Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 37
Started By
Message
locked post

Apparently there are tapes Auburn- rut rohhhhhh

Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:32 am
Posted by CoonassBulldog
Member since Sep 2008
6913 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:32 am
Scott Moore is on 105.5 WNSP in Mobile right now (8:40 a.m. 2-25-11) and says there are tapes of Cecil discussing payments with MSU while Cam was in the room listening to his father discuss

Cecil specifically says Cam was in the room


quote:

The NCAA had these tapes since the week MSU played UGA and Auburn played USC... The NCAA went to Auburn the week of the Auburn Georgia game and advised Auburn to sit Cam, but they didn't
.

It's why I said he would sit for the Georgia game- I had heard this then too


It's about to get fun

Posted by beaver
The 755 Club
Member since Sep 2009
46861 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:33 am to
Then why did they rule him eligible after that
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
52621 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:33 am to
But yet they reinstated him right before the SECC? Makes sense.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37471 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Then why did they rule him eligible after that


Probably some more of coondawg's bs.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54696 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:35 am to
You have to be the dumbest person alive.
Posted by Dribble
Hey, nice marmot.
Member since Jun 2008
9576 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:37 am to
After your last thread like this, I think you need to take a break....
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
13484 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:37 am to
Is this not the same guy who said the same thing on a Huntsville station last night? Also, didn't the show host last night say he had heard them? If the host of the show had the access to be able to hear them, why didn't they play them on the air?
Posted by CoonassBulldog
Member since Sep 2008
6913 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Then why did they rule him eligible after that



The committee that ruled on it did so based on Auburn's investigation

Different committee had the tapes is my understanding
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
52621 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:38 am to
quote:

The committee that ruled on it did so based on Auburn's investigation

Different committee had the tapes is my understanding


And you really believe this?
Posted by beaver
The 755 Club
Member since Sep 2009
46861 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:38 am to
Tha frick? You think they wouldn't communicate amongst themselves?
Posted by vuvuzela
Oregon
Member since Jun 2010
14663 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:39 am to
Let it go man...just let it go.
Posted by ever43
Raleigh, NC
Member since Aug 2009
2947 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:39 am to
quote:

CoonassBulldog


Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
22235 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:40 am to
quote:

The committee that ruled on it did so based on Auburn's investigation

Different committee had the tapes is my understanding



While I'm not saying any of this tape stuff is true, Auburn fans need to understand that the above statement is true as far as the two different committees anyway. That's why I've maintained my position that this isn't over.
Posted by Hawgeye
tFlagship Brothel
Member since Jun 2009
32022 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:40 am to
Miss State fans need to be more concerned about how to win more than 1 game against West competition.

Get over the fact that Cam chose Au over MooState.

Posted by Dribble
Hey, nice marmot.
Member since Jun 2008
9576 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Scott Moore is on 105.5 WNSP in Mobile

FWIW - The SECr gets info quicker than he does.
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
13484 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:41 am to
So the NCAA comes to Auburn after doing an investigation and says "You really shouldn't play Cam this weekend against UGA."

Auburn goes ahead and plays him against UGA and Bama.

Auburn then says "Hey NCAA, we agree with you, something is up, we are declairing Cam inelligible. Will you look at our info and see if he can be reinstated?"

The NCAA then says "OK, we wll look at your info, but completely ignore our info where we said you probably should sit him. OK, he can play again."
Posted by CoonassBulldog
Member since Sep 2008
6913 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:42 am to
quote:

You think they wouldn't communicate amongst themselves


they have rules and committees- and reinstatement committee's rule in that school's investigation (in this case- Auburn)

Another committee does the investigating and then rules based on the NCAA's findings
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36703 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Scott Moore


Is this the same guy who does sports personality impersonations and got in some legal trouble himself about 3 yrs ago ? That's a source I'd sure put a lot of stock in.
Posted by reb13
Member since May 2010
10905 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:43 am to
Wouldn't this be bad for state too? Considering they were offering money too?
Posted by BenHOGan
Kansas City
Member since Sep 2005
1775 posts
Posted on 2/25/11 at 9:43 am to
quote:

But yet they reinstated him right before the SECC? Makes sense.


I got no dog in this fight. Don't really care at this point what happens to Aub, MSU, or Cam. But let's just think of some possibilities here.

Is it not plausible to think that perhaps the NCAA was strictly covering their own asses with this move? The logic would be that, even though they appear to have a "smoking gun," this case is so high profile that they would prefer to take time to investigate ALL leads and gather as much evidence and info as possible before making a final determination of eligibility. The logic would appear to be that if you rule him ineligible and he somehow turns out to be innocent, then you can't really give him back those games he lost. However, if you let him continue to play and he turns out to be guilty later, you can strip him and his team of anything they may have won with him there.

To me, that seems to be a plausible explanation for why the NCAA might go ahead and allow a person to remain eligible, even when they have information that may eventually convict the person of wrongdoing.

I think most people who are not absolute die-hard Auburn fans feel like, given the fact that Cam and his dad appear to be very close, and the fact that his dad was openly shopping him is not in dispute, the only real conclusion a logical person can draw is that Cam was in on the bit all along. Cam has a track record of deceit and dishonesty, and there's no reason to believe he is just very comfortable denying his role in this, so long as it keeps him on the field and progressing toward a huge payday in the NFL. What ever is left in his wake at Auburn is really of no consequence to him now. He's used Auburn to get him what he needs, and he's moved on.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 37
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 37Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter