Started By
Message

SC vs Clemson: Interception or no?

Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:45 pm
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
32181 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:45 pm
Did SC get screwed on this play or no?

UV Int
DV no int



For those that care, here's the rule:

quote:

NCAA rules section 4 article 3c.

If a player has control of the ball, a slight movement of the ball, even if it touches the ground, will not be considered loss of possession; he must lose control of the ball in order for there to be a loss of possession.
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 7:47 pm
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
101502 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:45 pm to
Doesn't matter; lost
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
32181 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

Doesn't matter; lost


I know. That's why I waited so many days to post it. Stil want to know the consensus opinion or if I'm watching it with garnet colored glasses.
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 7:48 pm
Posted by GamecockUltimate
Columbia,SC
Member since Feb 2019
9162 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

Doesn't matter; lost


obviously, but there were 3 pretty big calls/no calls in that game. After the INT they didn't matter, but when it was just a 7 point game they did.

The no call on the facemask on third down.

That INT when we were in FG position.

the awful PI call against us.
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
13609 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:48 pm to
That's an interception every day and twice on Sundays.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
101502 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:48 pm to
Was the roughing the kicker call as terrible as it looked live/jumbotron replay?
Posted by GamecockUltimate
Columbia,SC
Member since Feb 2019
9162 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

Was the roughing the kicker call as terrible as it looked live/jumbotron replay?


It was a roughing. We didnt come close to blocking the punt. The punter just shanked it, and we landed under the kicker.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
32181 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

That's an interception every day and twice on Sundays.



Watch again from this time stamp.

This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 7:52 pm
Posted by GamecockUltimate
Columbia,SC
Member since Feb 2019
9162 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:49 pm to
quote:


That's an interception every day and twice on Sundays.


how? The ball moves significantly when he hits the ground
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
101502 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:49 pm to
Fair enough
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
41971 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:50 pm to
Too late now ... it's over.

No more ifs, ands, or butts.

Posted by GamecockUltimate
Columbia,SC
Member since Feb 2019
9162 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:51 pm to
quote:


Fair enough


yeah at first I thought we got a hand on it. Sadly we didnt. I guess had we blocked it, its a great call but that was one time I thought Shane made a terrible coaching decision and it also cost us 3 points.

We had a little momentum, take the ball and let your offense go to work.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
101502 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:51 pm to
Everything we saw in person looked like the punter just fell down

I assume a much better replay was shown on TV than we got
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
41971 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

obviously, but there were 3 pretty big calls/no calls in that game. After the INT they didn't matter, but when it was just a 7 point game they did.

The no call on the facemask on third down.

That INT when we were in FG position.

the awful PI call against us.

The officiating in the game was definitely atrocious ... SEC level bad.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
36872 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:52 pm to
It's not an interception. I was all but ready to say interception until it the view at 1:19 shows the ball hitting the ground and moving before he had possession.

You got screwed.
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
4181 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:53 pm to
I mean it's not crystal clear, certainly not worth getting upset about. Sort of a standard hohum close call.
Posted by Dawgs2122
Member since Dec 2024
1512 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:54 pm to
DANGED OLE' REFS BROTHA
Posted by bamabaseballsec
Member since Dec 2020
3262 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:58 pm to
Yeah but it was called an interception and you can’t see his hand clearly enough to see but it looks like his hand is under the middle of the ball cradled even if the ground wobbles it. Short version I don’t think there’s clear overturn a call evidence.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
32181 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Everything we saw in person looked like the punter just fell down



Our guy was blocked into the kicker.

Posted by theballguy
to Tibet you Bastard
Member since Oct 2011
29358 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 7:59 pm to
What did the refs call?
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter