Started By
Message
Targeting?? Wow - can’t even hit with shoulder pads anymore
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:43 pm
The pussification of the game is out of control - what a dog shite call
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 8:44 pm
8
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:43 pm to dcbl
“Defenseless player” and hit him above the shoulders.
Dumb as frick rule, but it was called right. Abolish it.
Dumb as frick rule, but it was called right. Abolish it.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:44 pm to dcbl
Definitely not targeting
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:44 pm to dcbl
Terrible. Cant hit anymore
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:44 pm to dcbl
That’s about as obvious as targeting as you’ll ever get.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:44 pm to CNB
How was he still defenseless. He caught the ball and was running with it. He's a runner at that point. Another terrible interpretation of the rule.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:44 pm to dcbl
It was called correctly.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:45 pm to dcbl
First time?
I'm ending the remaining time of my life as only a baseball fan and college basketball fan
I'm ending the remaining time of my life as only a baseball fan and college basketball fan
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:47 pm to dcbl
I don’t think he was defenseless- he had turned upfield.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:47 pm to CNB
What was he supposed to do dive out of his way?
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 8:48 pm
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:48 pm to Buryl
quote:
That’s about as obvious as targeting as you’ll ever get.
No kidding. Defenseless player being dragged down from behind gets clocked right in the face mask by another defender. Easy call. The right call.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:49 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:
What was he supposed to do five out of his way?
Yeah how the frick do you make a tackle there? He's low and you're in position. Maybe let him run through you and hope he trips?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:49 pm to mtntiger
The hit on Gunner was more targeting than that was.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:49 pm to Dawgfanman
I agree completely with you
The rule is dumb as frick and no way he should still be considered defenseless there. But he was, and that’s why it was called.
And we wonder why we get arm tackles or strip attempts instead of laying wood. Defenders are scared to defend, for good reason.
The rule is dumb as frick and no way he should still be considered defenseless there. But he was, and that’s why it was called.
And we wonder why we get arm tackles or strip attempts instead of laying wood. Defenders are scared to defend, for good reason.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:49 pm to mtntiger
Called correctly.
Looked worse than it was.
Does the UGA player have to miss the next game?
Looked worse than it was.
Does the UGA player have to miss the next game?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:50 pm to navy
No just the rest of the game
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:50 pm to navy
No just this game
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:50 pm to navy
No he will not. As it happened in the first half he will sit the remainder of this game. Should Georgia win and advance he is good to go next game.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:52 pm to Buryl
bullshite call.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News