Started By
Message

Is Anyone Gonna Talk About This?
Posted on 1/2/24 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 1/2/24 at 4:53 pm
McElroy: 1 natty.
McArron: 2 natties
Coker: 1 natty
Tua: 1 natty*
Jones: 1 natty
Sims: 0
Hurts: 0*
Young: 0
Milroe: 0
I mean... I'm not suggesting we go all Calvin Candie on this issue ... but ... we gonna ignore it?
McArron: 2 natties
Coker: 1 natty
Tua: 1 natty*
Jones: 1 natty
Sims: 0
Hurts: 0*
Young: 0
Milroe: 0
I mean... I'm not suggesting we go all Calvin Candie on this issue ... but ... we gonna ignore it?
Posted on 1/2/24 at 4:57 pm to geauxnavybeatbama
quote:
what are you suggesting
That the decline is real this time.
Posted on 1/2/24 at 4:59 pm to Bubdylan
Must be a Bama thing. or a conincidence.
Tee Martin, Jameis Winston, and Stetquavious Bennett didn't have any problems.
Tee Martin, Jameis Winston, and Stetquavious Bennett didn't have any problems.
Posted on 1/2/24 at 4:59 pm to geauxnavybeatbama
Just that it's remarkable.
Is it a failure of the system?
Is it just a small sample size?
If it doesn't even raise an eyebrow, I dunno ... seems odd.
Is it a failure of the system?
Is it just a small sample size?
If it doesn't even raise an eyebrow, I dunno ... seems odd.
Posted on 1/2/24 at 4:59 pm to Bubdylan
quote:
Coker: 1 natty
Proof that Florida State backups can win a national title.
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:01 pm to Bubdylan
What’s the o/u on bans in this thread?
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:03 pm to killedbyindians
I would really like it if it led to nothing banworthy. Maybe that's naive.
Look, part of me hates that I even noticed it. But I did. And so ... is there anything to it?
Look, part of me hates that I even noticed it. But I did. And so ... is there anything to it?
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:06 pm to Bubdylan
Is Cam considered black or did they lose him in the Racial Draft to the LGBT's?
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:07 pm to Bubdylan
I’d prefer someone find out if a Michigan booster paid the Alabama center to throw the game. That shite was to weird.
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:09 pm to Bubdylan
quote:since you put that asterisk there, you clearly understand it's disingenuous to put him on the list. he did win one
Hurts: 0*
quote:What Sims did is about as impressive as anybody on the list
Sims: 0
quote:isn't he freshman?
Milroe: 0
quote:Tua is the only one on the list who wouldn't immediately trade everything to be in young's place
Young: 0
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:14 pm to Bubdylan
Are we talking about actual championships or claimed championships? Tua does not have an actual championship, for some stupid reason they still claim 2020 even though it didn’t count towards anyone’s eligibility and teams were experimenting with cardboard cutouts and chick kickers.
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:14 pm to faraway
Not totally disingenuous, but you are right that I felt a twinge on this point.
However, there was no chance at that trophy without Tua taking over.
So while the waters are murkier there, with 100% of the data flowing in one direction, I think it's a fair inclusion ... with an asterisk.
However, there was no chance at that trophy without Tua taking over.
So while the waters are murkier there, with 100% of the data flowing in one direction, I think it's a fair inclusion ... with an asterisk.
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:15 pm to Bubdylan
quote:
is there anything to it?
Yes it means you’re terribly racist for noticing. I’m kidding I’d say it ignores too many other variables ie coaching, play calling, other weapons, o-line, opponent strengths etc. and way too small of a sample size.
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:16 pm to Bubdylan
All I get out of this is Bama has won a bunch of natties
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:20 pm to Dingbag
quote:
Tua does not have an actual championship, for some stupid reason they still claim 2020
Watch a lot of football, do ya?
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:20 pm to Dingbag
Go by Bryant Museum and count the trophies won during the Saban era.
Bet you will find one with National Championship 2020.
Bet you will find one with National Championship 2020.
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:22 pm to killedbyindians
If it's too small of a sample size, then I'm satisfied with that answer.
I don't know the standard on sample sizes before a little phenomenon like this becomes significant.
100% across 9 QBs seemed like enough to at least say it out loud.
But hey, if 9 outta 9 is still too slim, I can accept that.
I don't know the standard on sample sizes before a little phenomenon like this becomes significant.
100% across 9 QBs seemed like enough to at least say it out loud.
But hey, if 9 outta 9 is still too slim, I can accept that.
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:25 pm to Bubdylan
quote:
McElroy: 1 natty.
McArron: 2 natties
Coker: 1 natty
Tua: 1 natty*
Jones: 1 natty
Sims: 0
Hurts: 0*
Young: 0
Milroe: 0
Tua could easily pass as a brutha
Popular
Back to top
