Started By
Message
re: Portal Extravaganza - Scraped up some money edition
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:46 pm to jangalang
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:46 pm to jangalang
I have no dog in this fight. Whether Chaplin is good or not, I have no idea.
But I would trust PFF over the Auburn website. The team websites always gives the most positive spin to their players because it makes sense to do that. They cherry pick the best things they can say about the player because you can’t just be dogging your own guys on the website.
It’s like when we list heights and weights and then guys go to the pro combines and shrink.
But I would trust PFF over the Auburn website. The team websites always gives the most positive spin to their players because it makes sense to do that. They cherry pick the best things they can say about the player because you can’t just be dogging your own guys on the website.
It’s like when we list heights and weights and then guys go to the pro combines and shrink.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 1:50 pm
3
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:47 pm to auyushu
quote:
Yeah, those are some ridiculously bad run blocking grades.
Sadly, not even the worst. A couple of our guys had sub 14's for the A&M game.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:49 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
No need. Because my source lives on.
That was just proof there is a gulf in subjectivity in anyone's metrics they pay for versus another.
AuburnTigers.Com wins again...unless you're a bammer. Or something
That was just proof there is a gulf in subjectivity in anyone's metrics they pay for versus another.
AuburnTigers.Com wins again...unless you're a bammer. Or something
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:50 pm to jangalang
quote:
If you listen to what I am saying it was the coaching that was fricked.
I mean, if you call what we had this year coaching.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:50 pm to Weagle25
quote:
he team websites always gives the most positive spin
They'd never
. What year was it we released the winter workout 40 times or something and basically ever DB and WR was sub 4.4? Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:51 pm to jangalang
quote:
highly doubt Chaplin had a real 22 run grade against Mercer.
Wtf Jang, did you just try and quote a source to support your argument, and then deny that same sources accuracy a couple posts later?
That's some Chex level weathervane spinning around stuff.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:51 pm to Weagle25
Anyone have thoughts on Johntay Cook? 247 just posted an article about him.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:52 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
You are not accusing our site of spin. More like outright lying saying there is no way he graded in the 90s five times.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:55 pm to jangalang
quote:
You are not accusing our site of spin. More like outright lying saying there is no way he graded in the 90s five times.
Actually I said this, sorry:
quote:
the Auburn metric seems to be flawed regardless
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:56 pm to auyushu
quote:
Wtf Jang, did you just try and quote a source to support your argument, and then deny that same sources accuracy a couple posts later?
Not AuburnTigers.com. Not my source.
That quote was just a second organization illustrating against mcknbaj's stats proving his stats mean little unless you pay for them and hold your cash burn dear to your heaet
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:56 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:It's either spin or its flawed. Make up your mind.
the Auburn metric seems to be flawed regardless
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:59 pm to jangalang
I never once said that specific metric was spin. I said it was flawed.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:59 pm to jangalang
Btw. The whole team PFF report cards for all games (didn’t find Iron Bowl) are on War Rapports site for free. I didn’t pay anything.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:01 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
You implied those 90 grades with this
Since we are using advanced analytics. Let me see yall spin the advanced analytics for all the lower games of incoming upgrades.
quote:
They'd never
Since we are using advanced analytics. Let me see yall spin the advanced analytics for all the lower games of incoming upgrades.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:02 pm to mckibaj
quote:
Btw. The whole team PFF report cards for all games (didn’t find Iron Bowl) are on War Rapports site for free. I didn’t pay anything.
I dont believe you. I bet you have youtube premium and Paramount, too.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:04 pm to jangalang
quote:
You implied those 90 grades with this
Nope. That was in response to a general statement that team websites do positively spin things. If you disagree with that statement, then that's on you.
I specifically said the metric in question is flawed.
quote:
Let me see yall spin the advanced analytics for all the lower games
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:06 pm to jangalang
quote:
I bet you have youtube premium and Paramount, too.
Screw them YouTube Adds!
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:09 pm to mckibaj
quote:
(didn’t find Iron Bowl)
He actually had a solid Iron Bowl for him, using the PFSN stats. 80.9 overall impact, 83.2 pass grade, 27.7 run grade. 2nd highest performance of his for the season.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:11 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Nope. That was in response to a general statement that team websites do positively spin things. If you disagree with that statement, then that's on you.
Nah. Still on you because frick you and your title for one, and number two if they're even remotely inaccurate about him being graded that high for that many games then they are outright lying.
quote:
I specifically said the metric in question is flawed.
Your cognitive dissonance feeling a tingle?
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:11 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
27.7 run grade.
I don't really think FSU with Gus and Herb Hand was the best choice for him. He did fairly well with pass block grades. But what do I know? Maybe Herb Hand gets him playing well.
Page 251 of 255
Latest Auburn News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News