Started By
Message

NCAA total offense: Clemson #3, scoring defense #1, total defense #2
Posted on 1/12/20 at 10:57 am
Posted on 1/12/20 at 10:57 am
LSU #1 total offense, #29 scoring defense and #29 in total defense. Hmmmmm.
Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:00 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
How many ranked teams has Clemson played? Now do LSU.
Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:00 am to SadUCFKnight
LSU would have a top 5 defense if they played in the ACC 

Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:03 am to SadUCFKnight
Trying too hard, sport.
Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:06 am to SadUCFKnight
Does all this mean Clemson can't lose?
Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:08 am to SadUCFKnight
they play each other tomorrow night so it's kind of academic today
Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:10 am to John Milner
If you so sure, you should go bet some money! Let me know how those stats work out for you.
Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:11 am to SadUCFKnight
just here for the downvote
#19
#19
This post was edited on 1/12/20 at 11:12 am
Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:12 am to SadUCFKnight
quote:Hmmmmm.
SadUCFKnight
The LSU 15 game winning streak started with the 2019 PlayStation Fiesta Bowl

This post was edited on 1/12/20 at 11:14 am
Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:14 am to Wolfhound45
NCAA turnovers gained:
Clemson #5
LSU #19
Clemson #5
LSU #19
Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:24 am to SadUCFKnight
College football stats are USELESS!
STATS, in general, are ALL encompassing and the results are repeatable.
In college football, stats are pocket driven (conferences for the most part) as well as injuries / suspensions ALWAYS play are part in the numbers.
So if your saying that relative to their conf, Clemson was better, you are correct. If you are saying that LSU relative to their conf. is better, you are correct, but to try and compare LSU to Clemson based on stats is pointless.
The one place you MIGHT be able to make some logical comparison is on a common opponent. Try A&M numbers and get back to me. How well did Clemson do against A&M and by what percentage did they exceed A&M's numbers?
STATS, in general, are ALL encompassing and the results are repeatable.
In college football, stats are pocket driven (conferences for the most part) as well as injuries / suspensions ALWAYS play are part in the numbers.
So if your saying that relative to their conf, Clemson was better, you are correct. If you are saying that LSU relative to their conf. is better, you are correct, but to try and compare LSU to Clemson based on stats is pointless.
The one place you MIGHT be able to make some logical comparison is on a common opponent. Try A&M numbers and get back to me. How well did Clemson do against A&M and by what percentage did they exceed A&M's numbers?
Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:33 am to SadUCFKnight
NCAA National Championship in football.
LSU - 3
UCF - 0
LSU - 3
UCF - 0
Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:34 am to SadUCFKnight
Easy to turnovers against shitty ACC comoetition
Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:37 am to oneg8rh8r
Here, I did it for you.
A&M avg/gm for the yr.
Total yards: 394
Passing yards: 235
Rushing yards: 159
points / gm: 29.54
Against Clemson vs their avg:
total yards: 289 vs 394 ~ 105 less
passing: 236 vs 235 ~ 1 better
rushing: 53 vs 159 ~ 106 less
points / gm: 18 vs 29.54 ~11.54 less
Against LSU vs their avg:
total yards: 169 vs 394 ~ 225 less
passing: 97 vs 235 ~ 138 less
rushing: 72 vs 159 ~ 87 less
points / gm: 7 vs 29.54 ~ 22.64 less
Yeah, you may be on to something here, go place that bet.

A&M avg/gm for the yr.
Total yards: 394
Passing yards: 235
Rushing yards: 159
points / gm: 29.54
Against Clemson vs their avg:
total yards: 289 vs 394 ~ 105 less
passing: 236 vs 235 ~ 1 better
rushing: 53 vs 159 ~ 106 less
points / gm: 18 vs 29.54 ~11.54 less
Against LSU vs their avg:
total yards: 169 vs 394 ~ 225 less
passing: 97 vs 235 ~ 138 less
rushing: 72 vs 159 ~ 87 less
points / gm: 7 vs 29.54 ~ 22.64 less
Yeah, you may be on to something here, go place that bet.


Posted on 1/12/20 at 11:40 am to SadUCFKnight
Do you ever provide a reasonable take on anything?
Back to top
