Started By
Message
re: I can't remember the SEC ever being this bad in basketball...
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:23 pm to mizzoukills
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:23 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Mizzou is 8-1
8-1 in what?
1
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:26 pm to Cheese Grits
You know what...bball. You said 8-2 earlier. Get that shite right.
We've only lost to then #2 Louisville. We should be ranked higher.
We've only lost to then #2 Louisville. We should be ranked higher.
This post was edited on 12/16/12 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:28 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
You said 8-2 earlier. Get that shite right.
See how new you are to basketball. Go back and re read the post. I stand by 8-2 for Mizzourah in that post.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:32 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Women's?
Wow that was fast!
FWIW, I think you need at least 4 NCAA Championship banners in the rafters to even apply to the elite club. In the SEC that means only UK men and UT women members.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:33 pm to Govt Tide
we have a basketball team?
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:35 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
we have a basketball team?
You guys have a gymnastics team too.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:37 pm to Cheese Grits
You and the Arky fans keep talking about the elite club as if Mizzou fans believe we belong there or something.
We've never said that.
However we have a better bball program than most of the conference.
So, here's a question...if a school wins 1 bball championship and then does nothing significant for the next 20 or 30 years, are they still considered an elite program over a school that makes the tournament 9 out 10 times per decade (essentially every year)?
Just curious whether we're dealing with real logic or tard logic.
We've never said that.
However we have a better bball program than most of the conference.
So, here's a question...if a school wins 1 bball championship and then does nothing significant for the next 20 or 30 years, are they still considered an elite program over a school that makes the tournament 9 out 10 times per decade (essentially every year)?
Just curious whether we're dealing with real logic or tard logic.
This post was edited on 12/16/12 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:41 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
over a school that makes the tournament
Losing to #15 seeds isn't impressing anyone here.
Being a stepping stone school for coaches isn't impressing anyone either.
Basically, no one in the big3 is impressed by Mizzou.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:42 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
You guys have a gymnastics team too.
why the hell aren't i notified about these things?
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:45 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
However we have a better bball program than most of the conference.
Except for the fact that alot of programs in the conference have achieved things Mizzou is incapable of...sure.
BTW, they don't take banners down because you have the worst decade in your history. Arkansas basketball always has been and always will be on another level than stepping stone Programs like Mizzou
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:46 pm to DaleDenton
Dale,
I like you. You're like an Arky version of me, and I have a very high opinion of myself.
Let me guess...the entire SEC is annually impressed with the Arkansas program. Your program is equivalent to Duke, Noth Carolina, Kansas, and Kentucky.
Didn't realize I was in the presence of greatness.
I like you. You're like an Arky version of me, and I have a very high opinion of myself.
Let me guess...the entire SEC is annually impressed with the Arkansas program. Your program is equivalent to Duke, Noth Carolina, Kansas, and Kentucky.
Didn't realize I was in the presence of greatness.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:48 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
We've never said that.
To be fair Semo on the previous page listed Mizzou as one of the Big 3. Now it depends on what your qualifiers are for the Big 3. If we're talking about this season then it's valid. If we're talking historically I don't think so (just my opinion).
quote:
However we have a better bball program than most of the conference.
You have a better team this season. You're probably in better shape going forward then a lot of the SEC schools.
quote:
So, here's a question...if a school wins 1 bball championship and then does nothing significant for the next 20 or 30 years, are they still considered an elite program over a school that makes the tournament 9 out 10 times per decade (essentially every year)?
Arkansas made the NCAA Tournament majority of the 90s (all but one season I believe) and half of the 00s.
Arkansas as a program has been consistently better then Missouri. The stats back it up IMO. But that doesn't mean Mizzou isn't in better shape going forward though.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:50 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
why the hell aren't i notified about these things?
Well, we have been keeping from you for some time but I thought you should know.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:50 pm to LSUbase13
quote:quote:
LSU baseball and UK basketball are elite
LSUbase13 posted: Uhh.. South Carolina baseball is elite. I think most will say that it is currently the best program in the SEC.
Thank you ... we need four more before we can claim to be on LSU's level. But yes, we are probably considered the finest baseball program in the country right now according to the baseball boards. Even the SoCal fans are bowing-down, but we've got to wait and see how the coaching change goes.
Heard there is a direct line between Skip Bertman and Ray Tanner ... they don't even have to dial a number, they just pick-up the phone and the other one is there.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:51 pm to DaleDenton
NCAA Titles by SEC schools:
Kentucky: 8
Florida: 2
Arkansas: 1
Final Four Appearances by SEC schools:
Kentucky: 15
Arkansas: 6
LSU, Florida: 4
Mississippi State: 1
Losses as a #2 seed to a #15 seed:
Missouri: 1
South Carolina: 1
Losses as a #3 seed to a #14 seed:
Missouri: 1
South Carolina: 1
Losses as a #4 seed to a #13 seed:
Vanderbilt: 2
Missouri: 1
Mississippi: 1
LSU: 1
Kentucky: 8
Florida: 2
Arkansas: 1
Final Four Appearances by SEC schools:
Kentucky: 15
Arkansas: 6
LSU, Florida: 4
Mississippi State: 1
Losses as a #2 seed to a #15 seed:
Missouri: 1
South Carolina: 1
Losses as a #3 seed to a #14 seed:
Missouri: 1
South Carolina: 1
Losses as a #4 seed to a #13 seed:
Vanderbilt: 2
Missouri: 1
Mississippi: 1
LSU: 1
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:52 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Duke, Noth Carolina, Kansas, and Kentucky.
One of these is not like the other 3
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:52 pm to Govt Tide
This year's Georgia team is the worst I have seen it. I think we are worse than the post probation Felton teams. I can only imagine how bad we would be without Kentavious Caldwell-Pope.
This post was edited on 12/16/12 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:53 pm to BluegrassBelle
Semo was talking last year and this year, and y'all know it.
We were there quite a bit in the 90s and 00s too.
We never said Arky hasn't accomplished more in their history. And the whole stepping stone thing is a farce. Everyone knew Anderson had his eye on Arky from day one.
We got his best. Arky won't go to the Elite 8, Final 4, or Champsionship with Suitcase. He'll be fired within a couple of years.
We were there quite a bit in the 90s and 00s too.
We never said Arky hasn't accomplished more in their history. And the whole stepping stone thing is a farce. Everyone knew Anderson had his eye on Arky from day one.
We got his best. Arky won't go to the Elite 8, Final 4, or Champsionship with Suitcase. He'll be fired within a couple of years.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 3:56 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
To be fair Semo on the previous page listed Mizzou as one of the Big 3.
To be fair it is only the big1 and some schools who have elevated above the fray. The distance from #1 and the next 2 - 4 is great indeed.
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News