Started By
Message
LSU Twitter Lawyers Threw In The Towel Fast!
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:30 am
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:30 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
No, I don't think I would. These cute little rev share agreements are a fun little break from what I do. Carry on.
quote:
Good for them. Demond will still be QB at LSU next season
quote:
Again, you can have provisions in an agreement that say anything, that doesn't 1. make it enforceable; 2. mean the counterparty cannot breach. The question is what remedy is appropriate and available? Damages is the answer. And I would take my chances with the BIG10 lawyers.
DEMOND RETURNING
LSU, stop trying to be associated with all the ills of modern football. Nobody likes your crime ridden squad and location already, so enough is enough.
13
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:31 am to jangalang
Auburn hired ANOTHER head coach from the G5 
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:32 am to jangalang
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:33 am to jangalang
LSU and Williams were cast as the bad guy, but the headline should be the insanity that is the Big 10 rev share contract.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:36 am to SammyTiger
No. The headline is the conference adopting template style legal protections that protect their interests and secondarily football itself.
You know greed is a sin, right?
So is coveting what is not yours.
You know greed is a sin, right?
So is coveting what is not yours.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:59 am to jangalang
Have you read the parts of the contract that have come out online?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:03 am to jangalang
LSU aside, Are we sure this is the end of the Williams situation? It does seem like a quick resignation by his side but does Washington or the fans really want him to be the quarterback next season? I have a hard time believing he will be there next season.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:06 am to jangalang
Auburn fans preaching to us about ethics after hiring Hugh fricking Freeze, and failing miserably in the process.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:08 am to jangalang
The premise of your thread is entirely false.
He was talked back into Washington by the Washington head coach.
The fact remains that the clauses of the rev sharing agreements in Washington violate state, law, court rulings and athe house settlement.
Those agreements that bar transfer or have clauses barring the athletes from earning NIL or playing for another team are illegal and will not be enforcable
He was talked back into Washington by the Washington head coach.
The fact remains that the clauses of the rev sharing agreements in Washington violate state, law, court rulings and athe house settlement.
Those agreements that bar transfer or have clauses barring the athletes from earning NIL or playing for another team are illegal and will not be enforcable
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:08 am to jangalang
BIG Ten having iron clad contracts be interesting if smart players avoid them
If in fact they are iron clad
If in fact they are iron clad
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:09 am to Ellis_Hugh
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:09 am to jangalang
looking for Auburn on the portal rankings list
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:11 am to jangalang
quote:Dunno, seems like that’s better than hiring Hugh & being associated with the ills of bygone football.
LSU, stop trying to be associated with all the ills of modern football.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:14 am to stitchop
She has to be trolling at this point.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:14 am to jangalang
Auburn trash talking LSU
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:19 am to jangalang
One of these is eventually going to make it to court, the contract won’t hold up, and we’ll be back to total chaos.
I think we didn’t want to take the risk. LSU played it safe here, but the court scenario will eventually play out with a non-QB transfer & these Rev share contracts will be proven to have no teeth. Just a matter of time.
For the record, I don’t like it — but these cases always go the players’ way.
I think we didn’t want to take the risk. LSU played it safe here, but the court scenario will eventually play out with a non-QB transfer & these Rev share contracts will be proven to have no teeth. Just a matter of time.
For the record, I don’t like it — but these cases always go the players’ way.
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 10:33 am
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:31 am to DeathByTossDive225
I can appreciate this take. The contract isn’t evil, even if it is unenforceable, we don’t know. Washington is simply trying to exercise some right to have their contracts mean SOMETHING in modern football and honestly, I think we need to root for that to gain some stability.
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 10:34 am
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:34 am to SammyTiger
frick no he hasn’t
He’s a legal expert like captdalton is
He’s a legal expert like captdalton is
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:38 am to Captain Crown
quote:
Auburn trash talking LSU
The lack of self-awareness..
You guys trash talk Alabama who is so much greater than LSU it's more than double the difference between LSU and Auburn
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:40 am to jangalang
Ah well. Would’ve been nice. We’ll be fine.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News