Started By
Message
re: Lane Kiffin is out; Sark to call plays
Posted on 1/2/17 at 3:08 pm to Huddie Leadbetter
Posted on 1/2/17 at 3:08 pm to Huddie Leadbetter
Yeah you just said we wouldn't have been in the game.... which is basically saying the same damn thing.
The fact you insulted his intelligence after that stupid ban bet you lost makes you look even more foolish.
The fact you insulted his intelligence after that stupid ban bet you lost makes you look even more foolish.
Posted on 1/2/17 at 3:24 pm to Huddie Leadbetter
Didn't click.
Why are you still here? Didn't you just lose a ban bet to two members?
Why are you still here? Didn't you just lose a ban bet to two members?
Posted on 1/2/17 at 3:32 pm to YStar
Nowhere in that whole thread, or any thread, did I or have I ever said.... "Lane Kiffin was the only reason Bama was any good" You may not be intelligent enough to understand the difference, but I notice that you didn't take the bet. ...
Since neither of them had the balls to take the bet, I'll offer it to you. Find any post when I said "Lane Kiffin was the only reason Bama was any good" and I will quit. If you can not find that then you quit. Is it a bet?
Since neither of them had the balls to take the bet, I'll offer it to you. Find any post when I said "Lane Kiffin was the only reason Bama was any good" and I will quit. If you can not find that then you quit. Is it a bet?
Posted on 1/2/17 at 3:34 pm to Huddie Leadbetter
You guys take the internet toof seriously, get over it.
Posted on 1/2/17 at 3:36 pm to WW
I'm not the guy that keeps bringing up this silly shite, but I am the guy that wouldn't lose that bet.
Posted on 1/2/17 at 3:37 pm to Huddie Leadbetter
yall go get a private run. Damn
Posted on 1/2/17 at 3:38 pm to WW
Seriously.
And for the record, he never said Kiffin was the only reason, but said we couldn't have done it without him. Those statements don't mean the same thing.
I know this is tRant and there's a bunch of rednecks, but for fricks sake people this is simple reading comprehension. This is big reason I post on the Shag mainly and not one of my own teams boards. I don't expect everyone to be able to debate the meaning of the Heglian dialectic or anything but come the frick on.
Edited to add obligatory Internet, Srs Bznz
And for the record, he never said Kiffin was the only reason, but said we couldn't have done it without him. Those statements don't mean the same thing.
I know this is tRant and there's a bunch of rednecks, but for fricks sake people this is simple reading comprehension. This is big reason I post on the Shag mainly and not one of my own teams boards. I don't expect everyone to be able to debate the meaning of the Heglian dialectic or anything but come the frick on.
Edited to add obligatory Internet, Srs Bznz
This post was edited on 1/2/17 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 1/2/17 at 3:53 pm to doghouse_4x4
quote:
I know this is tRant and there's a bunch of rednecks, but for fricks sake people this is simple reading comprehension.
It's fricking frustrating sometimes.
Posted on 1/2/17 at 3:54 pm to Teague
quote:
It's fricking frustrating sometimes.
Plus 50
Posted on 1/2/17 at 5:39 pm to Huddie Leadbetter
You are the moron who keeps trying to ban bet people though.
Just ban yourself, since you're so desperate to see something banned.
Just ban yourself, since you're so desperate to see something banned.
Posted on 1/2/17 at 6:24 pm to Cobrasize
Put someone else in or make Kirven man up.
Posted on 1/2/17 at 6:29 pm to TideSaint
Just came to say Roll Tide to Lane Kiffin out after attempting to sabotage and undermine the hard work of this team.
Posted on 1/2/17 at 6:54 pm to Grievous Angel
Maybe more targets, maybe a bootleg or two to target OJ (vastly underutilized)
ArDarius actually throwing it down field some
I could name a bunch of wrinkles
ArDarius actually throwing it down field some
I could name a bunch of wrinkles
Posted on 1/2/17 at 7:06 pm to BuccWildBammer
quote:
I could name a bunch of wrinkles
Would love to see a booger flicker on the 1st play. Just to show Sark DGAF.
In all seriousness, It would be huge moving into next season with a great offensive showing in the title game.
Also will be a decent excuse if somehow we lost??
Posted on 1/3/17 at 5:10 am to doghouse_4x4
quote:
Heglian dialectic or anything
It's Hegelian. Just FYI!
Posted on 1/3/17 at 8:08 am to Othello
quote:
It's Hegelian. Just FYI!
Yeah, angry typing on my damn phone always leads to fun misspellings! Gotta love a typo when you are on a rant, lol.
Posted on 1/4/17 at 8:44 am to TideSaint
Thought this was interesting enough to add to this topic. From a particular UA email update I get each week:
The GOAT was facing a situation where he had an enormously talented but deeply flawed, undisciplined, and distracting OC whose poor behavior was escalating (hard to believe that was possible, but true) at the same time he was starting another job. His behavior would've meant he didn't play in the Peach Bowl if he were a player instead of being a coach. His inability to stick to the gameplan that had been agreed to during prep week infuriated Coach, as did his behavior. His lack of focus showed in #2's play. And it's not exactly a morale booster when players' girlfriends tell stories of your OC's exploits with their friends.
On the sideline, he had a hungry OC in waiting who had been with us since September and who has been breaking down Clemson for weeks. He knows our scheme, our personnel, our HC, and has been wildly successful on big stages. Contrary to rumors, he's been on a *strict* regimen since his arrival and hasn't had a hiccup. In addition to Sark being an obviously superior fit, the GOAT also believes he will be more productive than Kiffin over time.
And yet, we have fans who think this is somehow a negative. How?
To summarize, CNS isn't replacing a committed, disciplined, focused, talented OC with Sark to call the NCG in a week. He is replacing a talented OC whose talents currently are significantly diminished by both his professional and personal behavior. Given the current circumstances, UA fans should be thrilled that the GOAT has the Sam Cassell balls to make this call when he did, and put a plan in place months ago that even makes this sort of thing possible. Otherwise, we would be limping into the NCG with our offensive arm tied behind our back.
Outsiders wonder often if winning at Bama is boring. Maybe complacency has set in even among some of our fans. Well, if CNS and staff manage to get us to 15-0 in a rematch game with a TF QB, a week-old OC, and a historically great/productive defense, won't that be one of the greatest sports stories of all time? Isn't that exciting? Fun, even?
Personally, I'm excited and think that the events of the last week have created a beautiful dynamic for this team headed into next week. Let's get it on.
The GOAT was facing a situation where he had an enormously talented but deeply flawed, undisciplined, and distracting OC whose poor behavior was escalating (hard to believe that was possible, but true) at the same time he was starting another job. His behavior would've meant he didn't play in the Peach Bowl if he were a player instead of being a coach. His inability to stick to the gameplan that had been agreed to during prep week infuriated Coach, as did his behavior. His lack of focus showed in #2's play. And it's not exactly a morale booster when players' girlfriends tell stories of your OC's exploits with their friends.
On the sideline, he had a hungry OC in waiting who had been with us since September and who has been breaking down Clemson for weeks. He knows our scheme, our personnel, our HC, and has been wildly successful on big stages. Contrary to rumors, he's been on a *strict* regimen since his arrival and hasn't had a hiccup. In addition to Sark being an obviously superior fit, the GOAT also believes he will be more productive than Kiffin over time.
And yet, we have fans who think this is somehow a negative. How?
To summarize, CNS isn't replacing a committed, disciplined, focused, talented OC with Sark to call the NCG in a week. He is replacing a talented OC whose talents currently are significantly diminished by both his professional and personal behavior. Given the current circumstances, UA fans should be thrilled that the GOAT has the Sam Cassell balls to make this call when he did, and put a plan in place months ago that even makes this sort of thing possible. Otherwise, we would be limping into the NCG with our offensive arm tied behind our back.
Outsiders wonder often if winning at Bama is boring. Maybe complacency has set in even among some of our fans. Well, if CNS and staff manage to get us to 15-0 in a rematch game with a TF QB, a week-old OC, and a historically great/productive defense, won't that be one of the greatest sports stories of all time? Isn't that exciting? Fun, even?
Personally, I'm excited and think that the events of the last week have created a beautiful dynamic for this team headed into next week. Let's get it on.
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News