Started By
Message
Best vs deserved
Posted on 12/7/23 at 1:32 am
Posted on 12/7/23 at 1:32 am
Do people not understand that the committee uses a combination of best and deserved to pick the “best” 4 teams. It’s not best vs deserved, it’s a combination of both. You had 5 conference champions this year all with 1 loss or undefeated. 5 teams that earned it on the field so the committee picked what they felt were the best 4 out of those 5 deserving teams. Sure Georgia is probably one of the best 4 teams, but they didn’t meet the threshold of deserving this year without having that conference championship like the other 5 teams. The only question was FSU vs Alabama and they felt Alabama was better. And the injury to Jordan Travis gave them an easy out to put in Alabama.
9
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:16 am to tigereye1988
Yawn
Posted on 12/7/23 at 4:24 am to tigereye1988
Best vs Most Deserved
“Best”
1. Michigan
2. Texas
3. Bama
4. UGA
5. Washington
6. Ohio State
7. FSU
“Most Deserving”
1. Michigan
2. Washington
3. FSU
4. Texas
5. Bama
6. UGA
7. Ohio St
“Best”
1. Michigan
2. Texas
3. Bama
4. UGA
5. Washington
6. Ohio State
7. FSU
“Most Deserving”
1. Michigan
2. Washington
3. FSU
4. Texas
5. Bama
6. UGA
7. Ohio St
Posted on 12/7/23 at 8:02 am to tigereye1988
quote:
The only question was FSU vs Alabama and they felt Alabama was better.
What about FSU vs Texas, another one loss conference champion?
I've heard people say that the committee couldn't put Bama in over Texas, but after this year, I think the committee can do whatever it wants.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 8:16 am to Hot_in_the_box
quote:
“Most Deserving”
quote:
3. FSU
By this logic, #4 most deserving was Liberty.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 8:18 am to tigereye1988
Sorry, sir, 24-hour Outrage Mob has moved on. No one cares anymore.
This post was edited on 12/7/23 at 8:20 am
Posted on 12/7/23 at 8:27 am to tigereye1988
Can we stop with this already?
It’s getting old.
It’s getting old.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 8:30 am to tigereye1988
quote:
And the injury to Jordan Travis
I remember a starting qb about five years ago who led his team to a 13-0 deficit after the first half, who was then replaced by the second string qb for the second half and this second-stringer eventually won the national championship.
Second string qbs can win ball games you know.
This post was edited on 12/7/23 at 8:35 am
Posted on 12/7/23 at 8:33 am to Toroballistic
quote:
I've heard people say that the committee couldn't put Bama in over Texas, but after this year, I think the committee can do whatever it wants.
Yeah see with Texas and Bama…Bama’s loss was better than Texas’s loss and their top win is arguably equal or better, so there’s an argument which could be made between both Texas and Bama as well if someone was discerning beyond “head to head”.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 8:48 am to Homesick Tiger
Of course backup QBs can when big games. Sometimes the backup even turns out to be better than the starter like Tom Brady. But we remember those moments because they are not the norm. I think things would have turned out differently if FSUs backups went out there and lit it up but they didn’t.
This post was edited on 12/7/23 at 11:55 am
Posted on 12/7/23 at 9:37 am to The Quiet One
quote:
Sorry, sir, 24-hour Outrage Mob has moved on. No one cares anymore.
Sorry, but 24 hour melt isn't near long enough for some LSU fans! This melt will be going on for closer to 24 years than 24 hours.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 9:52 am to tigereye1988
Instead of trying to come up with different adjectives and perspectives on the CFP committee, I don't understand why people on here just look at trends instead. The CFP Committe has been around for 10 frigging years now. After a while trends emerge. That's why I knew Georgia had no shot after the SECCG.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 10:04 am to Toroballistic
quote:
What about FSU vs Texas, another one loss conference champion?
What about fsu vs M??? Another undefeated, but with arguably an equally shitty schedule, AANNNDDDD, they're frickin cheaters.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 10:05 am to tigereye1988
quote:
Do people not understand that the committee uses a combination of best and deserved to pick the “best” 4 teams.
Well Florida St. Was both so.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 10:07 am to GBJs
Enjoy your undeserved playoff birth bitch.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 10:14 am to tigereye1988
and enjoy the upvotePosted on 12/7/23 at 10:21 am to mattchewbocca
quote:THANKS! We will.
Enjoy your undeserved playoff birth bitch.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 10:26 am to mattchewbocca
quote:
Well Florida St. Was both so.
Their SOS says otherwise. Their top win says otherwise.
I can keep going if you'd like.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 10:52 am to Centinel
quote:
Their SOS says otherwise. Their top win says otherwise.
This bama team lost by double digits to Texas at home. Barely beat an OOC team with a horrible record. Should have lost to a very bad auburn team. And beat Georgia barely by 3 pts. The game was aweful on both sides. Florida state hasn’t lost a game and won their last 2 important games, one with their backup and one with the freshman 3rd string. Go frick you’re if you say they don’t deserve to be in it over a very underrated bama team that has no business stiffing the playoffs. So go frick yourself or your cousin. It doesn’t matter to me.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 10:55 am to Toroballistic
Texas wasn't ranked 4th. That was Alabama. Thus Alabama was the reason FSU got left out.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News