Started By
Message
POLL>>>>
Posted on 11/8/09 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 11/8/09 at 4:43 pm
So, how many of you believe that the controversial interception call was:
a.) A good call.
b.) Should have been overturned by video evidence.
c.) was correct as there was not enough evidence to overturn the call.
d.) believe that the referees were helping fix the game for Alabama.
Just so we know where everyone stands.
Another interception thread. kms.
a.) A good call.
b.) Should have been overturned by video evidence.
c.) was correct as there was not enough evidence to overturn the call.
d.) believe that the referees were helping fix the game for Alabama.
Just so we know where everyone stands.
Another interception thread. kms.
33
Posted on 11/8/09 at 4:44 pm to UPT
b.) Should have been overturned by video evidence.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 4:45 pm to UPT
b)
Can we let it go now?
Can we let it go now?
Posted on 11/8/09 at 4:45 pm to UPT
b
Posted on 11/8/09 at 4:47 pm to UPT
quote:
b.) Should have been overturned by video evidence.
And it is really not debateable. Clear video evidence = overturn the call. Hard to believe how it was missed.
For the record, I do not buy into consipiracy theories that the SEC is trying to help Bama. I would not be surprised by bias by the replay official since it was so obvious and was not overturned however.
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 11/8/09 at 4:47 pm to UPT
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
Posted on 11/8/09 at 4:49 pm to UPT
Definately B.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 4:49 pm to UPT
b
Posted on 11/8/09 at 4:52 pm to UPT
B
Posted on 11/8/09 at 5:00 pm to UPT
C. And it would have made no difference. I just don't understand why we were throwing the ball then to begin with.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 6:50 pm to UPT
A- a good call--
"Ball Out of Bounds
ARTICLE 3. a. A ball not in player possession, other than a kick that scores a field goal, is out of bounds when it touches the ground, a player, a game official or anything else that is on or outside a boundary line."
Julio is out of bounds when he touches the ball simultaneously with Peterson. Even before Peterson could tuck the ball, the ball was dead.
"Ball Out of Bounds
ARTICLE 3. a. A ball not in player possession, other than a kick that scores a field goal, is out of bounds when it touches the ground, a player, a game official or anything else that is on or outside a boundary line."
Julio is out of bounds when he touches the ball simultaneously with Peterson. Even before Peterson could tuck the ball, the ball was dead.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 6:51 pm to UPT
b
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:06 pm to UPT
N/A
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:08 pm to UPT
Article 3. Ball Out of Bounds Reply -
A ball not in player possession, other than a kick that scores a field goal, is out of bounds when it touches the ground, a player, a game official or anything else that is on or outside a boundary line.
Julio touched the ball at the same time Peterson did and he was out of bounds. Dead ball.
A ball not in player possession, other than a kick that scores a field goal, is out of bounds when it touches the ground, a player, a game official or anything else that is on or outside a boundary line.
Julio touched the ball at the same time Peterson did and he was out of bounds. Dead ball.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:35 pm to UPT
B.
But that doesn't mean that I think that LSU would have won. Only that we would have at least had a chance to win.
But that doesn't mean that I think that LSU would have won. Only that we would have at least had a chance to win.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:50 pm to UPT
Should have been overturned by video evidence......but it didn't cost us the game.....our coaching cost us the game.......the better team won yesterday, no doubt.......good luck the rest of the season 
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:51 pm to UPT
c.) was correct as there was not enough evidence to overturn the call.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:57 pm to UPT
B
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:59 pm to UPT
Hate to say it but I have to go with C
Congrats Bama on the victory
Congrats Bama on the victory
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News