Started By
Message
What do members of the "Little 8" really think of the...
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:38 am
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:38 am
"Big 6" and the monopoly that we have had for the past 120 years over this conference?
It is quite impressive. And, I don't really see anyone who can threaten any of these members in the forseeable future.
It is quite impressive. And, I don't really see anyone who can threaten any of these members in the forseeable future.
23
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:40 am to Mister Tee
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:40 am to Mister Tee
terrible. Have a downvote.
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:40 am to Mister Tee
quote:
Mister Tee
Your contributions have solidified the big 6. STFU
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:41 am to Mister Tee
they jelly as hell.
Of course not. The day that a non-6 does win an SECC, it's not like we have to go back to the drawing board and rethink things. Those 6 are what they are based on decades upon decades of success. They are by far the top 6 teams historically in the conference.
And I mean, the non-6ers that have won an SEC title, they last came in 1963 and 1941.
quote:
I don't really see anyone who can threaten any of these members in the forseeable future
Of course not. The day that a non-6 does win an SECC, it's not like we have to go back to the drawing board and rethink things. Those 6 are what they are based on decades upon decades of success. They are by far the top 6 teams historically in the conference.
And I mean, the non-6ers that have won an SEC title, they last came in 1963 and 1941.
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:42 am to Mister Tee
Good heavens what a truly original bit of trolling. You must have lain awake, tossing and turning, for days on end to come up with a subject that no one, no one at all, has ever mentioned on this board.
This gets a D-. I'd give you an F but there was some vague intent there.
This gets a D-. I'd give you an F but there was some vague intent there.
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:43 am to Mister Tee
I'm not really worried about the last 120 tears.. maybe the last 3? 
We have racked up 4 national titles (3 claimed, 1 unclaimed), 18 conference titles, 22 unanaimous all americans, and 2 Heisman winners.
We have racked up 4 national titles (3 claimed, 1 unclaimed), 18 conference titles, 22 unanaimous all americans, and 2 Heisman winners.
This post was edited on 5/14/15 at 9:51 am
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:43 am to Bluefin
Why so much animosity?
The truth is the truth.
The truth is the truth.
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:43 am to Mister Tee
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:45 am to Farmer1906
quote:
We have made up 3 national titels (2 claimed, 1 unclaimed)
FIFY
This post was edited on 5/14/15 at 9:47 am
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:45 am to Mister Tee
quote:
"Big 6" and the monopoly that we have had for the past 120 years over this conference?
Lol, Florida didn't even join the club until the 90's.
[spookyvoice]BUT NOTHING WILL EVER CHANGE![/spookyvoice]
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:46 am to RB10
We do have an AP national title and 2 Heismans. Undebatable.
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:48 am to cardboardboxer
Florida deserves it though. What they did in the 90's was freakin impressive.
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:48 am to cardboardboxer
My calculations show that another nine years of offseason excellence will move Arkansas ahead of Tulane on the Big VI waiting list.
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:49 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
We do have an AP national title and 2 Heismans. Undebatable.
Fixed. I meant to include only the national "titel" portion of his post.
He's also claiming 18 conference titles, 22 All-Americans and 2 Heisman winners in 3 years, but that's not even worth addressing.
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:49 am to Mister Tee
quote:
"Big 6" and the monopoly that we have had for the past 120 years over this conference?
What sport do you play?
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:51 am to RB10
quote:
He's also claiming 18 conference titles, 22 All-Americans and 2 Heisman winners in 3 years, but that's not even worth addressing.
No one is this stupid. You're better than that.
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:51 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
Lol, Florida didn't even join the club until the 90's.
the "big 6" was officially formed in 92 when the league went to 12 teams. Non-6ers at that time were kentucky, vandy, sc, om, msu, and arkansas. Are you denying that UF should have been there at the time?
And what they've done from 92-15 makes up for lost time. No team is going to enter the big 6 (or force the creation of a "big 8" anytime soon. It would take multiple decades worth of high level success.
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:51 am to shinerfan
quote:
My calculations show that another nine years of offseason excellence will move Arkansas ahead of Tulane on the Big VI waiting list.
If only we got to play LSU a few more times each season we'd get there for sure.
Posted on 5/14/15 at 9:53 am to Mister Tee
quote:
Florida deserves it though. What they did in the 90's was freakin impressive.
I agree.
quote:
Are you denying that UF should have been there at the time?
In 92? frick ya. Now you are just making up the rules as you go.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News