Started By
Message

re: The Loss to Tech

Posted on 12/2/14 at 11:24 am to
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14313 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Twice we had the ball on the 1 yard and fumbled it away. Had that not happened, we would not have had to squib at the end


Your logic sucks. We did not have to squib at the end. But we did...and it cost us the game.

quote:

those fumbles cost us the game


We were winning after those two fumbles with 18 secs left. Therefore, they did not cost us the game. Giving up 3 points at the end cost us the game....which happened because of The Squib Kick.
Posted by UGAalum08
Greenville, SC
Member since Aug 2014
944 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 11:25 am to
I'm baiting, shh.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

We did not have to squib at the end. But we did...and it cost us the game.


Squatchdawg, I'm through trying to explain it to a fool.

However, I'd like to make a final point by asking these questions.

In the history of high school, college and pro football. how many games were lost after a team was winning with only 18 seconds left in the game?

In those games where a team was winning with only 18 seconds left but ended up losing, how many of those games were lost after the kicker kicked the ball out of the endzone, deep into the endzone or just outside of the endzone?
This post was edited on 12/2/14 at 2:35 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter