Started By
Message
Missouri - one SEC win vs. team with winning conference record
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:19 am
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:19 am
For all of the talk about Missouri being 14-2 over the past two years in the SEC, they have beaten only ONE team with a winning record in the conference and that was last year. Looks like Pinkel is making a name by beating a bunch of bad east teams.
2013:
Vanderbilt 4-4
Georgia 5-3
Florida 3-5
Tennessee 2-6
Kentucky 0-8
Ole Miss 3-5
Texas A&M 4-4
2014:
South Carolina 3-5
Florida 4-4
Vanderbilt 0-8
Kentucky 2-6
Texas A&M 3-5
Tennessee 3-5
Arkansas 2-6
They lost to South Carolina and Auburn in 2013 and Georgia this year.
Looks like any time they play a decent SEC team they lose. Bama wins this weekend by 21.
Oh and Indiana.
2013:
Vanderbilt 4-4
Georgia 5-3
Florida 3-5
Tennessee 2-6
Kentucky 0-8
Ole Miss 3-5
Texas A&M 4-4
2014:
South Carolina 3-5
Florida 4-4
Vanderbilt 0-8
Kentucky 2-6
Texas A&M 3-5
Tennessee 3-5
Arkansas 2-6
They lost to South Carolina and Auburn in 2013 and Georgia this year.
Looks like any time they play a decent SEC team they lose. Bama wins this weekend by 21.
Oh and Indiana.
9
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:20 am to GIbson05
SEC East sucks.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:22 am to GIbson05
Alabama 1 win vs a team with a winning conference record this year.. 1 win vs a team with a winning conference record last year as well..
coincidence??
coincidence??
This post was edited on 12/1/14 at 9:23 am
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:25 am to GIbson05
Que Spurrier bitching about schedules.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:34 am to Koch Snowflake
quote:
Alabama 1 win vs a team with a winning conference record this year.. 1 win vs a team with a winning conference record last year as well..
coincidence??
This is only a knock if it is against Mizzou. For Alabama it goes to show you the parity of the SEC West.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:35 am to GIbson05
Alabama only has two in the same time frame.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:36 am to JesusQuintana
This is such a stupid argument. If we hadn't gone 14-2 in this time span then a lot more of the teams would be above .500. Someone has to lose the game you dunces
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:39 am to FightTigers
quote:
If we hadn't gone 14-2 in this time span then a lot more of the teams would be above .500. Someone has to lose the game you dunces
Math and shite
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:39 am to FightTigers
Look when they brought in MU the Avg ATC score went up dramatically. DOnt expect any logic.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:39 am to FightTigers
In fact, to find a division champ with more than 2 such wins you have to go all the way back to 2010.
Dumb argument is dumb.
Dumb argument is dumb.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:41 am to Mizzourah2006
quote:
This is only a knock if it is against Mizzou. For Alabama it goes to show you the parity of the SEC West.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:44 am to GIbson05
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:46 am to Mizz-SEC
Alabama - one win vs SEC teams with winning conference records each of the last two seasons:
2014 - 5-3 Mississippi State
2013 - 5-3 LSU
So impressive.
2014 - 5-3 Mississippi State
2013 - 5-3 LSU
So impressive.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:52 am to Sarcastro
I think the Mizzou fans facts about Bama's record made the OP go into hiding. When I saw the title, I was thinking since Auburn and LSU finished 4-4 that Bama probably didn't have many more than that. The fact is that in any given year there will most likely be no more than 3 teams per division with winning conference records, and if one of those teams is the team in question, then only two potential wins available anyway.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:54 am to GIbson05
Like I've said before, go tigers.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:59 am to Tigerpaul1969
quote:
I think the Mizzou fans facts about Bama's record made the OP go into hiding. When I saw the title, I was thinking since Auburn and LSU finished 4-4 that Bama probably didn't have many more than that. The fact is that in any given year there will most likely be no more than 3 teams per division with winning conference records, and if one of those teams is the team in question, then only two potential wins available anyway.
Yes it's stupid. Now for all the Mizzou fans getting their panties in too big a bunch I will say MSU, Auburn, LSU, West Virginia are better wins than South Carolina, Kentucky, Vanderbilt, and UCF (we both played A&M, Arkansas, Tennessee, & Florida). How the hell they lost to Ole Miss is beyond me but maybe that is just one of those teams like A&M whose number we have for some reason.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 10:05 am to GIbson05
Great original subject matter.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 10:11 am to GIbson05
They lost to South Carolina and Auburn in 2013 - couldn't have - you listed 7 teams they beat
Posted on 12/1/14 at 10:12 am to GIbson05
The SEC West has won 5 SEC title games in a row and has produced 4 national champions and 6 national champion game participants over that span.
But ya, keep telling yourself the East is just as good at the moment.
But ya, keep telling yourself the East is just as good at the moment.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 12:07 pm to IAmReality
Who said that?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News