Started By
Message
The Georgia Dynasty is officially over
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:25 pm
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:25 pm
After failing to reach the title game the past two seasons, it was pretty much over already… but had Georgia come back this season to win their 3rd in five seasons it would have proven the dynasty wasn’t dead.
It’s now officially dead… if there is even such a thing as a two-year dynasty.
It’s now officially dead… if there is even such a thing as a two-year dynasty.
17
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:26 pm to AUTiger789
Bama and Georgia dynasties are done. Feels great.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:26 pm to AUTiger789
2 Titles does not equal a dynasty.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:29 pm to AUTiger789
You gotta win 3 titles in a relatively short amount of time to be a dynasty, right? I've never considered us such, not yet, anyway.
I like our chances going forward, though. We got beat by a better team and a great QB tonight.
I like our chances going forward, though. We got beat by a better team and a great QB tonight.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:30 pm to playmakers in space
Georgia was never a dynasty to begin with. People really are losing IQ these days.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:30 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
Auburn fans are ruined
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:31 pm to AUTiger789
It was never a true dynasty.
They had a good 2 year run.
They had a good 2 year run.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:31 pm to AUTiger789
Tough to complain about 2 back to back SEC Championships. It's hard to win a natty & Ole Miss outplayed us tonight.
We'll still kick Auburn's arse next season
We'll still kick Auburn's arse next season
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:32 pm to AUTiger789
We never had a dynasty. We do have one over Auburn though
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:33 pm to AUTiger789
The days of the same team winning the national championship a bunch in a short period is over in the 12 team playoff era. It's likely gonna expand and get even harder.
The big programs will still get them but way more spread out and way more non traditional teams mixed in as well
The big programs will still get them but way more spread out and way more non traditional teams mixed in as well
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:34 pm to armtackledawg
After watching Georgia lose the way they did tonight, you guys probably brought them back from the dead.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:34 pm to AUTiger789
Yet what programs wouldn’t trade spots with Georgia right now?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:35 pm to AUTiger789
I watched Saban win 3 out of 4.
4 out of 7.
5 out of 9. I consider the end of the dynasty after 2017.
6 out of 12.
That’s a dynasty. If Georgia claims a dynasty after a 3-4 year span without one. Lame.
4 out of 7.
5 out of 9. I consider the end of the dynasty after 2017.
6 out of 12.
That’s a dynasty. If Georgia claims a dynasty after a 3-4 year span without one. Lame.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:35 pm to StansberryRules
Agree, it will look more like basketball. Duke has been the dominant program and has like 5 in the last 30 years
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:36 pm to Gings5
Indiana, Miami, Ole Miss, Oregon
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:37 pm to AUTiger789
What's the opposite of a dynasty? That's where Auburn is right now.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:37 pm to AUTiger789
Dynasty?
They were losing to Vandy regularly in recent memory. And not the good Vandy of late.
They were losing to Vandy regularly in recent memory. And not the good Vandy of late.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:38 pm to armtackledawg
Exactly, the bigger the tournament the more it makes it extremely difficult to navigate.
Playing 4 single elimination games in a row against legit top 10 teams is not something anybody is gonna be able to do year in and out
Playing 4 single elimination games in a row against legit top 10 teams is not something anybody is gonna be able to do year in and out
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:39 pm to MacMan10
Ehhh. Georgia is having a historic run and has been the most consistent football program over the past 5 years.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:39 pm to playmakers in space
quote:
You gotta win 3 titles in a relatively short amount of time to be a dynasty, right? I've never considered us such, not yet, anyway.
I like our chances going forward, though. We got beat by a better team and a great QB tonight.
Yep, this was really about the last year Georgia had to make it happen, and even then it was really on the weaker end. But I would have considered it one still. I think you really need 3 in 4 years to get one started, but 3 in 5 is still a decent argument since you're above 50% in terms of national championships per year.
IMO, Alabama's dynasty was from 2009-2020, although we had a chance to extend it for a few years beyond 2020 and failed.
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 11:40 pm
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News