Started By
Message
Rate our position Groups
Posted on 8/20/19 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 8/20/19 at 3:02 pm
QB: A- (only because of backup uncertainty)
RB: A
OL: A+
WR: B+
TE: B
DL: B
OLB: A
MLB: A-
CB: A
S: A
K: A+
P: B-
RB: A
OL: A+
WR: B+
TE: B
DL: B
OLB: A
MLB: A-
CB: A
S: A
K: A+
P: B-
This post was edited on 8/20/19 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 8/20/19 at 3:24 pm to diddlydawg7
quote:
QB: A- (only because of backup uncertainty)
RB: A
call me a homer but im giving A+ to both here.
we have a top 3 QB in the country. how much does depth matter here? last year, you'd probably give us an A+ and it didnt help at all, probably even hurt.
as for running backs, if we aren't an A+, then who in the frick is?
Posted on 8/20/19 at 3:32 pm to diddlydawg7
Man I remember in Richt's tenure we never even cared who the backups were.
Rarely did we have 22 studs that could play.
Now we get anxious because we have backups that wouldn't be able to fill in and not miss a beat.
It's damn great to be a Georgia Bulldawg these days
Rarely did we have 22 studs that could play.
Now we get anxious because we have backups that wouldn't be able to fill in and not miss a beat.
It's damn great to be a Georgia Bulldawg these days
Posted on 8/20/19 at 3:32 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
as for running backs, if we aren't an A+, then who in the frick is?
I don't necessarily think it's a slight to say A instead of A+, primarily because of depth. 2017 I would call a texbook example of A+ with a proven and elite sony and chubb, to go along with swift.
This year we have proven swift, an unproven but talented zamir, herrien who is a fine backup but wouldn't start for most teams, cook who has yet to really find his place, and mcintosh. That's not bad at all but I wouldn't necessarily give it the highest grade you possibly can either.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 3:42 pm to WG_Dawg
I guess my biggest issue is that RB has the same rating as OLB, CB, and safety.
RB is much better than those positions IMO.
Also, MLB at A- seems high.
RB is much better than those positions IMO.
Also, MLB at A- seems high.
This post was edited on 8/20/19 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 8/20/19 at 3:44 pm to WG_Dawg
QB: B+ (needs to win a big game without Chubb/Michel)
RB: A
OL: A+
WR: A- (projecting here but I think we're more explosive)
TE: C+
DL: C+
OLB: A+
MLB: B+
CB: A-
S: A
K: A+
P: B-
RB: A
OL: A+
WR: A- (projecting here but I think we're more explosive)
TE: C+
DL: C+
OLB: A+
MLB: B+
CB: A-
S: A
K: A+
P: B-
Posted on 8/20/19 at 3:55 pm to jodeaux
QB: A (Better than almost anyone in the country at this position including depth issues)
RB: A+
OL: A+
WR: B (Will be higher by end of season)
TE: C+
DL: B+
OLB: A
MLB: A-
CB: A
S: A+ (Lecounte is going to make some believers this year)
K: A+
P: B-
RB: A+
OL: A+
WR: B (Will be higher by end of season)
TE: C+
DL: B+
OLB: A
MLB: A-
CB: A
S: A+ (Lecounte is going to make some believers this year)
K: A+
P: B-
Posted on 8/20/19 at 4:01 pm to chillmonster
quote:
Lecounte is going to make some believers this year
I just want to see him wrap up for once.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 4:07 pm to Dawgsontop34
quote:
RB is much better than those positions IMO.
We have health concerns at RB.
Swift and White can't be considered reliably healthy based upon their history.
It is one thing to have talent and skill. But those players have to play at that level on the field for it to help the team.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 4:20 pm to diddlydawg7
QB: A
RB: A
OL: A+
WR: B+
TE: B+
DL: B
OLB: A
MLB: A-
CB: A
S: A
K: A+
P: B-
RB: A
OL: A+
WR: B+
TE: B+
DL: B
OLB: A
MLB: A-
CB: A
S: A
K: A+
P: B-
Posted on 8/20/19 at 4:30 pm to diddlydawg7
QB: A
RB-A
WR- B
TE-B
OL- A+
DL- B+
OLB- B+
MLB- B
CB- B+
S- A-
K-A+
P- B-
RB-A
WR- B
TE-B
OL- A+
DL- B+
OLB- B+
MLB- B
CB- B+
S- A-
K-A+
P- B-
Posted on 8/20/19 at 4:30 pm to FlatwoodsForester
QB: A
RB: A
OL: A+
WR: C
TE: B
DL: C
OLB: A-
MLB: A-
CB: A
S: A
K: A+
P: B+
RB: A
OL: A+
WR: C
TE: B
DL: C
OLB: A-
MLB: A-
CB: A
S: A
K: A+
P: B+
Posted on 8/20/19 at 5:36 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
2017 I would call a texbook example of A+ with a proven and elite sony and chubb, to go along with swift.
i mean, yeah on this scale, there have been like 5 A+ running back groups ever.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 5:48 pm to diddlydawg7
quote:
QB: A
RB: A
OL: A+
WR: B-
TE: C-Not enough depth. If Charley goes down we're screwed
DL: B-
OLB: A
MLB: B
CB: A
S: A
K: A+
P: B-
Posted on 8/20/19 at 5:55 pm to diddlydawg7
QB: A+ (The starter is all I care about)
RB: A+ (Best/Deepest in the nation)
OL: A+
WR: B- (Unproven)
TE: B-
DL: B- (Would be B+ if Rochester and Marshall was 100%. Hopefully by midseason they will be ready)
OLB: A+ (5* Deep)
MLB: A
CB: A
S: A
K: A (Won't make em all)
P: B-
RB: A+ (Best/Deepest in the nation)
OL: A+
WR: B- (Unproven)
TE: B-
DL: B- (Would be B+ if Rochester and Marshall was 100%. Hopefully by midseason they will be ready)
OLB: A+ (5* Deep)
MLB: A
CB: A
S: A
K: A (Won't make em all)
P: B-
Posted on 8/21/19 at 4:15 pm to diddlydawg7
QB. B-
RB. A
Wr. B
Te. B
OL. A
Dl. A
CB. C
S. B
K. A
P. A
RB. A
Wr. B
Te. B
OL. A
Dl. A
CB. C
S. B
K. A
P. A
Posted on 8/21/19 at 4:29 pm to Bossbailey34
quote:
Bossbailey34
Are you drunk?
Posted on 8/21/19 at 4:34 pm to Dawgsontop34
Couldn't find a good solid Christmas Tree Scantron gif...
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News