Started By
Message
2015 SEC football teams ranked by CBS NFL draft
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:58 pm
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:58 pm
This link was previously posted and I used it to rank the teams by talent for 2015.
Spent more time than it was worth. Totally objective scoring system was used. Based on best 11 for each offense and defense. Surplus talent did not play a role.
Incoming freshman, JUCO, etc. were not included
Payed no attention to whether a player was injured or not. Assumed player with the best score is a starter even if he is not projected to be a starter.
Offense:
QB, RB, WR, WR, WR, TE, OT, OT, OG, OG, C
Defense:
4-3
DT, DT, DE, DE, MLB, OLB, OLB, CB, CB, SS, FS
3-4 (Alabama, Georgia, Vanderbilt)
DT, DE, DE, OLB, OLB, ILB, ILB, CB, CB, SS, FS
CBS' MOST TALENTED OFFENSES
1. LSU (18.3)
2. Texas A&M (16.6)
3. Tennessee (16.4)
4. Ole Miss (14.2)
5. Auburn (14.0)
6. Alabama (13.8)
7. Georgia (13.3)
8. Carolina (12.1)
9. Miss St (10.7)
10. Arkansas (10.4)
11. Kentucky (9.5)
12. Florida (8.2)
13. Vanderbilt (7.5)
14. Missouri (7.3)
CBS' MOST TALENTED DEFENSES
1. Alabama 18.1
2. Georgia 14.4
3. Auburn 14.2
4. LSU 14.0
5. Florida 13.5
6. Carolina 12.7
7. Miss State 11.8
8. Ole Miss 11.7
9. Tennessee 11.3
10. Texas A&M 9.8
11. Arkansas 9.5
12. Vanderbilt 8.4
13. Kentucky 7.2
14. Missouri 6.7
Spent more time than it was worth. Totally objective scoring system was used. Based on best 11 for each offense and defense. Surplus talent did not play a role.
Incoming freshman, JUCO, etc. were not included
Payed no attention to whether a player was injured or not. Assumed player with the best score is a starter even if he is not projected to be a starter.
Offense:
QB, RB, WR, WR, WR, TE, OT, OT, OG, OG, C
Defense:
4-3
DT, DT, DE, DE, MLB, OLB, OLB, CB, CB, SS, FS
3-4 (Alabama, Georgia, Vanderbilt)
DT, DE, DE, OLB, OLB, ILB, ILB, CB, CB, SS, FS
CBS' MOST TALENTED OFFENSES
1. LSU (18.3)
2. Texas A&M (16.6)
3. Tennessee (16.4)
4. Ole Miss (14.2)
5. Auburn (14.0)
6. Alabama (13.8)
7. Georgia (13.3)
8. Carolina (12.1)
9. Miss St (10.7)
10. Arkansas (10.4)
11. Kentucky (9.5)
12. Florida (8.2)
13. Vanderbilt (7.5)
14. Missouri (7.3)
CBS' MOST TALENTED DEFENSES
1. Alabama 18.1
2. Georgia 14.4
3. Auburn 14.2
4. LSU 14.0
5. Florida 13.5
6. Carolina 12.7
7. Miss State 11.8
8. Ole Miss 11.7
9. Tennessee 11.3
10. Texas A&M 9.8
11. Arkansas 9.5
12. Vanderbilt 8.4
13. Kentucky 7.2
14. Missouri 6.7
16
Posted on 2/10/15 at 11:02 pm to BornKjun
Mizzou looking good
Posted on 2/10/15 at 11:30 pm to BornKjun
As an LSU fan all this does is make me think we have underachieved, why post this?
Posted on 2/10/15 at 11:30 pm to BornKjun
quote:
CBS' MOST TALENTED OFFENSES
1. LSU (18.3)
Posted on 2/11/15 at 12:12 am to BornKjun
Of course.
Mizzou is undoubtedly the most disrespected and overlooked program in the history of college football.
Posted on 2/11/15 at 1:08 am to BornKjun
I'm adding Brantley being ranked 21st to my Mizzou disrespect.txt file. He's better right now than Nk, Ashawn, and Chris Jones. Barring serious injury, he'll leave early for the 2016 draft and be taken early.
This post was edited on 2/11/15 at 1:09 am
Posted on 2/11/15 at 6:36 am to BornKjun
Damn shame
Posted on 2/11/15 at 6:36 am to BornKjun
Sleeveless tee-shirts ordered, awaiting printing. Number 11!
Posted on 2/11/15 at 7:57 am to BornKjun
quote:
CBS' MOST TALENTED OFFENSES
quote:
1. LSU (18.3)
Posted on 2/11/15 at 8:51 am to BornKjun
quote:
CBS' MOST TALENTED OFFENSES
1. LSU (18.3)
The shirts
Print them
Posted on 2/11/15 at 9:06 am to BornKjun
Is there any chance of finding this same analysis from prior years measured against the actual results from those years?
Anyone can rank a bunch of stats. But what are the rankings worth?
Anyone can rank a bunch of stats. But what are the rankings worth?
Posted on 2/11/15 at 9:10 am to BornKjun
Looks like that bama/UGA game is gonna be a 13-10 slugfest based on this.
Posted on 2/11/15 at 9:54 am to BornKjun
Can you post a breakdown of how you calculated the scores? Would be helpful to actually know what I'm looking at.
An NFL projection probably isn't a great way to rank college performance but still interesting. I think you would get a more accurate result if we were to take it and weight certain positions more heavily, and even weigh the most talented players more heavily. College is much more about utilizing your best guys than the NFL, especially skill positions.
An NFL projection probably isn't a great way to rank college performance but still interesting. I think you would get a more accurate result if we were to take it and weight certain positions more heavily, and even weigh the most talented players more heavily. College is much more about utilizing your best guys than the NFL, especially skill positions.
This post was edited on 2/11/15 at 9:58 am
Posted on 2/11/15 at 10:35 am to BornKjun
thank you for admitting the system was biased 
Posted on 2/11/15 at 10:36 am to BornKjun
So, what excuse will LSU use this year then?
Posted on 2/11/15 at 10:44 am to BornKjun
quote:This is what makes winning even more fun.
14. Missouri (7.3)
This post was edited on 2/11/15 at 10:47 am
Posted on 2/11/15 at 10:46 am to BornKjun
These lists are more of an indictment of coaching......
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News