Started By
Message

re: Who would the SEC replace Missouri with?

Posted on 4/20/15 at 1:47 pm to
Posted by nebraskafaninwi
Member since Mar 2013
2655 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 1:47 pm to
No grants of rights for SEC schools. Thus, the easiest schools to move to a new conference.
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
5921 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

No grants of rights for SEC schools. Thus, the easiest schools to move to a new conference.



This is accurate. The SEC schools have the least barriers to moving to another conference among the P5.

But there's a damn good reason no one has left yet, through all this expansion. No one is holding a gun to anyone's head in this conference. Those of us who have been in other conferences understand and appreciate the weight of that.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
55191 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

nebraskafaninwi


quote:

No grants of rights for SEC schools. Thus, the easiest schools to move to a new conference.


Either this is a heavy troll or you do not follow the SEC much. The exit fee is 0 as nobody wants to leave. You are viewing this backwards as those with the highest exit fees must do that to stop folks from leaving. The last 2 schools to leave the SEC did so about a half century ago and became poster children of why leaving is not a good idea.

Mizzou is in and folks in the B1G need to accept it and move on.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30306 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

No grants of rights for SEC schools. Thus, the easiest schools to move to a new conference.
No team wants to leave the SEC dude.
Posted by Sevendust912
Member since Jun 2013
11367 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 2:49 pm to
WVU

please take us
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter