Started By
Message
re: Buccees Mascot Coaching Edition (Former Jet Tracking)
Posted on 11/19/22 at 7:47 pm to Rhymenoceros
Posted on 11/19/22 at 7:47 pm to Rhymenoceros
I am in. Going to set up a page selling those tonight. You want a commission for the idea?
This post was edited on 11/19/22 at 7:48 pm
1
Posted on 11/19/22 at 11:54 pm to NC1406
I want Lanning over Kiffin. Don’t know why I’m being so Fickell after riding the Lane Train all week. I just have a feeling. Someone bring some reason here because I think it’s going to be Kiffin in the end
Posted on 11/20/22 at 12:24 am to kung fu kenny
Lanning is a huge risk. He is 1-2 vs teams with a pulse. Got lucky getting Bo if they didn’t they would’ve lost to UCLA and Washington State.
Don’t forget Cristobal recruited extremely well there.
Don’t forget Cristobal recruited extremely well there.
Posted on 11/20/22 at 12:24 am to kung fu kenny
I think the ones with the money will wait and think about it after tonight's game and back out after State beats him. He will be 8-4 at that point and really nothing to hang this season on. At that point his entire OM career will be beating a 4 loss Arkansas team last year and a bad Kentucky team this year.
This post was edited on 11/20/22 at 12:26 am
Posted on 11/20/22 at 12:36 am to Rabern57
You don’t back out after a bad game. There’s clear reasons as to why he might not have been prepared… he’s shown success before and paired with Auburn he would be able to build a really successful program.
Posted on 11/20/22 at 12:38 am to kung fu kenny
quote:
I want Lanning over Kiffin. Don’t know why I’m being so Fickell after riding the Lane Train all week. I just have a feeling. Someone bring some reason here because I think it’s going to be Kiffin in the end
In a 12 team playoff, portal, and NIL era you want Kiffin (and a great D-coordinator).
In the old school BCS or 4 team playoff you might give the edge to program builder/recruiter Lanning.
Posted on 11/20/22 at 12:43 am to AUcs13
quote:I've never been in. He's never worked out anywhere. He's in his 3rd year and still doesn't have his act together. He's has wins but not the type that will keep him employed by a top school. OM isn't going to fire him for losing to top teams as long as he win 8 to 10 games a year. That will not cut it at Auburn and that's all he has proven to be no matter where he's been.
You don’t back out after a bad game.
He's not going to change when he gets to Auburn and if he has to be told how he can coach (not to go for it at dumb times and he has to hire this DC and staff) and not make dumb calls then he's not a great coach.
When you make a splash hire, you hire someone you expect to come in and run the football program to an elite level without having to be bosses and controlled constantly. Especially with the figures they are throwing around.
This post was edited on 11/20/22 at 12:51 am
Posted on 11/20/22 at 12:51 am to Rabern57
I understand your point but let me just say I would be pleased with a few 10-win seasons in a row… haven’t had that kind of consistency since Dye
Posted on 11/20/22 at 1:08 am to kung fu kenny
quote:I would too but I want us to aim for someone that coaches up the whole team and doesn't make calls like he's playing a Playstation. Someone that I expect to last and not have us back here in 4 or 5 years. We have to play UGA and Bama every year. He just seems immature as a person and HC.
I understand your point but let me just say I would be pleased with a few 10-win seasons in a row… haven’t had that kind of consistency since Dye
I like Freeze because his entire team plays above their level more than not and he is an all around coach. Not just one-sided. Their teams against Arkansas shows the difference in styles and their coaching abilities. Plus Freeze can be gotten for cheaper with little to no buyout.
This post was edited on 11/20/22 at 1:09 am
Posted on 11/20/22 at 6:09 am to Rabern57
So how do you feel about OM's beat down...
Does it affect Lane's decision at all??
Does it change how much we are willing to pay?
Or is it a meaningless loss??
Does it affect Lane's decision at all??
Does it change how much we are willing to pay?
Or is it a meaningless loss??
Posted on 11/20/22 at 6:37 am to WarEaGAL
Meaningless loss. Remember he tried to keep tge DC who did much better and OM wouldn't pay him. Part of Lane's frustration there
Posted on 11/20/22 at 6:46 am to WarEaGAL
quote:
So how do you feel about OM's beat down.
Doesn't change my feelings. Arkansas could easily be a 9 win team if the ball bounced differently in a few games. Ole Miss goes on the road has 3 turnovers and a ton of distractions leading up to the game. Who cares.
Posted on 11/20/22 at 6:50 am to WarEaGAL
quote:
So how do you feel about OM's beat down...
Lane was distracted on the sidelines
You do realise they could have had 2 extra touchdowns if it weren't for penalties?
I don't think this game impacts anything though - coaches have bad games. I think we still go after him
Posted on 11/20/22 at 6:58 am to WarEaGAL
quote:
So how do you feel about OM's beat down...
Does it affect Lane's decision at all??
Does it change how much we are willing to pay?
Or is it a meaningless loss??
If Cohen was already set on him, I don't think it changes anything.
Posted on 11/20/22 at 7:02 am to HonorThyWarEagle
Let’s look back and remember the search two years ago. Steele, Christibal, Venables, Freeze, Kiffin, Napier, Bill Clark and the mystery candidate Harsin.
This year, Kiffin, Freeze, Fickell, Grimes, Dabo.
I still believe it is Lane, but I am hoping for a late change to Luke Fickell. The negative with him is he has not coached in the south, but he does recruit the south.
This year, Kiffin, Freeze, Fickell, Grimes, Dabo.
I still believe it is Lane, but I am hoping for a late change to Luke Fickell. The negative with him is he has not coached in the south, but he does recruit the south.
Posted on 11/20/22 at 7:15 am to WarEaGAL
quote:
So how do you feel about OM's beat down
They had 2 TDs called back 3 turnovers, and still ended up with 703 yards of total offense. The only thing that concerns me is the defense.
Posted on 11/20/22 at 7:19 am to aubiecat
Remember OM wouldn't pay his preferred DC so he left
I will take my chances with a guy who can put up those offensive numbers, it's been a long time for us
I will take my chances with a guy who can put up those offensive numbers, it's been a long time for us
This post was edited on 11/20/22 at 7:21 am
Posted on 11/20/22 at 7:42 am to aubiecat
Also something like 450+ yards rushing, in a loss. Give us lane!
Posted on 11/20/22 at 8:16 am to aubiecat
quote:Just means they had to break the rules to get them and didn't earn them. They committed the turnovers. Those were bad plays not free passes for anything. I'll take more points and less yards any day.
They had 2 TDs called back 3 turnovers, and still ended up with 703 yards of total offense.
I just hope Cohen is smart enough to see him for what he is and isn't setting up there making excuses to give him passes on all his flaws. If so none of this will matter. He won't be top 3 after the state game.
Posted on 11/20/22 at 8:21 am to Rabern57
Not taking up for Lane.
I honestly could care less if we hire him or not. I trust the new admins.
But did you watch the game? Refs need to be investigated (not just this game but all season. The shenanigans are way more than coincidence and I am beginning to wonder if Sankey condones this trash because nothing gets done about it.
I think gambling is way too embedded in how they call games.
I honestly could care less if we hire him or not. I trust the new admins.
But did you watch the game? Refs need to be investigated (not just this game but all season. The shenanigans are way more than coincidence and I am beginning to wonder if Sankey condones this trash because nothing gets done about it.
I think gambling is way too embedded in how they call games.
Page 313 of 542
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News