Started By
Message
re: 2016 Football Staff Hires/Rumors
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:30 pm to rawDAWG333
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:30 pm to rawDAWG333
I can't say...idk who yet but I know it's not them.
This post was edited on 1/3/16 at 8:31 pm
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:34 pm to history88
None of us know anything about who is getting hired
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:37 pm to history88
quote:
Ok...
You don't know your arse from a hole in the ground
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:58 pm to Mike Gordon
Hahaha @Mike, you slay me!
I said idk who is getting the job but I know who isn't.
I said idk who is getting the job but I know who isn't.
This post was edited on 1/3/16 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 1/3/16 at 9:11 pm to history88
I would venture that the Recruiting dude from Washington might hint to Lupoi, since they have history, but that is nothing more than wild-arse speculation.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 9:18 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Recruiting dude from Washington
They were not there at the same time. Connection was he worked at Bama. Most are wishing for Tosh, but Tucker seems more likely.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 9:25 pm to AmericusDawg
I would bet neither will happen.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 9:30 pm to AmericusDawg
Y'all keep throwing out their names and I'm telling you that neither are right yet you ignore it.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 9:36 pm to history88
Is this all about you saying that CNS has forbidden CKS from hiring "on-field" coaches? CKS is a big boy and can make the hires he wants, plus how do we know Mel Tucker will even be retained as both Pruitt and Saban specialize in coaching DBs and that's Tucker's position group.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 9:41 pm to history88
quote:
Y'all keep throwing out their names and I'm telling you that neither are right yet you ignore it.
People keep throwing out their names because they make the most sense.
The entire defensive staff has been named except for the DC. It would stand to reason that the DC has been hired but hasn't been named due to some other obligation. That leaves Bama, Clemson, and the NFL. Kirby has limited contacts in the NFL, so that doesn't seem likely. Clemson isn't a scheme fit. So that leaves Bama, which would mean either Lupoi or Tucker.
That's why people keep throwing their names out.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 9:43 pm to Crowknowsbest
Okay, well it made sense to keep BMac and Pruitt as they were great recruiters and CJP finally got our defense headed in the right direction but neither of those worked out...so there goes that logic.
But that's fine, I'm done with the rant and when he hires his DC you'll see I was right.
But that's fine, I'm done with the rant and when he hires his DC you'll see I was right.
This post was edited on 1/3/16 at 9:45 pm
Posted on 1/3/16 at 9:46 pm to history88
quote:
it made sense to keep BMac and Pruitt
except it didn't, because new coaches pretty much always want their own staff.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 9:47 pm to history88
quote:
Not true at all.
how is that not true?
Posted on 1/3/16 at 9:49 pm to Crowknowsbest
Do you watch football at all? Like anything other than middle school or high school.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 9:50 pm to history88
Yes. Name me a situation where a new coach kept a large portion of a fired coach's staff.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News