Started By
Message
re: Do A&M fans still feel like they got the better end of the deal with Chavis?
Posted on 9/7/17 at 11:05 am to BamaGradinTn
Posted on 9/7/17 at 11:05 am to BamaGradinTn
Again, you are missing the point. All Chavis has to do is field a "decent" defense if our offense wasn't crippled by a certifiable dumb shite as the HC. Chavis has always had a good defense. His problem at LSU was that their offense sucked.
Anyone that thinks our problems are Chavis isn't paying attention to what is happening at A&M.
Anyone that thinks our problems are Chavis isn't paying attention to what is happening at A&M.
5
Posted on 9/7/17 at 11:39 am to The Balinese Club
quote:
Anyone that thinks our problems are Chavis isn't paying attention to what is happening at A&M.
Well after firing Sumlin, y'all should make him HC for the next 6 years.
If at first you don't succeed try for 12 years of mediocrity!
Posted on 9/7/17 at 12:20 pm to The Balinese Club
quote:
All Chavis has to do is field a "decent" defense
All you needed was a top 50 D and it was gameover for everyone else. Thats what we were told
I cant wait till Aggie has to pay up for "stealing Chef"
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:20 pm to The Balinese Club
quote:
His problem at LSU was that their offense sucked.
The biggest problem was that the QBs sucked but Chavis' defenses were a sieve late in tight games. And that's with half the D going on to the NFL. His lack of recruiting eventually became a big problem as well.
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:41 pm to The Balinese Club
quote:
Again, you are missing the point. All Chavis has to do is field a "decent" defense if our offense wasn't crippled by a certifiable dumb shite as the HC. Chavis has always had a good defense. His problem at LSU was that their offense sucked. Anyone that thinks our problems are Chavis isn't paying attention to what is happening at A&M.
While I generally agree with this premise, Chavis did not scheme a logical defense with A&M having lost their starting QB and a 34 point lead at the half. The only way UCLA gets back in the game is through passing. Chavis should have double-covered key receivers and forced UCLA to run the ball and chew up clock. UCLA would have scored some TD's no doubt, since the A&M offense was completely inept in the 2nd half, but the Bruins would have probably run out of time having been forced to run the ball.
Posted on 9/8/17 at 4:56 am to The Balinese Club
quote:
Anyone that thinks our problems are Chavis isn't paying attention to what is happening at A&M.
Didn't his defense give up 5 straight touchdown drives?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News