Started By
Message

Which of these upsets would be a bigger deal
Posted on 8/29/16 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 8/29/16 at 9:42 pm
USC over Alabama
Auburn over Clemson
Auburn over Clemson
Posted on 8/29/16 at 9:43 pm to AU24
Auburn over Clemson, in my opinion. USC is stacked but a bit of an unknown. Auburn sucks arse.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 9:43 pm to AU24
USC over Alabama. PAC 12 teams are notoriously soft in Central and Eastern timezone games.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 9:44 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
You passing the GED
I went to Hoover. Saban helped me out with the grades.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 9:45 pm to ukweli
Auburn over Clemson.
A little rough patch for a title team replacing their quarterback is to be expected, against a potentially quality opponent; a collapse of the Heisman favorite to absolute garbage is newsworthy.
A little rough patch for a title team replacing their quarterback is to be expected, against a potentially quality opponent; a collapse of the Heisman favorite to absolute garbage is newsworthy.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 9:45 pm to AU24
quote:
I went to Hoover. Saban helped me out with the grades.
Straight out of 2008.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 9:47 pm to AU24
Operation Reddog...weren't you?
Posted on 8/29/16 at 9:48 pm to AU24
Well the bigger deal would be USC over Bama. Bama is a bigger deal than Au. :
Posted on 8/29/16 at 9:49 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Operation Reddog...weren't you?
He put together the packets
Posted on 8/29/16 at 9:53 pm to AU24

Let's just pray they both happen
This post was edited on 8/29/16 at 9:54 pm
Posted on 8/29/16 at 9:55 pm to AU24
Auburn is likely not much less talented than Clemson, if at all. USC gets its share of talent, but is nowhere near Alabama's level. USC may even be middle-of-the-pack in the SEC, on talent.
And, not to hijack the thread or anything, but the way some of you are talking (likely trolling) A&M over UCLA would be the upset of the motherfricking century.
And, not to hijack the thread or anything, but the way some of you are talking (likely trolling) A&M over UCLA would be the upset of the motherfricking century.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 9:58 pm to KaiserSoze99
Auburn is not on Clemson's level in terms of talent. I don't care what the recruiting rankings say or don't say.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 10:07 pm to PharmacistReb
quote:
Auburn is not on Clemson's level in terms of talent. I don't care what the recruiting rankings say or don't say.
Well, if not recruiting rankings, what's your basis for comparing talent?
W's and L's doesn't work, or you have to believe fricking Baylor has more talent than LSU.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 10:08 pm to AU24
USC over the defending national champions
Posted on 8/29/16 at 10:09 pm to AU24
Either one would be huge.
USC over Bama would be the bigger deal. IMO
Don't think will happen, however.
USC over Bama would be the bigger deal. IMO
Don't think will happen, however.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 10:10 pm to AU24
Auburn over Clemson is more unlikely.
But to answer your question, it's always the biggest deal when Alabama loses.
But to answer your question, it's always the biggest deal when Alabama loses.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 10:24 pm to AU24
Bama will curb-stomp the Trojans so AU over CU.
Popular
Back to top
