunity and once it presented itself they seized upon it like a pack of coyotes upon a wounded deer.
Back to top
