Started By
Message
Here Possible Targeting Rule Modification...Points or Player Ejections
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:16 pm
If targeting is verified, the head coach has the option of either allowing the player to be ejected or give up points in exchange. I say 3 points if the difference is say less than 14 points. I would give up 7 points if the score difference is greater than 7 points. The reason I say this is because in the case of a blowout, a coach may not care giving up 3 points if the team is up by 3 TD’s.
Either way, the foul is recognized and the head coach of that player gets a way of keeping on the field if needed.
Either way, the foul is recognized and the head coach of that player gets a way of keeping on the field if needed.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:17 pm to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
give up points in exchange
You can't actually be this stupid, can you?
quote:
Clemson fan
Oh, wait, I guess you can. My bad.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:17 pm to lewis and herschel
If a UGA fan requested it you would like it...LOL
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:18 pm to CU_Tigers4life
Sorry, but this is a very bad idea
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:18 pm to CU_Tigers4life
Hey Clemson, frick off.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:19 pm to CU_Tigers4life
You are the big stupid
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:19 pm to TigerFan4040
No...PS..Make the playoffs so we can beat you again.
Signed: Clemson
Signed: Clemson
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:19 pm to CU_Tigers4life
I think they should just use common sense - was it intentionally malicious? Yes - 15 yards and ejection.
No - 15 yards and no ejection.
Was it helmet to helmet but ticky tack?
Yes - no foul.
No - 15 yards and no ejection.
Was it helmet to helmet but ticky tack?
Yes - no foul.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:20 pm to YoungTigah
quote:
You are the big stupid
Would you have given up 3 points in the Miss State game to have your player start in the Bama game?
Simple yes or no...
This post was edited on 10/24/18 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:21 pm to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
If a UGA fan requested it you would like it...LOL
Oh, you're a girl.
Pics?
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:21 pm to Teague
quote:
I think they should just use common sense - was it intentionally malicious? Yes - 15 yards and ejection.
No - 15 yards and no ejection.
Was it helmet to helmet but ticky tack?
Yes - no foul
Because if there's one thing people love, it's letting referees make judgement calls.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:22 pm to CU_Tigers4life
So once your team is up by a comfortable margin they can lay caution to the wind and light the other team the frick up?
sounds like a great plan.
sounds like a great plan.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:23 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
Because if there's one thing people love, it's letting referees make judgement calls.
It's always going to come down to judgement calls.
Whatever they do though, I think they need to dial back on all this targeting a bit.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:23 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
So once your team is up by a comfortable margin they can lay caution to the wind and light the other team the frick up?
sounds like a great plan.
That used to be the way it was done before and it was called a personal foul and a 15 yard penalty. It is a contact sport
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:25 pm to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
That used to be the way it was done before and it was called a personal foul and a 15 yard penalty. It is a contact sport
Yeah but why should the currently winning team be able to break rules with less consequences than the team trying to come from behind?
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News