Started By
Message
Geez the Heisman is a joke
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:21 am
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:21 am
once again it goes to a good player on a great team. Congrats TR and Bama for yet again another undeserving heisman trophy. Bama would be 10-1 without TR. Baylor would be 2-9 without RGIII. Period. He is the best & most explosive player. The Heisman has a chance to get back to what it's supposed to be about but it won't. So again congrats TR on winning a trophy you don't deserve.
20
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:22 am to ShreveportHog94
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:22 am to ShreveportHog94
Stop, please God just stop.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:23 am to TreyAnastasio
TR wont win it sorry
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:23 am to ShreveportHog94
Oh...
You mad.
ETA - I am not so sure he will win it. FWIW
You mad.
ETA - I am not so sure he will win it. FWIW
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 11:24 am
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:23 am to TreyAnastasio
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:23 am to ShreveportHog94
Seems like you're mad brah.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:23 am to Dribble
He real mad
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:23 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
once again it goes to an incredible player on a great team
FIFY
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:24 am to TreyAnastasio
So TR deserves a heisman more? Is that what you are suggesting?
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:24 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
The Heisman has a chance to get back to what it's supposed to be about but it won't
Yeah Cam Newton shouldn't have won...
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:24 am to ShreveportHog94
Monte Ball deserves it more than TR. And RGIII deserves it more than anyone.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:24 am to ShreveportHog94
It depends. If Heisman is supposed to be "best player," I think it goes to Richardson.
If it's supposed to be "Most Valuable," then it goes to Luck or RGIII, because their teams would absolutely suck without them.
If it's supposed to be "Most Valuable," then it goes to Luck or RGIII, because their teams would absolutely suck without them.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:24 am to ShreveportHog94
Two in three years and they both piss off the rest of the SEC. 
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:24 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Bama would be 10-1 without TR. Baylor would be 2-9 without RGIII. Period. He is the best & most explosive player.
Agree.
quote:
congrats TR on winning a trophy you don't deserve.
Disagree.
RGIII should win, in my opinion. But to say TR isn't deserving is a bit of a stretch, and devalues your argument.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:25 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
So TR deserves a heisman more? Is that what you are suggesting?
Yes, he's the best player in the country. But I was laughing at your overall madness.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:25 am to C
quote:
Yeah Cam Newton shouldn't have won...
haha
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:25 am to ShreveportHog94
Since when is Richardson some lock to win it? The Andrew Luck pain train is still up and running.
I agree with RGIII though, but this post reeks of U MAD syndrome.
I agree with RGIII though, but this post reeks of U MAD syndrome.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:26 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
ShreveportHog94
And people wonder why we don't claim Shreveport.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 11:26 am to Ross
quote:
Since when is Richardson some lock to win it?
Hes not. Heisman Pundit has him at 3 this week.
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 11:27 am
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News