Started By
Message
re: Auburn, Alabama, require vaccination all employees.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:57 pm to Tigerman97
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:57 pm to Tigerman97
quote:
Both things you said are not correct. The vaccine reduces transmission rates which will always slow the spread.
Clearly you just can't read.
quote:
You might believe fully vaccinated people were driving the summer spike but all the data that exist states the transmission was driven in unvaccinated people.
I don't care either way. How about we stick to the things i'm actually talking about and discussing. Stay on topic please.
quote:
My hypothetical ideal must have felt familiar to you
No, you just apply generalities that have nothing to do to my post or what I am discussing.
This post was edited on 10/25/21 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:08 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
So you actually do support the federal mandate. Stop lying then
Not lying. I do realize the government has the power as they’ve always had for such a requirement.
Mostly, I just try to combat bad info when I have time. The talk of government overreach, etc is amusing to me.
The vitriol responses by people concerning this virus and this vaccine also come across as soft to me.
This post was edited on 10/25/21 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:12 pm to Tigerman97
quote:
Not lying. I do realize the government has the power as they’ve always had for such a requirement.
So you do support the vaccine mandate then? You can say yes, it is okay. Not sure why you felt the necessity to lie.
This post was edited on 10/25/21 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:14 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
So you do support the vaccine mandate then? You can say yes, it is okay. Not sure why you felt the necessity to lie.
Not sure how recognizing the power to do something means support. Feels like a simple mind could think of a 100 things where a person might recognize the power to do it but not support it.
Example: I recognized Hardin’s right to not push the team to vaccinate but did not support it.
This post was edited on 10/25/21 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:14 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
I've kind of wondered if Harsin is actually vaccinated just doesn't want to talk about it.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:15 pm to Tigerman97
quote:
Not sure how recognizing the power to do something means support
You don't know how saying "good policy" means you support the policy?
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:16 pm to GenesChin
quote:
I've kind of wondered if Harsin is actually vaccinated just doesn't want to talk about it.
I believe he has been for a very long time, and is also very adamant about keeping personal info and decisions personal, especially when it comes to his players.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:21 pm to Tigerman97
quote:Such a childish remark.
Stop being such a snowflake
quote:Corruption is OK in your book.
This is how America gets it done
quote:and power.
It's about the money
quote:whose money? The rich are getting richer and the middle and lower class are paying the price.
The Pandemic is bad for the money.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:25 pm to ChexMix
Don’t know if this is already in here as I’ve avoided almost all vaccine threads but saw this today.
We don’t actually know Harsin’s Vaccine status do we?
quote:
Harsin on Auburn University's new vaccine mandate: "I'm aware of the new policy. I appreciate you have to ask the question and understand it, but that doesn't change. The executive order, that doesn't change the fact I'm not going to discuss any individual's status"
We don’t actually know Harsin’s Vaccine status do we?
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:25 pm to ChexMix
quote:
The rich are getting richer and the middle and lower class are paying the price.
On this we can agree.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:27 pm to Tigerman97
quote:
Both things you said are not correct. The vaccine reduces transmission rates which will always slow the spread.
This statement is only true if you don't consider any other possible outcomes/scenarios:
#1: This is a "leaky" vaccine. It doesn't guarantee immunity and it doesn't prevent you from spreading the virus. This means that the vaccine presents the perfect environment for mutations to emerge because it gives the virus the perfect "training" environment to create new mutations. Viruses don't mutate unless they are stressed to do so - a leaky vaccine creates that environment. This was repeated ad nauseum by "experts" like Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche who repeatedly tried to explain how mass vaccination in the middle of a pandemic was a colossal mistake. And what do you know? You're seeing massive spikes in cases all around the world in places that are 90%+ vaccinated - clearly through variants that have adapted to slip past your vaccine-induced protection. Enabling mutations does NOT "slow the spread". And no, the unvaccinated are NOT creating mutations (why would a virus need to mutate in order to infect someone that hasn't been vaccinated?)
#2: The vaccine actually PROMOTES spread through an obvious social mechanism: because it is ineffective in actually eliminating the spread of the virus WHILE being fairly effective in terms of eliminating one's "serious symptoms" while infected, it creates a false sense of security and carelessness. A person who is unvaccinated and who gets COVID is likely to get "sick" to some degree. This means that they will rationally self-isolate - like people were doing for months long before any vaccine was available. On the other hand, someone who is double vaccinated can VERY easily be carrying the virus - but while being asymptomatic (because the vaccine "is working") or experiencing only mild symptoms. What does that person do? They go to work and the grocery store and interact with their friends and families as if everything was normal. But they're infectious. Do you comprehend how this is a problem? Do you perhaps see how this probably plays a significant role in all these areas where 90%+ are vaccinated, but magically the virus is still breaking out?
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:28 pm to Weagle25
quote:
We don’t actually know Harsin’s Vaccine status do we?
Negative. The question is a non-starter for him. He refuses to answer it either way.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:29 pm to metafour
quote:
This statement is only true if you don't consider any other possible outcomes/scenarios:
The statement isn't correct because I never said it doesn't reduce transmission or slow the spread. At any point.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:30 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Negative. The question is a non-starter for him. He refuses to answer it either way.
So I guess we find out in December whether we still have a coach
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
God that would suck. Have a coach seemingly improving the program only to have him terminated for this…
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:33 pm to Weagle25
quote:
So I guess we find out in December whether we still have a coach
God that would suck. Have a coach seemingly improving the program only to have him terminated for this…
Well, then to add onto that * if * they do update what fully vaxx'd means at some point in the future based on the need for boosters from what it being shown on the over 6 month efficacy of them, then the policy just goes out the window
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:45 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Who ordered a large pepperoni pizza?
Posted on 10/25/21 at 3:08 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Well, then to add onto that * if * they do update what fully vaxx'd means at some point in the future based on the need for boosters from what it being shown on the over 6 month efficacy of them, then the policy just goes out the window . New deadline or fired, and so on and so forth.
This is a very good point that will be problematic in the future. At the very least I suspect the 3rd shot would eventually be the "medical" standard for immune. (if that is possible) The data suggest that a 3rd shot is what it takes to move from Pandemic too Endemic at this point.
In time I also suspect the data to fully reveal infection plus some level of vaccination to be immune as well.
As both administrations have struggled with matching politics to science isn't an easy needle to thread.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 3:14 pm to GenesChin
quote:
I've kind of wondered if Harsin is actually vaccinated just doesn't want to talk about it.
He almost certainly is. If nothing else, he's having people talk about the program.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 3:19 pm to Weagle25
quote:
So I guess we find out in December whether we still have a coach
This is a complicated issue in a lot of ways, but honestly, if he won't take the shot, as required by his employer, he should probably leave. He could probably get another coaching gig, but not one as big as AU, at the moment.
I thought Nick Saban had a pretty good response to this (honestly like he does with most things). He brought in doctors, said it was a personal decision but also how it impacted the team and your potential ability to participate. Low and behold they hit 90% so there was no additional testing at Alabama.
I would be very saddened by this. I like Harsin, but
if he feels strongly enough to accept the consequences I would support him and think no less of him for standing by his principles.
I would be somewhat less upset if we backed the money truck up to Oxford to get Lane.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 3:22 pm to higgs_boson
quote:
I thought Nick Saban had a pretty good response to this (honestly like he does with most things). He brought in doctors, said it was a personal decision but also how it impacted the team and your potential ability to participate. Low and behold they hit 90% so there was no additional testing at Alabama.
You think Auburn didn't do this?
Latest Auburn News
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)