Started By
Message
If the bowls were restructured, Florida vs N'Western
Posted on 1/1/16 at 5:48 pm
Posted on 1/1/16 at 5:48 pm
Tennessee vs Michigan, Michigan State vs Clemson, Okie vs Alabama, Iowa vs Notre Dame, Ohio State vs Stanford. Tell me that these wouldn't have been more competitive. These bowls all suck man. 
7
Posted on 1/1/16 at 5:50 pm to Taurus 357
Would have been much better match ups, but it's not our fault Florida cheated for their first 6 games
Posted on 1/1/16 at 5:51 pm to Taurus 357
Yeah it was a bit of a whiff this year.
Posted on 1/1/16 at 5:53 pm to Taurus 357
You were so wrong all week about VOLS vs Northwestern
Posted on 1/1/16 at 5:53 pm to Taurus 357
Man, your prediction for the UT-Northwestern game was spot on! You seem to have a real high football acumen!
Posted on 1/1/16 at 5:58 pm to Taurus 357
quote:
Tennessee vs Michigan, Michigan State vs Clemson, Okie vs Alabama, Iowa vs Notre Dame, Ohio State vs Stanford.
Eh, Clemson and Alabama would both have won easily. Iowa vs ND would have been a bore fest.
OSU vs Stanford should have been part of the playoff.
Posted on 1/1/16 at 6:22 pm to Taurus 357
The funny thing about this argument is that Tennessee wouldn't even have played in a big bowl game, if they structured them better.
Posted on 1/1/16 at 6:30 pm to Taurus 357
Tennessee would have played Michigan if they could finish a game against Florida.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News