Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

A rule change I think we can all agree upon

Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:00 am
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:00 am
The NCAA Football Rules Committee proposed an alteration involving the instant-replay review on targeting fouls during its Feb. 11-12 meeting in Indianapolis, which includes the ejection of the player committing the foul along with a 15-yard penalty.

Last season, the targeting rule was implemented and any player committing the penalty would be ejected and his team assessed a 15-yard penalty.

The committee recommended that if the instant replay official rules that a disqualification should not have occurred, and if the targeting foul is not accompanied by another personal foul, the 15-yard penalty for targeting should not be enforced.
However, if the targeting foul is committed in conjunction with another personal foul, the 15-yard penalty for that personal foul remains. For example, if a player is called for roughing the passer and targeting the head and neck area, but the instant replay official rules that targeting did not occur, the player flagged would remain in the game, but the roughing the passer penalty would still be enforced.

All rules proposals must be approved by the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel, which will discuss the football rules changes March 6. The proposed changes are being circulated for membership comment.

“Overall, the targeting rule was successful and has had the intended impact of making play safer,” said Troy Calhoun, head coach at the Air Force Academy and chair of the committee, which met Monday through Thursday in Indianapolis. “This alteration keeps the intent of the rule, but allows replay to correct all of the consequences from a rare missed call.”

In games where instant replay is not in use, the committee recommended an option to permit on-field officials to review targeting calls during halftime that were made during the first half. This is a permissive rule by conference policy or mutual consent of the teams and is the responsibility of the home team to provide the parameters for the use of video. The review must be conducted by the referee in the officials’ locker room.

Officials could then reverse the targeting call and allow the player to compete in the second half. The committee noted that many Football Championship Subdivision, Division II and Division III games are not played using instant replay so this modification gives those teams greater flexibility to review targeting fouls during a game.

LINK
Posted by naturu
Member since Feb 2014
13 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:04 am to
thats a lot to read. All I read was the part in bold but yea i guess that makes sense
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25886 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:08 am to
Thank goodness. That shite cost us a game last season
Posted by FourThreeForty
Member since May 2013
17290 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:08 am to
I read all of it. All of these rules I just think are unnecessary. These people that are sueing the NCAA should be dealing with it. They signed up for football and played it professionally and collegiately. They're the reason that we have people like Mark E. And Roger G. Who want 25225689 rules just to save their arse from getting fired. And then look like heroes when nothing happens for a while.
Posted by Projectpat
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
10522 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:37 am to
Saban finally gets something right.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:37 am to
Upvoted.
Posted by Aman
Alabama
Member since Mar 2010
5181 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:42 am to
I think we should all be able to agree that defenses shouldn't be at the mercy of the offense to determine when they can substitute.
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:45 am to
quote:

I think we should all be able to agree that defenses shouldn't be at the mercy of the offense to determine when they can substitute.


Agreed...thank god for timeouts.
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:46 am to
Clearly no one agrees about the proposed rule you're referring to. I am curious as to why you had to stir that shite in this tread and couldn't just stick to the topic?

Good on them for realizing the obvious faults of the targeting rule.
Posted by Projectpat
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
10522 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:48 am to
I also agree that turkey sandwiches are superior to ham sandwiches.
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
32802 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:57 am to
quote:

The committee recommended that if the instant replay official rules that a disqualification should not have occurred, and if the targeting foul is not accompanied by another personal foul, the 15-yard penalty for targeting should not be enforced.


Way too logical of a proposal to pass through the Rules Committee
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 11:05 am to
Saban has been advocating for this rule change all season. Must be an evil conspiracy to help hard hitting secondaries.
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Every coach has been advocating for this rule change all season.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43890 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 11:10 am to
quote:

I think we should all be able to agree that defenses shouldn't be at the mercy of the offense to determine when they can substitute.


Actually, I think most people here would agree that this is stupid. Defenses can sub whenever they want, they just have to be quick about it if a team is in HUNH. Too often a team gets flagged because the guy being subbed out is hardly jogging to get off the field. Have your team man up and sprint off the field if you want to sub when an offense is going up tempo.

This coming from a fan of a team that hardly ever runs HUNH.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter