Started By
Message
Two most successful teams in the SEC the past decade?
Posted on 10/22/08 at 9:31 am
Posted on 10/22/08 at 9:31 am
LSU and Florida or LSU and Georgia? Has to be LSU and Florida right?
7
Posted on 10/22/08 at 9:33 am to Palm Beach Tiger
What's your criteria for 'successful'?
Posted on 10/22/08 at 9:34 am to ToplessTenors4evuh
SEC championships, National Championships, BCS appearances, SEC championship game appearances. I think Florida has them beat in most of those catagories. 
Posted on 10/22/08 at 9:40 am to Palm Beach Tiger
If you ask this on the SEC rant you will get nothing but Bama answers
Posted on 10/22/08 at 9:44 am to AuburnCPA
I'm not much of a fan of that board. Just saw the article proclaiming UGA and LSU as the 2 most successfull teams over the past decade and found it odd. Hell IMO Tennessee might have more of a bid for that then UGA does.
Posted on 10/22/08 at 10:42 am to Palm Beach Tiger
yea saw that too.
fla is def been more successful than georgia
fla is def been more successful than georgia
Posted on 10/22/08 at 10:47 am to Palm Beach Tiger
Florida's One National Championship pretty much trumps anything that Georgia can bring to the party.
Posted on 10/22/08 at 10:51 am to Roughneck
i think he had to be basing it off of W/L..
Posted on 10/22/08 at 10:58 am to Xenophon
Well that's all well and good but, given the option between a better W/L% or a National Championship, I know which one I'm picking.
Posted on 10/22/08 at 11:09 am to Palm Beach Tiger
quote:
Has to be LSU and Florida right?
Probably could be said out of the 3 major sports and not just football.
Posted on 10/22/08 at 11:09 am to Roughneck
absolutely.. but that wouldnt fit the article he is writing..
Posted on 10/22/08 at 12:41 pm to Palm Beach Tiger
Here's how the College Football Data Warehouse ranks Div 1A teams for the period from 2000 - 2007:
Posted on 10/22/08 at 12:51 pm to Roughneck
if you're going back to 2000, Georgia and LSU, Georgia has a better record than Florida and has won the SEC as many times. Florida may have won the MNC but UGA had a 13-1 year as well in 02 you can't say for sure 06 UF was better
This post was edited on 10/22/08 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 10/22/08 at 1:09 pm to Esarhaddon
quote:
Florida may have won the MNC but UGA had a 13-1 year as well in 02
Posted on 10/22/08 at 3:09 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
Probably could be said out of the 3 major sports and not just football.
no...ill take uga and lsu in baseball and florida and kentucky/tennessee in basketball, but will stick with the agreed opinion of lsu-uf in football (uga 3rd fwiw).
Posted on 10/22/08 at 3:42 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
LSU by far # 1
Georgia has been good but Fla's 1 national champship is greater.
Georgia has been good but Fla's 1 national champship is greater.
Posted on 10/22/08 at 3:45 pm to SPEEDY
Georgia was 13-1 in 2002, the same record LSU had in 03 and UFAG in 06, they just were unfortunate as there were two undefeated teams ahead of themPosted on 10/22/08 at 3:56 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
no...ill take uga and lsu in baseball and florida and kentucky/tennessee in basketball, but will stick with the agreed opinion of lsu-uf in football (uga 3rd fwiw).
i meant combined success.
Posted on 10/22/08 at 7:26 pm to blueridgeTiger
2 huge problems with those rankings.
1.Look how much harder USC's schedule is compared to everyone else. No way in hell that's even close.
2.Why are LSU and USC even on championships?
Posted on 10/22/08 at 7:31 pm to blueridgeTiger
On the points chart, I believe LSU should have 100 national championship points and USC 50, not 100. They only have one crystal ball.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News