Started By
Message

re: Is TJGator a long troll Nole fan?

Posted on 1/31/18 at 5:17 pm to
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 1/31/18 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

3. No one is saying Kirby is WM, but there are a lot of similarities from recruiting, to defenses that are ''top ten'' but seem to give up 500 yard games all over the place. It's to be decided at a future date, not anything conclusive right now.


You've basically said it for the better part of a year now... you maybe backing off of it, but wtf man. At least be *somewhat* intellectually honest here.

Kirby as a coach is going to be judged on more than year one or year two, but to act like you haven't basically said that he's WM part deux is ludicrous.

As to the OP, no... TJ doesn't read like a long-con FSU fan, though it is oft repeated in here by people that he disagrees with to the point that it's funny to think about at least.

Pretty confident that UGA fans would be laughing at McGarity if we'd hired Mullen over Richt, as that objectively would have been a pretty "meh" hire. FWIW, given that UF didn't land Frost or Kelly, I think Mullen is a pretty good hire. The concern I would have is that he's getting paid like a guy who has already taken you to the promised land, or is going to ($6M/year - may not end up mattering in the long run as coaches salaries continue to increase, but it's an overspend IMO)... but he has a big job ahead of him. UF has had the talent base erode away under the last couple of years of Muschamp and then Mac... it's not an overnight job by most accounts. If he can piece together an offense in year 1 and get competitive, then figure out the immediate term 2019 and beyond QB solution, that will go a long way to righting the ship. LOS may be interesting as well, at least early... as that feels like a position of overall deficiency for UF right now on both sides of the ball if I just glance at the roster.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 1/31/18 at 5:27 pm to
I've always said he could be, not that he was. That he has some tendencies and I can post multiple times where I not only said that, but that I never said outright he is like Muschamp.

He has a ton of things that are similar -- his offensive vision, can't adjust to mobile quarterbacks ''because he has no tape on them'' and his attitude in general.

However, if he gets more coaching accumen and learns from his mistakes, he will escape the Muschamp style treatment, just never assume that bringing in amazing recruiting classes will save bad coaching.
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 1/31/18 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

I've always said he could be, not that he was. That he has some tendencies and I can post multiple times where I not only said that, but that I never said outright he is like Muschamp.


Agree to disagree... I don't bookmark shite like this because ultimately it doesn't matter, but I think the spirit of your comments has been quite clear, even if semantically this may be an accurate statement.

quote:

He has a ton of things that are similar -- his offensive vision, can't adjust to mobile quarterbacks ''because he has no tape on them'' and his attitude in general.


He's a defensive minded coach, his offensive "vision" is defined based on the talent available and what is going to best work with what we have. We had a totally different offensive approach in 2016 vs 2017... one worked, one didn't... not sure you can say you know what his "vision" is just yet.

We did just fine with mobile QBs in Brandon Wimbush, Nick Fitzgerald, and Jalen Hurts... not having a plan for replacing a QB in the second half who came out playing really well against what was (in retrospect) a poor decision to play soft defense to try and bleed clock. There were so many things that went into the outcome of that game, blaming Smart exclusively for that seems disingenuous to say the least. Can't control officiating, can't make your players run the play as it's called (final TD play for Alabama), etc...

quote:

just never assume that bringing in amazing recruiting classes will save bad coaching

Definitely not... but as of now, there isn't anything that would indicate that Smart is a "bad coach"... he may not be Saban, but he's not been a bad coach either, by any objective metric. 2018 will be interesting, as it will involve replacing a lot more starters on defense...

Either way, I'm happy with the trajectory at this time. If I'm wrong in the future, so be it.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 1/31/18 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

Agree to disagree... I don't bookmark shite like this because ultimately it doesn't matter, but I think the spirit of your comments has been quite clear, even if semantically this may be an accurate statement.



I've always maintained that the jury is still out and that he has good and bad qualities -- but not to just assume his Sabanhood (you addressed this in the end of your post, in your defense) so soon like a lot of other Georgia fans are.

quote:

We did just fine with mobile QBs in Brandon Wimbush, Nick Fitzgerald, and Jalen Hurts... not having a plan for replacing a QB in the second half who came out playing really well against what was (in retrospect) a poor decision to play soft defense to try and bleed clock. There were so many things that went into the outcome of that game, blaming Smart exclusively for that seems disingenuous to say the least. Can't control officiating, can't make your players run the play as it's called (final TD play for Alabama), etc...


You guys caught Wimbush and Fitzgerald very early in the year, which was fortunate -- and that is what I refer to in the end regarding the Alabama game. It wasn't just the refs, there were blown assignments all over the field and a freshman QB with very little real game experience came out and moved the ball with almost no effort.

Which is what reminds me of Muschamp. How else can you have star power and experience all over the field and still not be able to stop a running team through the air?

The problem here is: If Smart isn't as stubborn as Muschamp, everyone is in trouble. Georgia literally will be the next Alabama because there's so much in-state talent with pipelines all over.

Smart will massacre everyone until Florida gets back on the map, but even so we're constantly battling FSU/Miami and potentially UCF, and so we're just waiting to see what happens next year.

Will the defensive scheme change? That's what'll tell us he's growing as a coach, not necessarily his offensive scheme.
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 1/31/18 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

You guys caught Wimbush and Fitzgerald very early in the year, which was fortunate

We had a true freshman QB starting his first and third games ever... you could say the same for them. When we played them didn't magically make them worse... Fitzgerald had just played a fantastic game at home to lead a big win over LSU. You could argue that they weren't the same *caliber* of DT QB as Hurts or Tua, but the timing is a bit of a lame excuse.

quote:

and that is what I refer to in the end regarding the Alabama game. It wasn't just the refs, there were blown assignments all over the field and a freshman QB with very little real game experience came out and moved the ball with almost no effort.

You do realize, this is making my point for me, right? Blown assignments aren't necessarily due to bad coaching decisions... like the last play of the game... Kirby didn't "make a mistake" there... Dom Sanders simply bit on trying to play ball hawk on the underneath stuff instead of playing his assignment. That doesn't mean Kirby was perfect either, as I think both offensively and defensively, we played far too tight in the second half... but you do have to credit Saban for simply making a decision that literally only tGOAT (or another coach who felt like he was a teflon Don) could make... bench your starting QB who took you to the national championship game 2 years in a row for a true freshman. You can discount the idea that it was a QB that we hadn't prepared for, but he presented a passing threat that Hurts literally didn't. You knew what Hurts was going to do and we defended that well... Tua is significantly more accurate, which changes things quite a bit. I'd argue that *not* preparing for Tua at all, was a mistake... but hindsight is a hell of a thing.

quote:

Will the defensive scheme change? That's what'll tell us he's growing as a coach, not necessarily his offensive scheme.


I think we *wanted* to have a very different defensive scheme... the issue was simply that we didn't have enough talent (that was game ready) to put our corners on an island very often... Baker has become a very good corner, but the opposite side always needed help... whether it was Parrish or McGhee or even Aaron Davis working in the corner spot there. All season long, when you saw breakdowns in our pass defense it was some combination of one of those players coupled with the safety support they had/didn't have.

Not to get too UGA heavy here on your board, but it's why many of us see Tyson Campbell as the most important remaining target on the board. That would be the highest rated corner we have landed in a long time that I can recall... particularly if you discount Malcolm Mitchell or Mecole Hardman who both played both ways, but ended up settling into roles as WRs.

That's something that UF has seemingly *never* had a problem with... hell even when you don't land super highly rated guys, they've turned out pretty damn well. If I'm envious of any single position that UF has recruited over the past 10-20 years, it's gotta be DB. We've had some great safeties, but corner has been a struggle at times... at least to field 2 really good ones at any given time.




--- Back to UF now... ---




As far as UF goes, I've said before, it's multi-faceted... a) what is the patience level/expectation for Mullen... if year one isn't great, and then year 2 is only mediocre, is he in trouble in year 3 already? (not fired trouble, but hot-seat discussion) - $6M/year doesn't buy you a lot of "let's wait and see" IMO. b) and somewhat attached to that... how quickly can he rebuild the talent level there... as many people (yes... even TJ) pointed out, Mac pretty singlehandedly decimated the talent level there. You can put maybe some on Champ's last seasons, but Mac didn't seem to have that recruiting drive that you see in Saban, Kirby, or even Pruitt. If Mullen gets out-hustled on the recruiting trail by not just Saban and Kirby, but then Pruitt, Taggart, and Richt... it could be rough sledding. My guess is he'll be fine and have top 10-15 classes most years even if that *does* happen, but the issue of course becomes "relative success"... kind of like what we saw with Richt... he was always doing "good"... but not good relative to the teams that mattered (UF, Alabama, and LSU for example) when it came to the larger SEC picture. UF of course has to also deal with FSU yearly, and Miami occasionally (not sure what that arrangement looks like).

I've said elsewhere, but if Mullen can manage to either get EJ ready this year or next, you're probably in decent shape offensively, but will need to land some of those targets you guys are after on the OL to get things humming. If I had to pick a single recruit that I would like for UF to *not* have in the 2019 cycle (right now), it's David Baldwin... that is the kind of QB that I think would be retarded good in a Mullen offense. He's only a 3* composite right now, but he's a mid-range 4* on 247, and the offers are starting to swing his way (UF, UGA, and Ole Miss all just this week). Would have to imagine he ends up a composite 4* before all is said and done with at worst. More importantly, he's a 6'4", ~220lb QB who runs like a damn gazelle and can actually throw the ball into tight windows. I haven't had a chance to run through all of the 2019 recruits yet, but when I saw his film, I immediately said "please don't go to UF." :lol:
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 2/1/18 at 12:25 am to
I don't really want to get into the crux of what happened at Georgia simply because we talked about it -- however in the last game:

There were a few serious coaching mistakes that not only kept Alabama in the game, but allowed them to win it. Whether or not they're solely on Kirby (I personally don't feel this way, although I do think he got caught in the moment a bit) is up to debate, however: His offense played extremely conservative, and often times got stuffed and had to be bailed out by some amazingly good plays from Sony Michel.

His defense got shredded by playing sort of a soft zone ''give 'em just a little bit'' when really, we all kind of knew right away that they needed to get after Tua and make him beat you by balling out (I feel like Georgia gave up way too early on this, and didn't trust their CBs nearly enough).

I don't think it's necessarily bad, but I saw Muschamp do that shite a lot and ironically enough what happened against you guys happened against him.

Now, onto the McElwain bit:

McElwain walked into a very, very bad situation. He didn't have enough offensive linemen to run scrimmage at practice and the Florida ''brand'' had already been marred to some degree but Muschamp. McElwain, I feel, did as best as he possibly could while having to sell something that didn't look very palatable in state.

His biggest fault was the prestige part -- not an impressive guy. Mullen walks in with championship rings and a successful stint at one of the worst programs in the SEC and it's easy to see why he pulls in recruits.

Then there's the fact that McElwain just wasn't motivated. I mean, he beat Georgia (I have to laugh at this) and won the East two times in a row with basically a shadow of what Florida used to be. We know that the East has been shite, but at the very least he did what he could in a bad situation.

When the previous coach has left you two quarterbacks (one suspended for a year for PEDs), one offensive linemen with experience, one running back who isn't a freshman, some underperforming receivers a decent TE and a recruiting ranked class of #96 and a losing record against both in-state rivals -- that doesn't create an atmosphere for the next coach.

Worse off -- you can't hire a McElwain type of coach in that situation because it's obvious he just wanted to manage the game like an NFL guy. Just tell your lieutenants to take care of it while I kick back and try to fix some things here and there. Obviously, college is different -- you have to be in their ears all goddamn day, even if it's just telling your CBs and Safeties ''hey, don't let them behind you, play smart'' and McElwain clearly didn't have the energy to be that type of coach.

As for Mullen: I think we're gonna have to wash out the other QBs. Franks...god bless him, Trask has never played, Allen has never played and really we just don't have anything there for next year........

However, if Tua and Fromm have taught me anything -- it's that you can work around youth and get things clickin', and hopefully Mullen is the man for the job.
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 2/1/18 at 1:30 am to
quote:

Then there's the fact that McElwain just wasn't motivated. I mean, he beat Georgia (I have to laugh at this)

FWIW, winning in 2015 was not a feat... us trotting out Bautasaurus Rex just added insult to injury. The 2016 win was, on the other hand, baffling. As bad as we were, you guys really weren't better, and yet... we saw how it went. Chaney went full Chaney to say the least.

I know it's optimism time right now for Gators, so not really here to rain on that parade... I don't know that I see as much room for excitement as I've seen some mention... it seems like you're a little more level headed in your expectations from him though.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 2/1/18 at 2:19 am to
I think Mullen is a good fit for Florida and that he's going to have a bit more support from the AD (I mean they've worked together in the past and all that jazz) but he definitely has to do a lot.

I doubted the frick out of him when he let Corral go, but he must've had a plan because we landed EJ right after. I think the 2019 class is when he'll go after who he really wants, and we'll just have to see how things close out on NSD this year.

All I hope for right now is that we get back to at least competing for the East as apparently winning it wasn't up to our expectations -- Mullen has a little work to do, but he was at least left with a bunch of players who have actually been on the field, even if those fielded players didn't do so well.
Posted by Gatorbait2008
Member since Aug 2015
22953 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 7:45 pm to
Dan Mullen has a gold mind in a few areas on the field.

Top 3 RB group in the SEC(as shown by SECcountry as well)

I'd argue top 3 WR group when adding Watkins, Jefferson, and Grimes to players like Cleveland and Toney. Def highly rated players all over the place including Swain and Hammond.

DE/OLB we have a lot of talent that have proven themselves.

Two soph corners that are very good.


We have major issues as well too. MLB is weak, DT is weak, TE hasn't existed for years, Offensive line is experienced but struggled so wait and see if new coaching and S&C fixes that some. Safeties are a nightmare.

If Jones is a good QB. Our offense will be nasty next year. He has the talent to really move the ball with all the skill players if he is up to the task. Plenty of Freshman have started from day one and been good. No reason he couldn't. He has a strong run game and skill on the outside to help him out and let him grow.

If Jones isn't ready...well we are going to still suck despite the skill players.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

Dan Mullen has a gold mind in a few areas on the field.

Top 3 RB group in the SEC(as shown by SECcountry as well)

I'd argue top 3 WR group when adding Watkins, Jefferson, and Grimes to players like Cleveland and Toney. Def highly rated players all over the place including Swain and Hammond.



He got really lucky/did some real work getting Van Jefferson and Grimes -- but the McElwain/Muschamp guys: Pierce, Davis, Lemmons, Scarlett. I mean God DAMN that's a good backfield headed by a future Pro-RB.

Then you add in Toney, Cleveland, Watkins, blocking WRs in Swain and Hammond??? Really, if Mullen's offense when Harvin was involved has shown us anything it's that he will absolutely get it to his playmakers.

The problem is that at MSU you just can't get super highly rated playmakers outside of the QB to get out there on offense.

quote:

We have major issues as well too. MLB is weak, DT is weak, TE hasn't existed for years, Offensive line is experienced but struggled so wait and see if new coaching and S&C fixes that some. Safeties are a nightmare.



Eh, let's see the offensive line with an actual quarterback with a feel for the game and a staff that's going to get them in the right place. There are a lot of plays where Franks boneheadedly ran RIGHT into pressure simply by having no idea what's going on. Not because the line was bad, but just because his football IQ is so low that he couldn't read the field or the backfield, he'd just panic, pick a direction and end up getting sacked or running out.

The Safeties, though, whuff.

We have a few true freshman gamesmen coming in who I think could start day one, no real safety showed themselves well last season...however.

With the front seven look changing, I don't think the safeties will have to be so committed to running down SEC backs and can focus more on containment and coverage than getting their backs broken by bigger guys.

TE's will step up big this year, I think, that's an important aspect in Mullen's offense.

MLB will be alright now that we have actual backups and DT wil lbe okay I think.

All in all, McElwain left a decent, young and talented team that just needs a whole lot of direction, coaching and motivation. A real leader, you know, someone who goes on runs at 5 AM with the team.
Posted by Gatorbait2008
Member since Aug 2015
22953 posts
Posted on 2/4/18 at 1:45 am to
Agree. We needed a training program and a good coach who knows what to do with talent.

That RB and WR core is dangerous. I expect points.
Posted by Gatorbait2008
Member since Aug 2015
22953 posts
Posted on 2/6/18 at 3:30 pm to
Right now this troll is trying to claim that Addazio is as good of an OC as Mullen was.

It's...baffling we let him keep the name Gator in his profile.
Posted by UFMatt
Gator Nation - Everywhere
Member since Oct 2010
11428 posts
Posted on 2/8/18 at 9:27 am to
Most the Negagators are pretty quiet today, Mullen did a great job with this class and finished strong. They can't ever spin this negatively. The future is bright and they hate it!
Posted by BloodSweat&Beers
One Particular Harbor, Fl
Member since Jan 2012
9153 posts
Posted on 2/8/18 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Most the Negagators are pretty quiet today, Mullen did a great job with this class and finished strong. They can't ever spin this negatively. The future is bright and they hate it!


Mullen had a shot at 3 top instate OLs that were UF leans at the time of his arrival and UF only got 1. Also no DTs or CBs in this class with Silvera going to Miami and Boykin going to ND. Boykin stings, we could have gone after Taiyon Palmer who picked NC ST over the Vols and late runs by Bama and Clemson.

The really good thing is that we did not reach just to fill slots. What we did reach for is OL and Hevesy does have a history of developing OLs.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 2/8/18 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Mullen had a shot at 3 top instate OLs that were UF leans at the time of his arrival and UF only got 1.


That's kind of unfair as:

NPF always was a big mystery with everyone just reading tea leaves. Saying he's a ''UF Lean'' isn't actually truthful because he never really let anyone know what he was really thinking.

So 1 for 2 is more ''fair''.

quote:

1. Also no DTs or CBs in this class with Silvera going to Miami and Boykin going to ND.


Watkins and Dean can both be converted into CB and I think will see time. DT is a need but not a huge this year but next year we will be able to offer some serious playing time.

quote:

The really good thing is that we did not reach just to fill slots. What we did reach for is OL and Hevesy does have a history of developing OLs


The good news is that the players we took on won't necessarily be playing right away, at least the green horns won't. Almost our entire line is coming back for at least one more year, and so it's possible that we'll be able to get some meat, work in some footwork and get everything will be okay.

quote:

Most the Negagators are pretty quiet today, Mullen did a great job with this class and finished strong. They can't ever spin this negatively. The future is bright and they hate it!


There are still a few, but this is the highest class Mullen has ever signed and with only 19 players counted toward it, along with the highest average.
Posted by BloodSweat&Beers
One Particular Harbor, Fl
Member since Jan 2012
9153 posts
Posted on 2/8/18 at 12:21 pm to
quote:


That's kind of unfair as:

NPF always was a big mystery with everyone just reading tea leaves. Saying he's a ''UF Lean'' isn't actually truthful because he never really let anyone know what he was really thinking.

So 1 for 2 is more ''fair''.


Ohio State, Bama, Clemson, FSU, Miami, and UGA do not play "fair". NPF was an instate OL. His interest in Ohio State was late in the process. It counts as an L for this staff.

Watkins and Dean can both be converted into CB and I think will see time. DT is a need but not a huge this year but next year we will be able to offer some serious playing time.

Watkins should be on offense. He is a dynamic player with the ball. UF needs that type of player on offense.

I agree that Dean could play CB but there was a need for at least one true CB.

DTs need at least a year to develop to play in the SEC. Relying on a freshman at DT is a great way to get the ball shoved down your throat. In the 3-4 you need one run stuffer every cycle.

quote:

The good news is that the players we took on won't necessarily be playing right away, at least the green horns won't. Almost our entire line is coming back for at least one more year, and so it's possible that we'll be able to get some meat, work in some footwork and get everything will be okay.


The OL is going to be a mess next year. They are completely changing schemes. There was a lack of organization and good OL calls by our centers. McDowell may have to start.

quote:


There are still a few, but this is the highest class Mullen has ever signed and with only 19 players counted toward it, along with the highest average.


It better be his highest class, he was recruiting kids to Miss State.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 2/8/18 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Ohio State, Bama, Clemson, FSU, Miami, and UGA do not play "fair". NPF was an instate OL. His interest in Ohio State was late in the process. It counts as an L for this staff.


That's...not how this works or how I was using the word ''fair''. You said they were ''Gator leans'' and I provided you evidence that one very much so was not as most people have no idea who was actually trending as evidenced by many experts picking it incorrectly.

quote:

Watkins should be on offense. He is a dynamic player with the ball. UF needs that type of player on offense.


Maybe. He plays offense and defense and could also be a sort of player like that at UF where he plays Nickel on defense and occasionally fills in on slot for Toney.

quote:

DTs need at least a year to develop to play in the SEC. Relying on a freshman at DT is a great way to get the ball shoved down your throat. In the 3-4 you need one run stuffer every cycle.



Yeah, you're not tracking this conversation pretty well.

We have Dunlap (JR, 6'3'' 328 pounds), Slaton (SO, 6'4'' 349) and Campbell (SO, 6'3'' 323) for our bigs so we're good for about a year and I doubt Dunlap leaves early. Then we have almost 4 other bodies of serviceable guys so it's not an immediate need.

Even if we bring in a guy next year, he'll have a year to fill in for injuries or fatigue.

quote:

The OL is going to be a mess next year. They are completely changing schemes. There was a lack of organization and good OL calls by our centers. McDowell may have to start.


Our OL didn't look that bad this year even when they were hindered by terrible playcalling and QB play. The system is more simple, not as complicated as the atrocity Nussmeier was trying to walk on the field.

quote:

It better be his highest class, he was recruiting kids to Miss State.



Hm, his highest class ever was achieved in what, three months? That's not even including transfers. There were no ''L's'' in trying to salvage a class, Mullen did what needed to be done to be fourth in the SEC -- highest since 2013.

Can we stop giving coaches shite for doing well?
Posted by BloodSweat&Beers
One Particular Harbor, Fl
Member since Jan 2012
9153 posts
Posted on 2/8/18 at 3:48 pm to
quote:


That's...not how this works or how I was using the word ''fair''. You said they were ''Gator leans'' and I provided you evidence that one very much so was not as most people have no idea who was actually trending as evidenced by many experts picking it incorrectly.



Being "fair" to the staff is making an excuse for the staff.

Your evidence is your opinion. That is biased. NPF visited UF multiple times. Took one of his 5 OVs to UF. Proximity and academics were high priorities for NPF, UF had the advantage in proximity and UF has very good academics if sold with the new Academic center. Those are facts pointing to the opinion that he was a UF lean. NPF was there for the taking. Hevesy did not close. They also let Barnes slip away in favor of 2 Miss State level recruits.

quote:


Maybe. He plays offense and defense and could also be a sort of player like that at UF where he plays Nickel on defense and occasionally fills in on slot for Toney.


Asking a true freshman to learn both offense and defense is difficult. Pick one, let him learn that, then in a year or two try both. No matter what Watkins should get a shot at PR/KR.

As for Toney, he should be a 5 - 10 touch guy. He is not durable.

quote:

Yeah, you're not tracking this conversation pretty well.

We have Dunlap (JR, 6'3'' 328 pounds), Slaton (SO, 6'4'' 349) and Campbell (SO, 6'3'' 323) for our bigs so we're good for about a year and I doubt Dunlap leaves early. Then we have almost 4 other bodies of serviceable guys so it's not an immediate need.

Even if we bring in a guy next year, he'll have a year to fill in for injuries or fatigue.


You don't recruit DTs for immediate needs. Recruiting is not reactive, it is proactive especially with the bigger guys. DTs take at least a year for a super talented guy to develop, more than likely two years. Ivie, Brantley, and Bryan did not preform at UF DT level until senior year. It is a gap that could come back to haunt us.

While not as bad, the Muschamp class with no LBs still haunts this team due to depth issues.


quote:


Our OL didn't look that bad this year even when they were hindered by terrible playcalling and QB play. The system is more simple, not as complicated as the atrocity Nussmeier was trying to walk on the field.



While they did run block better and the play calling was shite, they could not pick up blitzes or block in space.

Show me one game were our OL consistently blocked well on RB screen plays. They were horrible in space and whiffed on blocks especially Ivey. Our OL could not make OL calls to pick up A gap blitzes. Often both guys would make it through.

quote:

Hm, his highest class ever was achieved in what, three months? That's not even including transfers. There were no ''L's'' in trying to salvage a class, Mullen did what needed to be done to be fourth in the SEC -- highest since 2013.

Can we stop giving coaches shite for doing well?


Because 4th best in the SEC is not good enough.

I am excited for the future with Mullen
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 2/8/18 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Being "fair" to the staff is making an excuse for the staff.

Your evidence is your opinion. That is biased. NPF visited UF multiple times. Took one of his 5 OVs to UF. Proximity and academics were high priorities for NPF, UF had the advantage in proximity and UF has very good academics if sold with the new Academic center. Those are facts pointing to the opinion that he was a UF lean. NPF was there for the taking. Hevesy did not close. They also let Barnes slip away in favor of 2 Miss State level recruits.



That's not how that works, again. It's not biased to say no one actually knew what NPF was thinking. He was a Florida lean on speculation alone. It's called giving the benefit of the doubt, ''innocent until proven guilty''. We have no idea what NPF was actually thinking and if he was a Gator lean, that is speculation and bias from your side.

quote:

Asking a true freshman to learn both offense and defense is difficult. Pick one, let him learn that, then in a year or two try both. No matter what Watkins should get a shot at PR/KR.

As for Toney, he should be a 5 - 10 touch guy. He is not durable.


I could see him getting time on both sides of the ball anyway. He's already playing both sides in college and could relieve Toney on offense and play in dime on defense without a hitch.

quote:

You don't recruit DTs for immediate needs. Recruiting is not reactive, it is proactive especially with the bigger guys. DTs take at least a year for a super talented guy to develop, more than likely two years. Ivie, Brantley, and Bryan did not preform at UF DT level until senior year. It is a gap that could come back to haunt us.



That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying we're three deep for at least another year, and will be two deep next year. We could take a guy next year and he'd easily have a year to develop before he even sees the field. It wasn't that big of a deal for DT -- especially when LB was the position of interest for this class and for the foreseeable future.

quote:

Because 4th best in the SEC is not good enough.

I am excited for the future with Mullen


It's a transition class where our coach only had three months to work.

McElwain's was 10th in the SEC.

Muschamp's was 5th.

Meyer's was 3rd.

The biggest differences here are:

Meyer: Had a great recruiter before him, Zook was phenomenal.

Muschamp: Was riding the coattails of a multiple national championship winning HC.

McElwain: Couldn't repair the damage done by Muschamp and recruited poorly.

Mullen: Has to now fix the damage of two previous HCs who clearly did not have the capacity nor desire to run a big program.

Considering the context, having the second best transitional class after the shitshow we've seen over the past decade, that's pretty impressive.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter