Started By
Message
Posted on 10/3/13 at 8:54 am to UMRealist
Yes, your true freshman being forced to play because of depth issues is an indictment against our true freshman QB.
That logic was literally used in this thread.
That logic was literally used in this thread.
Posted on 10/3/13 at 9:21 am to Quicksilver
Not that anyone really cares, but their third string quarterback (who Merlins flipped from USM) is better because OM hasn't played a third string quarterback.
DWI
DWI
This post was edited on 10/3/13 at 9:22 am
Posted on 10/3/13 at 9:41 am to UMRealist
quote:
they complete each other.
:Rivalry:
Posted on 10/7/13 at 11:51 am to Whereisomaha
quote:
He is. Stats prove that
Once again.
WiO would nevAr say anything homerish!!1!1
quote:
Endowment growth corresponded to your enrollment growth. A lot of the things you're saying I said are things you aren't proving I'm wrong
So you are still supporting that ridiculous position? Great!
Gotta love when more current students endow more of their millions to a university.
quote:
When did I say destroy? If that were the case Id ban bet you that we would win instead of just a sig bet. If I'm a homer for thinking we win then so is Las Vegas
Welp, I'd say we established a few things here.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 12:21 pm to engie
I made the original statement that Barry is the better runner because he's just as stocky but faster and quicker, which anyone with eyes can see that. Then said his stats back it up if you don't believe that. Since we've played Bama and AU, his stats no longer reflect that. If that's how you want to justify who is a better runner then whatever makes you happy. I know after we play Idaho and Troy and Barry gets in for mop up duty I won't be bumping this thread just because his YPC all of a sudden is higher than Daks and that all of sudden makes him a better runner.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 12:46 pm to Whereisomaha
Fact
Dak has 100+ rushing yds vs BOTH LSU and Auburn, not sure how you can argue that WIO when comparing Dak with Brunetti.
Dak has 100+ rushing yds vs BOTH LSU and Auburn, not sure how you can argue that WIO when comparing Dak with Brunetti.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 1:13 pm to Whereisomaha
You won't be bumping it because it isn't even close to factual. And it won't be then either. You know it. I know it. The whole SEC knows it.
Nevermind that the vast majority of Dak's rushing stats came against LSU and Auburn. Not in mop up duty against shite teams.
Nevermind that the vast majority of Dak's rushing stats came against LSU and Auburn. Not in mop up duty against shite teams.
This post was edited on 10/7/13 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 10/7/13 at 3:16 pm to engie
easy to get rushing yards when you're down by 30 and and all LSU is doing is sitting their DBs 15-20 yards downfield.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 3:24 pm to pankReb
quote:
easy to get rushing yards when you're down by 30 and and all LSU is doing is sitting their DBs 15-20 yards downfield.
You sir...clearly didn't watch any second of the game.
we didn't get down until the 4th quarter...and Dak's yardage was early.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 3:53 pm to pankReb
quote:
easy to get rushing yards when you're down by 30 and and all LSU is doing is sitting their DBs 15-20 yards downfield.
haha
Posted on 10/7/13 at 6:44 pm to Tds & Beer
Dak had his 100 yds by the end of the 3rd quarter
Posted on 10/9/13 at 10:32 am to Tds & Beer
Sometimes I'm not sure if Pank ever really watches football
Posted on 10/9/13 at 12:20 pm to NIH
Holy shat. Did someone really say that Brunetti was a better runner than Dak?
Posted on 10/10/13 at 1:48 pm to Klongdawg
quote:
Holy shat. Did someone really prove that Brunetti was a better runner than Dak?
yes
Posted on 10/10/13 at 3:45 pm to Klongdawg
quote:
Holy shat. Did someone really say that Brunetti was a better runner than Dak?
And they haven't backed down from it either. Crazy rebs
This post was edited on 10/10/13 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 10/11/13 at 12:44 pm to Tds & Beer
I fail to see the misunderstanding you MSU fans are having in this argument.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News