Started By
Message
re: TCU 51 @ Michigan 45 Final - ESPN
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:06 pm to CarolinaGamecock99
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:06 pm to CarolinaGamecock99
Harbaugh clock Mgt fricked Michigan
2
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:07 pm to hoojy
quote:
TCU got lucky on that.
They got lucky that UGA's game was scheduled. They took no time on that review. TV scheduling and a long game saved their bacon.
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:07 pm to GreenPolo
That’s the same crew that called the TSIO. Targeting has to be blatant.
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:07 pm to GreenPolo
Correct call - no targeting
Michigan got a lot of questionable calls down the stretch
Congrats Frogs!
Michigan got a lot of questionable calls down the stretch
Congrats Frogs!
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:07 pm to LSURulzSEC
Matt Austin even said it was targeting but ok. Can we just get rid of this rule already?
This post was edited on 12/31/22 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:07 pm to GreenPolo
TCU in the NCG...
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:07 pm to Inadvertent Whistle
quote:
That was more targeting than the one that got called on us against Kansas.
Thought that got reversed.
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:08 pm to LSURulzSEC
Molly is a goddess. Mercy
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:08 pm to Rhino5
say what you want about the two teams, but that was a great freaking game
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:08 pm to Ancient Astronaut
That was a helluva ball game. F*CK Michigan
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:08 pm to hoojy
Who is the blonde doing the interview???
Holy shite she is spicy
Holy shite she is spicy
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:08 pm to WestRockyTop
Do not frick with the hypno toad thing
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:08 pm to MartyMoose09
They review them all the time without a flag. The call comes from the booth and that was 100% targeting.
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:08 pm to BHTiger
Would love to see Mollys starfish
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:09 pm to LSURulzSEC
It’s football. Michigan begging.
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:09 pm to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
Matt Austin even said it was targeting but ok. Can we just get rid of this rule already?
When the rules expert says that the touchdown was a touchdown and the targeting was targeting and neither of them go that way, some questions have to be raised
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:09 pm to MugMan
quote:
Everyone saying targeting...he hit his back, not head
Didn't need to be called to extend the game or affect the next one as it was not egregious, but targeting by rule is contact with the crown of helmet to the head or neck area in college. In that he hit him square in the base of the neck/upper shoulders, it would meet the rules.
This post was edited on 12/31/22 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:10 pm to BigBro
quote:
say what you want about the two teams, but that was a great freaking game
Up there with
Tex USC
Bama Ala 2017
Bama Clem 2016
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:10 pm to Che Boludo
He lead with crown of his helmet. It was a targeting.
Posted on 12/31/22 at 7:10 pm to Terrific Tales
quote:
When the rules expert says that the touchdown was a touchdown and the targeting was targeting and neither of them go that way, some questions have to be raised
Right.
When there’s so much grey area that it’s always up for debate and interpretation, something needs to be done
Page 53 of 54
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News