Is Marshall making bad reads, or are the reads becoming harder to make?

We were running much easier with a full box against Mizzou and UGA last year.

Yep and look at our OL. Losing Robinson and Kozan off the left side of the line is a game changer

Where were his bad reads tonight? If Williams catches that one and he puts the other two on the money to Coates that's about 170 more passing yards. Not to mention the number of drops.

On at least two of the tipped passes he made the right read and was throwing to an open receiver. Execution was the problem tonight.

ETA: If this was talking about the reads in the running game then yes he could have been better but they had pretty much everything covered. That's why our receivers were open most of the game.

Nick won this game.

quote:

---

So Marshall wasn't necessarily making bad reads, they were just selling out to make every read a "bad read". Similar-ish concept, then, I guess. Gotta get the passing game going to stop that shite.

---

This.

Their LBs never even thought about dropping into coverage. They were shooting gaps all night long.

And, I repeat, with the ZR Marshall isn't reading the LB's. He's reading the DE (or the DT depending on the blocking scheme called).

As many times as Gus bailed out EJ, he was due

quote:

---

We are talking read option runs not passing plays are we not?

---

That's my understanding.

We good then

quote:

---

We were running much easier with a full box against Mizzou and UGA last year.

---

Our OL was better last year. I said it here during the first game, and was severely chastised for it, but our OL needs to improve greatly. It also shows how much we miss Prosch.