Started By
Message

re: Breaking news: New saliva test approved. Game changer

Posted on 8/15/20 at 2:26 pm to
Posted by chillmonster
Atlanta, GA
Member since Dec 2018
5073 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 2:26 pm to
They don't have to test every day unless they find a positive test. Once or twice a week will suffice.

Test half on Monday and half on Wednesday and before every game. These programs can stomach a $40,000 testing bill for a season of football.
Posted by da prophet
hammond, la
Member since Sep 2013
2305 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 2:28 pm to
A ten times cheaper test with a quick turnaround certainly is a game changer. IMO the liberal conferences reacted way to early, still well over a month until games.
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18184 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 2:29 pm to
Not if it yields a bunch of false positives like the PCR test does.
Posted by bigdawg7780
SC
Member since Oct 2013
2793 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 2:30 pm to
Posted by Freight Joker
Member since Aug 2019
2786 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 2:32 pm to
wHy wErE ThEsE tEsT nOt AvAiLaBlE iN mArCh!?
Posted by phil4bama
Emerald Coast of PCB
Member since Jul 2011
11458 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 3:01 pm to
quote:


Not if it yields a bunch of false positives like the PCR test does.


Reports are it is high 80’s to low 90’s percent accurate. Back it up with a second sample and the accuracy rises to 99%.

LINK
Posted by TchPowDog
Zachary, LA
Member since Sep 2015
4798 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 3:13 pm to
This isn't "breaking" or "new" information. The NBA has been using it in trials since they started back. The B1G and Pac12 knew about this before they cancelled and the saliva test being approved was widely known to be imminent... fwiw
Posted by phil4bama
Emerald Coast of PCB
Member since Jul 2011
11458 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 3:22 pm to
So as has already been stated, the B1G and cronies were looking for an excuse to cancel.
Posted by Tuscaloosa
11x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
46668 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 3:24 pm to
WT21 is really upset by this news. Shut it down!!1!
Posted by Whiznot
Albany, GA
Member since Oct 2013
7010 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

anticipate the left finding a way to denounce this asap.

The left, right and middle have all called for more and faster testing. Only Trump and his minions disagree.
Posted by TchPowDog
Zachary, LA
Member since Sep 2015
4798 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Reports are it is high 80’s to low 90’s percent accurate. Back it up with a second sample and the accuracy rises to 99%.



That's not quite how Math/statistics works. Consult Bayes theorem.

What would you say the percentage of catching the disease is? For anyone, just in general, what is that percent chance?
This post was edited on 8/15/20 at 3:48 pm
Posted by AustinKnight
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
5842 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 3:58 pm to
If a patient is swabbed correctly PCR is the most accurate molecular test available and there is no debate in this. 99%
This post was edited on 8/15/20 at 6:04 pm
Posted by Littleman75
Oxford, MS
Member since Jul 2018
44 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 4:00 pm to
Posted by phil4bama
Emerald Coast of PCB
Member since Jul 2011
11458 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

uote:
Reports are it is high 80’s to low 90’s percent accurate. Back it up with a second sample and the accuracy rises to 99%.



That's not quite how Math/statistics works. Consult Bayes theorem.

What would you say the percentage of catching the disease is? For anyone, just in general, what is that percent chance?



I was referencing the original Twitter message. That's what it said. I'm no mathematician, but if the test is administered properly AND you get 2 of the same result, I think that would definitely approach 99% accuracy. I don't have the breakdown of false positive vs false negative to do an exact calculation but I would have to believe a double positive or negative would have to be highly accurate and predictive.
Posted by TchPowDog
Zachary, LA
Member since Sep 2015
4798 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

I'm no mathematician, but if the test is administered properly AND you get 2 of the same result, I think that would definitely approach 99% accuracy.

No. Like I said, that's not how it works.

If the the test was 80% accurate and the chance of actually getting the virus was like 20%, then a second test of negative would be 80% accurate... Bayes theorem. Look it up, there's a formula.
Posted by MeatPants
Member since Nov 2015
8853 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 8:29 pm to
Isn’t this what baseball is using

It’s not really stopping any spread once someone has it

They are canceling games every day
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
32685 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

I wouldn’t call it cheap considering you are testing about 200 people per day, but it works.
60k a month. 4 months so 240k

Do you realize how much is at stake for these athletic departments if football isn’t played? Literally tens of millions of dollars
Posted by RightWingTiger
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2003
5319 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

anticipate the left finding a way to denounce this asap.

Its RACIST!!!
Posted by GusAU
Member since Mar 2014
3663 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

wHy wErE ThEsE tEsT nOt AvAiLaBlE iN mArCh!?

Why do some morons type like this?
Posted by RightWingTiger
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2003
5319 posts
Posted on 8/15/20 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

He thought COVID was the end of humanity.
You must not know ANY Liberals! I wish I didn’t!!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter