Started By
Message

Frick 247 and Rivals
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:05 pm
Dawgs doing ESPN this year. That is all 

Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:10 pm to DawgRff
LOL, They are the worst and they will also update their ranking soon. You guys still have a good class though.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:16 pm to BIGJLAW
rivals still has Fromm ranked better then Tua, which makes no sense.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:18 pm to DawgRff
Rankings are cool and all for message board bragging rights, but at the end of the day a kid is the same player whether he gets ranked 50th or 500th by the websites
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:22 pm to narddogg81
Regardless of how you view ESPN's rankings, at least they don't update their rankings as much as the others. I don't get the reasoning of updating twice after the season is over. Once, yeah but twice? Well, I'm being biased 

Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:28 pm to DawgRff
While 247 does have it's own rating system, most use their composite as the gold standard. That composite takes into account 247, rivals, scout and espn and would therefore technically need to be updated anytime any website updates their ratings.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 1:49 pm to BIGJLAW
quote:
LOL, They are the worst and they will also update their ranking soon. You guys still have a good class though.
It's the worst but it's the most important for publicity because the signing day specials on ESPNU will show the ESPN rankings. Not 247 or Rivals or Scout.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 2:30 pm to narddogg81
quote:
rivals still has Fromm ranked better then Tua, which makes no sense.
I mean the coaches at the all star game thought the same thing so it's not a huge stretch.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 2:51 pm to chattabama
frick Luke Stampini. I'll complain about whatever I want to. IDGAF what UGA's record is. 

This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 1/17/17 at 3:04 pm to BIGJLAW
quote:
LOL, They are the worst and they will also update their ranking soon. You guys still have a good class though.
You guys had no problem touting them when they ranked your class high. The simple fact is all of the team rankings from all four services are incredibly similar, so I'm not sure there is an appreciable difference in any of them. There's no way to accurately rank thousands of high school players anyway, considering the many big times busts and the underrated recruits that become stars.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:26 pm to DawgRff
quote:
Regardless of how you view ESPN's rankings, at least they don't update their rankings as much as the others
Yeah, why change anything because of new information? Who does that shite?
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:59 pm to narddogg81
quote:Based on what?
rivals still has Fromm ranked better then Tua, which makes no sense.
Popular
Back to top
