we absolutely did. Auburn (MAYBE) was the only team we played that could match up with us 22 for 22 with talent. We didn't lose any of our 3 games due to not being talented enough.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by Crowknowsbest

Member since May 2012

25901 posts

Posted on 12/29/14 at 10:28 am to WG_Dawg

quote:
we absolutely did. Auburn (MAYBE) was the only team we played that could match up with us 22 for 22 with talent. We didn't lose any of our 3 games due to not being talented enough.

Not what I mean. UGA needs to be talented enough to win even when they don't have their A game against inferior teams that are focused. Right now, UGA isn't at that level. Alabama and FSU are, which is why they're consistently competing for titles.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by UGAalum08

Greenville, SC

Member since Aug 2014

944 posts

Posted on 12/29/14 at 10:30 am to WG_Dawg

I think the key to Crow's comment may have been "to get by". Unlike some recent years, we didn't have enough talent this year to win games half asleep. We could have "gotten by" those games in the Stafford or Murray years.

Or maybe that's not what he meant, but hey, that's what I think.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by bulldawger

Fish Creek, GA

Member since Jul 2010

2885 posts

Posted on 12/29/14 at 10:42 am to WG_Dawg

Say what you will, but at this time, in regards to support and facilities, it just doesn't seem like Alabama, Auburn, LSU, and T A&M are our competition.

We are competing with SC, Mizz, Ole Miss, Vandy, and Ky.

A little embarrassing and sobering.

1 ...

Report Post

Georgia Sports Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board