Started By
Message
Harris Poll Voters give their reasoning on twitter
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:48 pm
Have seen 2 Harris Poll Voters release their ballots and reasoning on twitter:
Wish more voters would tweet their votes and reasoning.
quote:
George Schroeder: Columnist, The Register-Guard (Eugene, OR). Contributor, SI.com
1. LSU
2. Oklahoma State
3. Alabama
Reason: I vote for 'Plus One'...
quote:
Mike Griffith: GoVolsXtra.com Knoxville News Sentinel UT hoops beat
1. LSU
2. Alabama
3. Oklahoma State
Reason: Came down to this: who do I think wins game between Tide and Cowboys.
Wish more voters would tweet their votes and reasoning.
This post was edited on 12/4/11 at 12:54 pm
6
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:50 pm to volfan30
quote:
Reason: Came down to this: who do I think wins game between Tide and Cowboys.
And it's an opinion, not a fact.
A rematch such as this should be avoided at all costs!
Same conference
one is champ, one is not.
Champ versus champ = lsu vs. osu
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:52 pm to volfan30
So....voters are suppose to vote by who they think will win? And he has bama only at #2? Interesting.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:53 pm to volfan30
quote:
Mike Griffith: GoVolsXtra.com Knoxville News Sentinel UT hoops beat
frick you Mike Griffith
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:55 pm to volfan30
quote:
Reason: Came down to this: who do I think wins game between Tide and Cowboys.
The problem is that these are all media guys. They want as much controversy as possible, that's what sells.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:02 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
A rematch such as this should be avoided at all costs!
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:05 pm to volfan30
Just shows it all comes down to their personal opinion
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:06 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
A rematch such as this should be avoided at all costs!
seriously the system is NOT designed for a rematch from the same conference
It's stupid if you think about it...
What was purpose of the regular season and SECCG?
To declare the winner from that conference...
not provide 2 good teams in the National Championship...It's not national when you keep it in the SEC
This post was edited on 12/4/11 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:06 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
At least these guys are giving their reasons......I respect that.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:08 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
A team that just lost to a 6 and 6 team shouldnt even be in consideration, such a fraud. The discussion should be between Bama, Oregon, and Stanford.
This post was edited on 12/4/11 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:08 pm to Indfanfromcol
quote:He meant which team would win if OSU played Bama, not which one would beat LSU.
So....voters are suppose to vote by who they think will win? And he has bama only at #2? Interesting.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:16 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
A team that just lost to a 6 and 6 team shouldnt even be in consideration, such a fraud. The discussion should be between Bama, Oregon, and Stanford.
A team that's had their chance at home and didn't even win their division in the conference has no business being considered. Bama is the fraud here and their creampuff schedule
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:21 pm to Crompdaddy8
LOL @ A Tennessee guy putting Alabama over oSu, wow...
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:21 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
And it's an opinion, not a fact.
You must have missed the " I think" part of the link
This post was edited on 12/4/11 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:21 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
A team that just lost to a 6 and 6 team shouldnt even be in consideration, such a fraud.
A team that couldn't even take care of business at home, didn't win its conference (let alone division) shouldn't be in consideration. But keep hanging your hat on that LSU loss at home.
ALABAMA: Where our losses are better than yours.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:22 pm to Prominentwon
Both seemed to do some real analytical evaluation.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:22 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
seriously the system is NOT designed for a rematch from the same conference It's stupid if you think about it... What was purpose of the regular season and SECCG? To declare the winner from that conference... not provide 2 good teams in the National Championship...It's not national when you keep it in the SEC
Is that why the specifically put the "3 teams from 1 conference" clause in?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:23 pm to volfan30
quote:
Mike Griffith: GoVolsXtra.com Knoxville News Sentinel UT hoops beat
1. LSU
2. Alabama
3. Oklahoma State
Reason: Came down to this: who do I think wins game between Tide and Cowboys.
Wonder who this guy picked when it was OU vs FSU, Miami vs OSU, LSU vs OU, UT vs USC, LSU vs OSU, etc.?
These "experts" are not so expert at picking the best team even when it comes down to only 2. Their opinions are basically worthless.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:24 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
A team that's had their chance at home and didn't even win their division in the conference has no business being considered. Bama is the fraud here and their creampuff schedule
I can't wait to see your meltdown when we get in.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:25 pm to ThatCrimsonSwagga
I'm all about winning against whoever we play, it just seems as if Bama makes it and wins it will spoil the whole thing.
Making LSU go through more, only to be snipped by the (Media Dream Team) that got an extra try and was allowed to play LSU again.
Whatever, it's not worth talking about until we find out the rankings, and even then what's done is done. We'll just have to roll with it.
Making LSU go through more, only to be snipped by the (Media Dream Team) that got an extra try and was allowed to play LSU again.
Whatever, it's not worth talking about until we find out the rankings, and even then what's done is done. We'll just have to roll with it.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News