Started By
Message

Arkansas and aTm in old SEC

Posted on 4/7/20 at 1:23 pm
Posted by Taco Truck
Member since Dec 2019
381 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 1:23 pm
If Ark and aTm had been original members of the SEC and never played in the old SWC, what would their history look like? Would Ark have even competed for a National Title in the 60's?
Posted by Hawgeye
tFlagship Brothel
Member since Jun 2009
31085 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 1:32 pm to
What if the SEC football schedule would have had more than 5 or 6 conference games for all of those years that you reference?

8 team league and only had some teams 5 or 6 league games. How stupid is that?

This post was edited on 4/7/20 at 1:40 pm
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30459 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 1:41 pm to
Arky and aggy would have split the wins and Arky would STILL have an advantage.


Furthermore, Arky is the one that had the balls to come to the sec and actually won the west three times.

Aggy has to be asked twice. Once they figured out they couldn’t win a shite conference, they said;

“Hey, lets just get our asses beat for more money in the sec and pay our coach more”
Posted by dchog
Pea ridge
Member since Nov 2012
21361 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 1:42 pm to
Yes if you beat Texas in the 60s then you are very likely SWC champs and competed for the national title.
Posted by VagueMessage
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Jun 2013
3907 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 2:23 pm to
We won a title in the 60s, and were basically Georgia under Richt throughout the 70s and 80s. We've just made bad coaching hires since the 90s, with the exception of Petrino.

The SEC wasn't the beast it was today back then. Both A&M and Arkansas would have made a splash. Arkansas will eventually get its shite back together at some point.
Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
25223 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

If Ark and aTm had been original members of the SEC and never played in the old SWC, what would their history look like? Would Ark have even competed for a National Title in the 60's?




That depends. Playing in the SWC gave us a great pipeline of talent from Texas. Was the Arkansas (assuming we still had that pipeline going) program capable of competing in and doing well against the SEC in the 60s? Yes, we had legit talent back then. The national title we claim came in a season we were undefeated and beat Texas. Texas, it should be noted, handed Alabama a loss that year.

Arkansas was quite good in the 70s and 80s and were a legit national power for many of those years. What killed us off was Broyles driving Hatfield away and then a series of either disastrous or mediocre at best hires.

Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
20540 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:18 pm to
Arkansas needs Texas talent. They really should move to the big 12.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84887 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:23 pm to
I don't think either would be much different, though A&M would have bailed on the conference by now.
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71571 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

If Ark and aTm had been original members of the SEC and never played in the old SWC, what would their history look like? Would Ark have even competed for a National Title in the 60's?




Wasnt the SWC the SEC of the past?
Posted by Manzielathon
Death Valley
Member since Sep 2013
8951 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:58 pm to
Most Arkansas posters weren’t even alive the last time they beat Texas A&M
Posted by Mr Sausage
Cat Spring, Texas
Member since Oct 2011
12844 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:59 pm to
Behind Bama. Just where we like to be.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter