Started By
Message
2025 Conference Bowl Records
Posted on 1/3/26 at 11:18 am
Posted on 1/3/26 at 11:18 am
NCAA - Track which conferences are winning 2025-26 college football bowl season
Conference (BOWL TEAMS) record winning percentage
AMERICAN...............................5-4 .555
ACC...........................................8-4 .667
BIG 12.......................................4-4 .500
BIG TEN....................................9-4 .692
CONFERENCE USA.................4-3 .571
INDEPENDENTS......................0-1 .000
MAC..........................................2-3 .400
MOUNTAIN WEST....................2-5 .286
PAC-12.....................................1-0 1.000
SEC...........................................4-9 .308
SUN BELT.................................4-6 .400
SEC — (11 teams)
Record: 4-9
No. 9 Alabama 34, No. 8 Oklahoma 24
No. 10 Miami (Fla.) 10, No. 7 Texas A&M 3 | (CFP First Round)
No. 6 Ole Miss 41, No. 20 Tulane 10 (CFP First Round)
No. 19 Virginia 13, Missouri 7 (Gator Bowl)
No. 21 Houston 38, LSU 35 (Texas Bowl)
Illinois 30, Tennessee 28 (Music City Bowl)
No. 23 Iowa 34, No. 14 Vanderbilt 27 (ReliaQuest Bowl)
No. 13 Texas 41, No. 18 Michigan 27
No. 1 Indiana 38, No. 9 Alabama 3
No. 6 Ole Miss 39, No. 3 Georgia 34
Wake Forest 43, Mississippi State 29 (Duke's Mayo Bowl)
No. 6 Ole Miss vs. No. 10 Miami on Jan. 8 (CFP semifinal)
Conference (BOWL TEAMS) record winning percentage
AMERICAN...............................5-4 .555
ACC...........................................8-4 .667
BIG 12.......................................4-4 .500
BIG TEN....................................9-4 .692
CONFERENCE USA.................4-3 .571
INDEPENDENTS......................0-1 .000
MAC..........................................2-3 .400
MOUNTAIN WEST....................2-5 .286
PAC-12.....................................1-0 1.000
SEC...........................................4-9 .308
SUN BELT.................................4-6 .400
SEC — (11 teams)
Record: 4-9
No. 9 Alabama 34, No. 8 Oklahoma 24
No. 10 Miami (Fla.) 10, No. 7 Texas A&M 3 | (CFP First Round)
No. 6 Ole Miss 41, No. 20 Tulane 10 (CFP First Round)
No. 19 Virginia 13, Missouri 7 (Gator Bowl)
No. 21 Houston 38, LSU 35 (Texas Bowl)
Illinois 30, Tennessee 28 (Music City Bowl)
No. 23 Iowa 34, No. 14 Vanderbilt 27 (ReliaQuest Bowl)
No. 13 Texas 41, No. 18 Michigan 27
No. 1 Indiana 38, No. 9 Alabama 3
No. 6 Ole Miss 39, No. 3 Georgia 34
Wake Forest 43, Mississippi State 29 (Duke's Mayo Bowl)
No. 6 Ole Miss vs. No. 10 Miami on Jan. 8 (CFP semifinal)
3
Posted on 1/3/26 at 11:22 am to Ptins944
The SEC flew too close to the Sun.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 11:27 am to Ptins944
BIG TEN....................................9-4 .692
ACC...........................................8-4 .667
CONFERENCE USA.................4-3 .571
AMERICAN...............................5-4 .555
BIG 12.......................................4-4 .500
MAC..........................................2-3 .400
SUN BELT.................................4-6 .400
SEC...........................................4-9 .308
MOUNTAIN WEST....................2-5 .286
ACC...........................................8-4 .667
CONFERENCE USA.................4-3 .571
AMERICAN...............................5-4 .555
BIG 12.......................................4-4 .500
MAC..........................................2-3 .400
SUN BELT.................................4-6 .400
SEC...........................................4-9 .308
MOUNTAIN WEST....................2-5 .286
Posted on 1/3/26 at 11:33 am to wadewilson
quote:
SEC...........................................4-9 .308
And two of those wins are sec vs sec
Posted on 1/3/26 at 11:35 am to hookem2522
That does not say what you think it says, because 2 of the losses are also sec vs sec.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 11:46 am to wadewilson
Outside of the playoffs, bowl games mean absolutely shite. They are certainly not a good measure of conference vs conference strength.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 11:46 am to wadewilson
Take them out. 2-7 is even worse.
Yeesh.
Yeesh.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 11:48 am to PineyWoodsHog
"Outside of the playoffs, bowl games mean absolutely shite. They are certainly not a good measure of conference vs conference strength."
That's a convenient message given the results this year. I have a feeling that SEC fans would be crowing if it were the other way around. Oh, by the way, some of these results happened in playoff games and bowl games like the Orange Bowl. I thought it meant more in the SEC?
That's a convenient message given the results this year. I have a feeling that SEC fans would be crowing if it were the other way around. Oh, by the way, some of these results happened in playoff games and bowl games like the Orange Bowl. I thought it meant more in the SEC?
Posted on 1/3/26 at 11:51 am to Ptins944
Move bowl games to beginning of season and give me the records.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 11:57 am to D3Fan
quote:
That's a convenient message given the results this year. I have a feeling that SEC fans would be crowing if it were the other way around. Oh, by the way, some of these results happened in playoff games and bowl games like the Orange Bowl. I thought it meant more in the SEC?
Like I said, the losses in the playoffs are legit. Outside of that, they mean very little considering the prevalence of opt-outs in bowl games these days. I obviously have no dog in the fight because my team's too crappy to even be in the Toilet Bowl. But to use meaningless bowl games as a measuring stick win or lose is ridiculous in today's game.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 12:07 pm to PineyWoodsHog
I do not know why everyone cannot see that the current SEC (last 2-3 seasons) is NOT what we were in the earlier two decades of the 21st century. We are NOT the top conference in producing championship contenders, the Big10 is now. Will that continue, time will tell.
This post was edited on 1/3/26 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 1/3/26 at 12:08 pm to PineyWoodsHog
quote:
Outside of the playoffs, bowl games mean absolutely shite. They are certainly not a good measure of conference vs conference strength
Not only that, but the SEC is often screwed by the matchups having to face higher ranked teams.
Bowls:
W - #13 Texas (SEC #5) 41 vs #18 Michigan (Big 10 #4) 27
L - #23 Iowa (Big 10 #6) 34 vs #14 Vanderbilt (SEC #7) 27
L - #19 UVA (ACC #2) 13 vs Mizzou (SEC #8) 7
L - Illinois (Big 10 #7) 30 vs Tennessee (SEC #9) 28
L - #21 Houston 38 (Big 12 #4) vs LSU (SEC #10) 35
L - Wake Forest (ACC #11) 43 vs MSU (SEC #14) 29
Playoffs:
W/L - #6 Ole Miss (SEC #3) 39 vs #3 UGA (SEC Champ) 34
L - #1 Indiana (Big 10 #1) 38 vs #9 Bama (SEC #2) 3
W/L - #9 Bama (SEC #2) 34 @ #8 OU (SEC #6) 24
W - #6 Ole Miss (SEC #3) 41 vs #20 Tulane (AAC Champ) 10
L - #10 Miami 10 (ACC #3) @ #7 A&M (SEC #4) 3
Posted on 1/3/26 at 12:13 pm to GeorgeWest
quote:
I do not know why everyone cannot see that the current SEC (last 2-3 seasons) is NOT what we were in the earlier two decades of the 21st century.
Oh, I'm not arguing that at all. There is definitely more parity across the board. Meaningless bowls are still meaningless though, in regard to measuring conference strength.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 12:22 pm to wadewilson
quote:
Bowl Recordsby wadewilson
That does not say what you think it says, because 2 of the losses are also sec vs sec.
Okay. That makes sense.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 12:43 pm to hookem2522
You either play for the name on the front of your jersey, or you don't.
Miss State played hard last night, til the final whistle. The Wake QB lowered his shoulder to take on 3 tacklers, and getting the 1st down was a thing of beauty. That was I watched til the end of the game. Both teams played hard; one won and one lost.
Don't trivialize the game because some choose to mail it in.
Miss State played hard last night, til the final whistle. The Wake QB lowered his shoulder to take on 3 tacklers, and getting the 1st down was a thing of beauty. That was I watched til the end of the game. Both teams played hard; one won and one lost.
Don't trivialize the game because some choose to mail it in.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News