Started By
Message
re: Top 10 SEC RB's Ever
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:37 pm to lsufball19
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:37 pm to lsufball19
Search your feelings. You know it to be true. And lol at Ohio State.
2
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:39 pm to TTsTowel
Yeah. Steve Van Buren, Harvey Williams, Jim Taylor and Billy Cannon just missed the cut. So I limited it to guys on the top 10 SEC career rushing list. 
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:43 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Search your feelings. You know it to be true. And lol at Ohio State.
Your Gumpness was in question earlier in the thread. You've redeemed yourself over the last couple of pages though.
Congrats.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:44 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Search your feelings. You know it to be true. And lol at Ohio State.
Why would I search my feelings? You need to just search your brain. If Ole Miss wins the west and the SEC, they have a better chance of making the playoffs than Alabama, end of story. I'm actually very happy that didn't happen for my own personal reasons pertaining to Ole Miss. That doesn't mean Alabama wasn't the best team last year, they proved they were. That just means they would have been l;eft out for failure to win their conference.
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:45 pm to RB10
quote:Alabama was #2 in the AP the last week of the season. Even if Ole Miss wins the SEC, Bama is still easily top 4. OSU was #7.
1 loss tOSU would go before Bama, if neither wins their conference in 2015.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:46 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Alabama was #2 in the AP the last week of the season. Even if Ole Miss wins the SEC, Bama is still easily top 4. OSU was #7.
Georgia probably thought the same thing in 2007
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:46 pm to JuiceTerry
Lol @ Emmitt Smith being that low in a top SEC RBs list...
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:46 pm to lsufball19
But they wouldn't have been left out. Thank God it didn't go down like that, because we'd still be hearing the crying.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:47 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
But they wouldn't have been left out.
You saying this over and over doesn't make it true
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:47 pm to Lsupimp
After next year, 4 of the top 8 all-time SEC Rushing leaders will be LSU (LF, Faulk, Alexander, Hilliard). Need some Mount Rushmore gifs of that. 
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:47 pm to lsufball19
quote:
as a college player? yes, Tebow shits all over Jay Cutler. Tim Tebow is arguably one of the best college players of all-time
My point was that trying to point to a player's awards and saying it is a reflection on talent is foolish. If you put Tebow on Vandy and Cutler on Florida, who do you think is most likely to win a Heisman?
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:47 pm to lsufball19
Georgia would have been in a 4 team playoff in 2007. 
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:48 pm to JuiceTerry
Because that ranking wouldn't have changed when Bama wasn't in the SEC title game, right?
Gumpin at easy baw.
Gumpin at easy baw.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:48 pm to lsufball19
Just being true makes it true. I don't have to say anything.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:50 pm to RB10
So 2 falls behind 7 when they're in the same boat? corndawgin it strong.
corndawgin it strong. Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:50 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Just being true makes it true.
prove it
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:51 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
So 2 falls behind 7 when they're in the same boat?
What don't you understand about the fact that Bama wouldn't have been #2 if they weren't playing in the SECCG?
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:52 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
So 2 falls behind 7 when they're in the same boat? corndawgin it strong.
UGA was jumped by the #7 team in the country simply by not playing in the SECCG in 2007. Yes, that happened
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:52 pm to RB10
So they're 8? With the same record? Get a grip dude.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:54 pm to RB10
Loss at home to undefeated Big 10 champ and playoff bound MSU > Loss at home to 2-loss SEC champ, or runner up, OM.
Also, defending national champs > Not defending national champs.
Don't let that get in the way of your argument that Bama would be in because "Bama" though.
ETA: MSU had one loss. The point still stands though.
Also, defending national champs > Not defending national champs.
Don't let that get in the way of your argument that Bama would be in because "Bama" though.
ETA: MSU had one loss. The point still stands though.
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 1:55 pm
Page 12 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News