Started By
Message

Which Aggie fan did this?
Posted on 4/24/13 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 4/24/13 at 5:04 pm
So there's a vote to choose the logo of the new "College Football Playbook".
LINK
Someone cheated and chose the worst logo of them all...
From CFP Facebook
LINK
Someone cheated and chose the worst logo of them all...

From CFP Facebook
quote:
Our contractor running the logo vote has informed us that it has caught a cheater with an IP address in Austin, TX who cast 50,251 votes for logo number four, in violation of our contest rules. While we're pleased to know how popular our site is, this individual's IP address has been blocked and all his votes have been removed from logo four's tally.
As a result, the correct, updated tally shows logo one has 26%, logo two has 38%, logo three has 27% and logo 4 has 9%, with more than 60,000 votes having been cast in less than 24 hours.
This post was edited on 4/24/13 at 5:05 pm
Posted on 4/24/13 at 5:06 pm to GEAUXmedic
Aggie.
Austin.
Seems legit.
Austin.
Seems legit.
Posted on 4/24/13 at 5:08 pm to GEAUXmedic
Honestly, all of those logos suck.
Posted on 4/24/13 at 5:09 pm to BrerTiger
quote:
Honestly, all of those logos suck.
This. I bet someone on the fark board could come up with something way better.
Posted on 4/24/13 at 5:10 pm to GEAUXmedic
I voted for 1. But I don't particularly care for any of them
Posted on 4/24/13 at 5:10 pm to BrerTiger
quote:
Honestly, all of those logos suck.
This. I can't wait to show my graphic design professor tomorrow.
Posted on 4/24/13 at 5:33 pm to BrerTiger
They could be worse. Anybody remember when the University of California tried to change their logo to this?
Posted on 4/24/13 at 5:38 pm to GEAUXmedic
quote:
Someone cheated and chose the worst logo of them all
I've spent a few minutes studying this now and I can't even decide which is the worst. This is like a who's hottest except with a bunch of fugly chicks. Deciding which is most fugly is just beyond me.
Posted on 4/24/13 at 5:39 pm to GEAUXmedic
quote:
logo three has 27%


It's the least sucky.
Posted on 4/24/13 at 5:41 pm to Monsters and Men
That was to celebrate the 100th year of the UC school system iirc
Posted on 4/24/13 at 5:42 pm to BrerTiger
quote:
Honestly, all of those logos suck.
Posted on 4/24/13 at 6:02 pm to GEAUXmedic
Not one of those logos has TNA. Screw 'em.
Posted on 4/24/13 at 6:08 pm to WestCoastAg
Maybe, they were planning on having it replace the old logo for most things.
Posted on 4/24/13 at 6:15 pm to Monsters and Men
The script cal was never going to be replaced
Posted on 4/24/13 at 6:43 pm to WestCoastAg
LINK
quote:
Dooley defended the contemporary logo, which was designed by an in-house team and started appearing six months ago. Critics had latched onto "an unfortunate and false narrative, which framed the matter as an either-or choice between a venerated UC seal and a newly designed monogram," he said. The graphic would not have replaced the official seal on diplomas or official letterhead, but was meant to bring a more modern look to websites and publications in UC's fundraising, recruiting and public affairs campaigns. The symbol was accompanied by the text "University of California," a fact its critics ignored, officials complained
Posted on 4/24/13 at 6:45 pm to aTm's conference now
You are a sad, obsessed individual.
Popular
Back to top
