Started By
Message

re: Auburn police have arrested 16 y/o for manslaughter in death of RB and wife

Posted on 7/2/19 at 9:06 pm to
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 7/2/19 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

He made an awful mistake but it was not an intentional one


We don’t know what his intentions were when the wreck happened.

He could have been suicidal, mad at society, any number of things. Sonetimes things that look like mistakes aren’t mistakes.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 7/2/19 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

It all depends on the facts of the case


Exactly and none of us know all the facts. Which is why it can’t be brushed off as just a ‘mistake’ right now.
This post was edited on 7/2/19 at 9:26 pm
Posted by N97883
New Dehli Forsyth GA
Member since Nov 2013
8063 posts
Posted on 7/2/19 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

I’m convinced he fell asleep while his foot was on the pedal


I think the natural thing for your foot to do when you fall asleep at the wheel is retract from the pedal not push on it.

Dont ask me how I know.
Posted by Rig
BHM
Member since Aug 2011
41856 posts
Posted on 7/2/19 at 10:13 pm to
I wouldn’t know, but I think it could be believable that he fell asleep and the weight of his foot pushed the gas pedal. It would also line up with his initial report that he was asleep and couldn’t recollect anything
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
12828 posts
Posted on 7/2/19 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

I think the natural thing for your foot to do when you fall asleep at the wheel is retract from the pedal not push on i


The only experience I’ve had with this was following someone who had fallen asleep. They accelerated. I noticed we went from around 60 to 80.
Posted by Broadside Bob
Atlanta, GA
Member since Dec 2012
1096 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:36 am to
quote:

quote:If you are stoned and going 90 Dude if you are driving stoned, you are not going 90 mph.


Could we please stop arguing the facts when NONE of us have access to the facts. Here are the facts we do know:

- A young man appears to have made a series of poor choices. As a result, his life has irretrievably been changed for the worse. As I said in an earlier post, until shown otherwise, I'm going to assume the young man feels the regret and remorse that anyone who is not a sociopath would feel.

- Two innocent lives were lost as a result of his choice.

- Law enforcement investigation shows excessive speed as well as impairment due to marijuana use.

- Due to all of the above, the young man will be held accountable for his actions as it appears some punishment is due. Let's let the criminal justice system due it's job.

THE END
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
49129 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:51 am to
quote:

- A young man appears to have made a series of poor choices. As a result, his life has irretrievably been changed for the worse. As I said in an earlier post, until shown otherwise, I'm going to assume the young man feels the regret and remorse that anyone who is not a sociopath would feel.

- Two innocent lives were lost as a result of his choice.

- Law enforcement investigation shows excessive speed as well as impairment due to marijuana use.

- Due to all of the above, the young man will be held accountable for his actions as it appears some punishment is due. Let's let the criminal justice system due it's job.


I'd even argue that we don't know if he made a "series of poor choices." The only poor choice may have been trying to drive home if he was severely exhausted.

To me, the marijuana in his system does not prove anything.

He will be held accountable. I expect he will take a deal, and serve a year in prison with tons of probation, community service, etc.

Kid's life is already ruined as well.
Posted by AUCatfish
How are yah now?
Member since Oct 2007
13995 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 10:18 am to
quote:

impairment due to marijuana use.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't ALEA just say that there was THC in his blood? There is a presumed assumption of impairment but the kid could have smoked 4 days before and it could show up positive on a blood test.
Posted by JamalSanders
On a boat
Member since Jul 2015
12135 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't ALEA just say that there was THC in his blood?


You are correct.

quote:

There is a presumed assumption of impairment but the kid could have smoked 4 days before and it could show up positive on a blood test.


That depends on how often he smoked. An everyday smoker, yeah it could still be in his blood if he wasn't impaired. A weekend recreational smoker, probably wouldn't be in his blood 4 days later.

Regardless, it was in his blood at the time of the tox screen at the hospital and he more than likely will serve time in jail.
Posted by AUCatfish
How are yah now?
Member since Oct 2007
13995 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Regardless, it was in his blood at the time of the tox screen at the hospital and he more than likely will serve time in jail.


I think this is the law in Alabama, doesn't matter when you did it, just that it's in your blood stream.

Posted by JamalSanders
On a boat
Member since Jul 2015
12135 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

I think this is the law in Alabama, doesn't matter when you did it, just that it's in your blood stream.


I'm not sure it is the law, but it does shift the burden of presumption of impairment from the state to the defendant.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11470 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 8:14 pm to
Has anyone else heard that witnesses have come forward, stating he was smoking the devil's lettuce at the lake, earlier that day?

So let's go by what we know. The accident happened late afternoon, early evening. He was travelling on a busy road, with several intersections, at a high rate of speed (91 mph). He hit a stopped car, from the rear. THC has been found with the toxicology screening. The perpetrator claims he fell asleep.

I'm no Perry Mason, but those facts are pretty damning, and I'm sure the defense attorney is going to have his hands full preparing a defense with those known facts. I'm not sure where you even start.

Posted by ThaiTiger24
Member since Jan 2016
4119 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 8:37 pm to
He will plead. No way to go to trial with those facts unless you can attack the admissibility of the marijuana blood test.
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

Has anyone else heard that witnesses have come forward, stating he was smoking the devil's lettuce at the lake, earlier that day?


quote:

but those facts are pretty damning


I don't think you know what facts are.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11470 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:19 pm to
Your out of context, copy/paste just shows the depth your kind will descend to, in order to attempt to excuse the inexcusable actions.
This post was edited on 7/3/19 at 9:22 pm
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11470 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:25 pm to
I asked a question, then presented the facts, as we know them. Your deceptive tactic, attempted to combine the two. You are obviously a person of questionable intelligence.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11470 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

He will plead. No way to go to trial with those facts unless you can attack the admissibility of the marijuana blood test.


Agreed. I don't think F. Lee Bailey would want this in front of a jury.
Posted by allin2010
Auburn
Member since Aug 2011
18155 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 10:14 pm to
LINK

He has an attorney. He was not smoking that day
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11470 posts
Posted on 7/4/19 at 6:36 am to
quote:

He has an attorney. He was not smoking that day



Well if a criminal defense attorney says his client didn't do something, then it must be the truth.
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
12828 posts
Posted on 7/4/19 at 7:07 am to
quote:

He has an attorney. He was not smoking that day


Doing 90 in a 55. Can’t wait to see this defense. Will the attorney argue that the kid didn’t know how fast he was going or wasn’t aware of how fast he was going? I suppose you’d have to be high for that to occur . Or will the attorney argue that he did know how fast he was going and (insert some convoluted idea) the kid should be set free?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter