Started By
Message
Alabama recruiting dominance, visualized
Posted on 6/24/16 at 9:45 am
Posted on 6/24/16 at 9:45 am
Posted on 6/24/16 at 9:47 am to skrayper
This post was edited on 6/24/16 at 9:51 am
Posted on 6/24/16 at 9:47 am to skrayper
Looks like the drawings of a three year old
Posted on 6/24/16 at 9:54 am to skrayper
All the top football schools have recruiting classes that vary slightly from year to year. Except Alabama. Nothing to see here.
Posted on 6/24/16 at 9:57 am to skrayper
Had no idea Saban was good at recruiting, thanks for sharing
Posted on 6/24/16 at 10:01 am to skrayper
Will never understand the obsession Alabama fans (and others to be fair) have with recruiting rankings.
As if Alabama needs such as evidence of their recent prowess. As if the "ratings" are not at least somewhat based on who has the most subs and who gets offered my x-coach.
There is a reason for the "Bama Bump." Those people at Rivals, scout, 24/7 are not actually qualified scouts. "Saban and Meyer offered this kid? He might be a bit better than we thought, let's bump him up the rankings a bit. Plus, it will help create conversation among our lemming subs."
Obviously, there is a correlation between top recruiting classes and future success, but it's just a correlation. At the INDIVIDUAL LEVEL, these "stars" don't matter a hill of beans.
Some future 1st Round pick signed with Central Florida, South Florida, or FAU back in Febraury...and went completely unnoticed by Miami, Florida, FSU, Alabama, LSU, Auburn, etc. While Alabama signed some 5-star that will not see the field. The coaches are not perfect themselves.
But again, do not understand the basis for 'Bama fans bragging about this shite.
Why not just post a graph of where we have finished in the season in the REAL Rankings? It's just as impressive and it actually matters.
As if Alabama needs such as evidence of their recent prowess. As if the "ratings" are not at least somewhat based on who has the most subs and who gets offered my x-coach.
There is a reason for the "Bama Bump." Those people at Rivals, scout, 24/7 are not actually qualified scouts. "Saban and Meyer offered this kid? He might be a bit better than we thought, let's bump him up the rankings a bit. Plus, it will help create conversation among our lemming subs."
Obviously, there is a correlation between top recruiting classes and future success, but it's just a correlation. At the INDIVIDUAL LEVEL, these "stars" don't matter a hill of beans.
Some future 1st Round pick signed with Central Florida, South Florida, or FAU back in Febraury...and went completely unnoticed by Miami, Florida, FSU, Alabama, LSU, Auburn, etc. While Alabama signed some 5-star that will not see the field. The coaches are not perfect themselves.
But again, do not understand the basis for 'Bama fans bragging about this shite.
Why not just post a graph of where we have finished in the season in the REAL Rankings? It's just as impressive and it actually matters.
Posted on 6/24/16 at 10:02 am to Tiger4life306
Would have no idea most of bama commits jump up in the rankings on the last update
Posted on 6/24/16 at 10:02 am to skrayper
This is why the argument that Saban ought not ever lose a game has some credence. During the dynasties/successful runs of the past (USC, Florida State, Miami etc.) those programs were bringing in Top 5 classes every year, but never has a program brought in the #1 most talented class every single year for close to a decade. That's why every time Bama drops a game, you hear folks criticize and ask how is that possible?
While its impossible to never lose a game, this graph really does beg the question why Saban can't ever seem to put together an undefeated season? Six straight seasons with at least one loss... averaging 1.7 losses per year. If Bama's talent gap is as massive as the graph you just posted, why is Bama losing nearly twice a year on average?
Bama has not taken the field one single time in six years in which the opponent has nearly as talented of a roster. Why the 10 losses?
This is not a criticism, its just in my opinion a legitimate question worth considering.
While its impossible to never lose a game, this graph really does beg the question why Saban can't ever seem to put together an undefeated season? Six straight seasons with at least one loss... averaging 1.7 losses per year. If Bama's talent gap is as massive as the graph you just posted, why is Bama losing nearly twice a year on average?
Bama has not taken the field one single time in six years in which the opponent has nearly as talented of a roster. Why the 10 losses?
This is not a criticism, its just in my opinion a legitimate question worth considering.
This post was edited on 6/24/16 at 10:07 am
Posted on 6/24/16 at 10:05 am to BHMKyle
quote:
This is why the argument that Saban ought not ever lose a game has some credence. During the dynasties/successful runs of the past (USC, Florida State, Miami etc.) those programs were bringing in Top 5 classes every year, but never has a program brought in the #1 most talented class every single year for close to a decade. That's why every time Bama drops a game, you hear folks criticize and ask how is that possible? While its impossible to never lose a game, this graph really does beg the question why Saban can't ever seem to put together an undefeated season? Six straight seasons with at least one loss... averaging 1.7 losses per year. If Bama's talent gap is as massive as the graph you just posted, why is Bama losing nearly twice a year on average? Bama has not taken the field one single time in six years in which the opponent has nearly as talented of a roster. Why the 10 losses? This is not a criticism, its just in my opinion and legitimate question worth considering.
Because the other teams are trying to win, too. That's why they actually play games not just look at who has the most talented roster.
And any person (Bama or not) who expects to never lose is a damn fool.
Posted on 6/24/16 at 10:05 am to BHMKyle
quote:
Bama has not taken the field one single time in six years in which the opponent has nearly as talented of a roster. Why the 10 losses?
2011 LSU was just as talented as 2011 Bama.
Posted on 6/24/16 at 10:09 am to Tom Haverford
quote:
Because the other teams are trying to win, too. That's why they actually play games not just look at who has the most talented roster.
So then was it coaching? How does an undoubtedly less talented team beat an opponent with far more talent? You seem to think its just their "will to win". Well then why has bama lacked this will to win on 10 separate occasions in just six years?
Posted on 6/24/16 at 10:10 am to Tom Haverford
Welcome to the SEC, Texas A&M. If you look at the 24/7 composite rankings list, if Texas A&M had stayed in the Big 12, they would be second over the last five years in recruiting. In the SEC? They're 6th, and 4th in the West.
It's a brutal place to try to win.
Another surprise - Oklahoma doesn't even show up on that list.
It's a brutal place to try to win.
Another surprise - Oklahoma doesn't even show up on that list.
Posted on 6/24/16 at 10:12 am to BHMKyle
quote:
This is why the argument that Saban ought not ever lose a game has some credence
quote:
How does an undoubtedly less talented team beat an opponent with far more talent?
Because it's sports you moron
This post was edited on 6/24/16 at 10:14 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News