Started By
Message
Any legs to this ACC thing?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:03 am
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:03 am
Can't be right? I mean myself, and so many other fans hate that conference with a passion. I would imagine that the board of trustees are made up of folks with long enough memories to hate them even more than I do.
No way this happens.
Right?
No way this happens.
Right?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:28 am to Lonnie Utah
I wouldn't be totally against it if I'm being honest. At least we may actually be able to compete for conference championships in football. I know we didn't do it then that much, but now that we've had decades in the SEC, we're more of a known commodity now.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:43 am to southpawcock
ACC is a dying conference
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:59 am to CNB
Maybe they're trying to change that. 
Posted on 1/13/26 at 12:09 pm to Lonnie Utah
If we went back to the ACC i'd be very pissed. I grew up the son of someone who was in school during the late 60's, early 70's. No reason we should ever go back to that shithole of a conference.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 1:17 pm to Lonnie Utah
Offseason bullshite. Zero chance.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 9:04 am to Lonnie Utah
Depends on where you think we are going ...
Over a century ago we had
Super Conferences
Injury
Student Athlete
Paying Players
Gambling
Media Rights (granted it was radio then)
etc.
Things were getting so out of hand the POTUS and Congress had to step in and we got the NCAA (Vanderbilt was a leader and interesting documents in their archives if you are on campus). 2 Division (B1G and SEC) with longer meaningless seasons and lots of playoffs.
This can go 2 ways
#1 College sports, especially the ones making the most money, will become semi pro feeders for the NFL and NBA and lose interest of their fans (donors) and distances to travel for rank and file fans to attend events.
#2 We will return to a century ago when local / regional rivalries and actual academics hold sway and the price of the average fan drops greatly and renews their passion and interest.
Hopefully it is #2 and not #1 as both Cocks and Cats had Top 25 attendance numbers in the nation when neither was good on the gridiron.
Over a century ago we had
Super Conferences
Injury
Student Athlete
Paying Players
Gambling
Media Rights (granted it was radio then)
etc.
Things were getting so out of hand the POTUS and Congress had to step in and we got the NCAA (Vanderbilt was a leader and interesting documents in their archives if you are on campus). 2 Division (B1G and SEC) with longer meaningless seasons and lots of playoffs.
This can go 2 ways
#1 College sports, especially the ones making the most money, will become semi pro feeders for the NFL and NBA and lose interest of their fans (donors) and distances to travel for rank and file fans to attend events.
#2 We will return to a century ago when local / regional rivalries and actual academics hold sway and the price of the average fan drops greatly and renews their passion and interest.
Hopefully it is #2 and not #1 as both Cocks and Cats had Top 25 attendance numbers in the nation when neither was good on the gridiron.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:39 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
#2 We will return to a century ago when local / regional rivalries and actual academics hold sway and the price of the average fan drops greatly and renews their passion and interest.
Hopefully it is #2 and not #1 as both Cocks and Cats had Top 25 attendance numbers in the nation when neither was good on the gridiron.
absolutely hope it is this, but with TV and media today I doubt it. A century ago the games weren't accessible unless it was a large game, or you were in person. Now, everything is on TV. As nice as that is, it is almost too nice. Why would you spend all the money to get a tailgating spot, hold season tickets, buy season tickets, buy merch, buy gameday food/drink....when you can sit at home and watch.
On one hand I get fans being upset that stadiums are dumping cheap seats and building more suites, but I don't blame the universities. Companies and rich people want to be there for the event. The casual fan is almost just as happy now at home
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:37 pm to GamecockUltimate
quote:
Companies and rich people want to be there for the event. The casual fan is almost just as happy now at home
Therein lies the rub
Take college baseball
Not the fastest paced or most exciting, it drew loyalty from the on site event and the passing of interpersonal moments from one generation to another. You went with maybe your grandfather and all the people sitting around you were like you in they were average people who showed up good or bad because, aside from the game on the field, you had a true community of local people in the stands to witness the event.
To this day nothing feels like the World Series on TV if I am not serving hot dogs, Cracker Jacks, and ice cream or the game on the TV falls flat. Live events enable all 5 senses while TV just focus on sight and sound. TV also gives you their view in a commercially oriented format while a live game means conversing with long time fans around you with no product to hawk.
The more they pander to the big money now, the more they kill off the next generation of devoted fans that sustain you through both the good times and bad. I for one was much happier to have the Cocks in the SEC than the Taters as my youth has a common DNA with coming even when you are not winning. This is why I think you have 2 options as one encourages excess at the top and the other implies an implosion to restart at the bottom and build again.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:36 pm to Lonnie Utah
Zero chance this happens.
Popular
Back to top

5







