Started By
Message

re: Honest discussion about NIL. Would love to hear thoughts.

Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:39 am to
Posted by Gunga Din
Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2020
1557 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:39 am to
quote:

NIL should only come from any legit business opportunity that uses their name, like, and image.



This was the way it was presented to the public.

Nobody was told that there would be "collectives"...

Nobody was told that guys basketball transfers would be lending their "name, image and likeness" to the owner of the Dallas Cowboys.

It was presented like this was going to be players and local businesses finding each other and having the player do a photo op eating the proprietor's chicken wings. Or the player doing t shirts.

Basically we got legalized and organized boosters bribing these guys.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
23035 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:53 am to
quote:


Nobody was told that there would be "collectives"...


bullshite, I warned of collectives for years before the NIL. I didn't call them "collectives" but I described the entire process 100% and said what would happen.

And it's not like I'm someone who can see into the future, it was just that fricking obvious.

quote:


Nobody was told that guys basketball transfers would be lending their "name, image and likeness" to the owner of the Dallas Cowboys.


Once again, the frick they weren't. Warned over and over, and the only thing people would say in response was "You're just scared of people getting paid and you'll lose your advantage" rather than acknowledging or addressing the obvious.

quote:

It was presented like this was going to be players and local businesses finding each other and having the player do a photo op eating the proprietor's chicken wings. Or the player doing t shirts.

Basically we got legalized and organized boosters bribing these guys.


Like I said, 100% predictable and it doesn't take a fortune teller to know it.

Don't tell me people weren't warned. Everyone just choose to ignore the warnings and dismissed those who tried to warn for whatever reasons.

And I wish this was only true for college sports. But the reality is, everything that happens in the world people were warned about and they choose to ignore the warnings and still do.

The consequences of a society that only learns what to think, not how to think.
This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 10:54 am
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30319 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:55 am to
quote:

This was the way it was presented to the public.

Nobody was told that there would be "collectives"...

Nobody was told that guys basketball transfers would be lending their "name, image and likeness" to the owner of the Dallas Cowboys.

It was presented like this was going to be players and local businesses finding each other and having the player do a photo op eating the proprietor's chicken wings. Or the player doing t shirts.

Basically we got legalized and organized boosters bribing these guys.
The SCOTUS didn't tell the public anything, they simply made a ruling. Contrary to popular belief, the public are pretty smart folks, even brilliant in many aspects and very industrious. The public saw the potential for this thing to blow like a volcano.

The NCAA on the other hand had every opportunity to reign things in by placing stern restrictions on the transfer portal, they failed to do so. Now we have unregulated pay-for-play through NIL collectives AND an unrestricted transfer portal.
Posted by TouchdownTony
Central Alabama
Member since Apr 2016
9806 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

This was the way it was presented to the public.

Nobody was told that there would be "collectives"...

Nobody was told that guys basketball transfers would be lending their "name, image and likeness" to the owner of the Dallas Cowboys.



What's everybody whining about. A month ago we were told it's just Saban whining. Remember?

The truth is, Saban tried to warn everyone. Honestly, anybody with half a brain knew what was going to happen but pea brained individuals thought it better to rip Saban instead of getting behind his actions. The narrative around the county (especially on this site) was, oh Bama just doesn't want to lose their advantage so don't bitch and complain now. Everyone obviously got what they wanted. Again, stop whining.
Posted by CharlotteSooner
Member since Mar 2016
11221 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Nobody was told that there would be "collectives"...


*ahem*

Pretty sure some teams in this league already had "collectives" before NIL.

I'm just sayin...
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 5:24 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter