Started By
Message

Anti Bruce Pearl Rule?

Posted on 6/8/19 at 8:11 am
Posted by robbykidd
Tulsa
Member since May 2011
1379 posts
Posted on 6/8/19 at 8:11 am
NCAA Moves 3 Point Line

Does this hurt or help us? Some of our players have no problem launching some bad looks from 3. This will either lead to more bad looks or less shots taken. Harper would be fine....not so sure about Bryce last year. Will we have to change our play style? Or does this spread the floor for easier open looks? Will McLemore and Wiley benefit in the lane from better spacing?

Maybe I’m over thinking it, but it seems that this simple rule change could disrupt our style of play. The nega in me sees Doughty, Purifoy, McLemore tossing up a bunch of bricks all season. We will need some shooters to step up if we want to make any type of run for the SEC this year.

What do you guys think? Big problem or not a big deal?
Posted by TheSandman
Notasulga
Member since Nov 2010
19411 posts
Posted on 6/8/19 at 8:22 am to
start here
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
36410 posts
Posted on 6/8/19 at 11:05 am to
We can call it an anti Bruce Pearl rule but Villanova lit it up 10 3 point shots better the year before. More like an anti-trend rule.
Posted by BowlJackson
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2013
52881 posts
Posted on 6/8/19 at 11:37 am to
I think it helps our playing style
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
10929 posts
Posted on 6/8/19 at 11:54 am to
. . . so who does it hurt more?

A team that's lights out already at current spot or the team that's struggling to make good as it is?
Posted by BowlJackson
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2013
52881 posts
Posted on 6/8/19 at 2:18 pm to
It hurts teams that don't shoot 3s as much. Teams like Auburn who shoot a lot it doesn't really hurt because we shoot enough that we'll still get into a rhythm, a little bit if extra space won't make a huge difference. We weren't exactly taking a lot of our 3s from right against the line anyway, we were already shooting most of them from distance or further.
Posted by TheJones
Member since Nov 2009
33327 posts
Posted on 6/8/19 at 5:22 pm to
Might help Wiley out some with more room down low
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 6/8/19 at 7:54 pm to
Like all new rules it won't be an issue for the coaches that adapt and it will hamper those who don't.

#defensivesubstitutionrule
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
18366 posts
Posted on 6/9/19 at 7:40 am to
quote:

We weren't exactly taking a lot of our 3s from right against the line anyway, we were already shooting most of them from distance or further.


In terms of ability and talent to make the shot, it won't hurt us. I do think Harper and Brown had a lot of success taking deeper threes because the opposing team wasn't defending that far outside. With the line being moved, defenses will adjust to be out there making it more difficult to snatch those few deep threes we needed the past two seasons.
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 6/9/19 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

. so who does it hurt more?


Teams who don't space the floor well / shoot at all 5 positions on offense

Teams who play a significant amount of zone defense



Posted by AA7
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2009
26689 posts
Posted on 6/10/19 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Teams who play a significant amount of zone defense

Really curious to see how these teams adjust.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter